View Full Version : SM vs Victor Galindez
Xplosive
01-09-2007, 01:41 AM
This would be a savage war thats for sure. Would Galindez be too strong for Muhammed, or would Saad's power be too much for Galindez?
Double L
01-09-2007, 01:48 AM
I'd go with Galindez for sure. I think he was just a better fighter all around. Galindez/Qawi would be a good fight.
Xplosive
01-09-2007, 01:49 AM
I'd go with Galindez for sure. I think he was just a better fighter all around. Galindez/Qawi would be a good fight.
I think Qawi would have beaten the hell outta Galindez. But yes that would been a good fight also.
The Cuban Hawk
01-09-2007, 07:31 PM
Would Galindez be too strong for Muhammed, or would Saad's power be too much for Galindez?
The latter.
Rubio MHS
01-13-2007, 01:58 AM
The latter.Um, Galindez was never even knocked down until he was in the final stages of his career.
The Cuban Hawk
01-31-2007, 07:48 PM
Um, Galindez was never even knocked down until he was in the final stages of his career.
He also had to fight very tentatively around anyone with any degree of power, and often had to rely on intimidation to pull out close, sometimes controversial decisions in those fights. Saad is not likely to be intimidated by Galindez's "tricks", and so his jab, pressure, and firepower would carry him to a victory.
cdogg187
02-22-2007, 08:13 PM
Oh, Saad all the way IMO
Galindez liked to counter off the ropes with those looping counters, and he was pretty tough.
But he was not the kind of tough, compact brawler that could really scare Saad (like a Dwight Braxton/Qawi for example)
On the flip side, he wasn't the kind of boxer to be able to fully take advantage of Matthew's limitations either (lsuch as a John Conteh>for 14 rounds or so, anyway<)
Like someone else said, persistent thudding jab and that brutal right hand.
I think He bloodies Galindez up and stops him late in a terrific fight
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.