Are Margarito, Cintron, Williams and Forrest too big for Floyd? [Archive] - FIGHTBEAT.COM BOXING FORUMS

PDA

View Full Version : Are Margarito, Cintron, Williams and Forrest too big for Floyd?


slystaff
12-03-2007, 10:14 AM
There seems to be an opinion here (mainly from Double L and UGTBK) that these guys are too big for Floyd and therefore this is evidence that Floyd isn't the top Welterweight.

I'm calling bullshit on that!

Oscar is as big as any of the aforementioned and Mayweather dealt with his height, reach and power just fine.


Discuss. :popcorn:

Ugotabe Kidding
12-03-2007, 10:17 AM
There seems to be an opinion here (mainly from Double L and UGTBK) that these guys are too big for Floyd and therefore this is evidence that Floyd isn't the top Welterweight.

I'm calling bullshit on that!

Oscar is as big as any of the aforementioned and Mayweather dealt with his height, reach and power just fine.


Discuss. :popcorn:

I am calling your bullshit right here, lying sack of horse shit. Where have I ever said such thing? You have understood it wrong, I am not surprised really but that is not the same thing

slystaff
12-03-2007, 10:23 AM
I am calling your bullshit right here, lying sack of horse shit. Where have I ever said such thing? You have understood it wrong, I am not surprised really but that is not the same thingYou said that Floyd shouldn't be considered the P4P simple because he's not the best fighter in his own division as he's not big enough to handle some of the bigger guys in that division. Do you say that or did you not? :dunno:

Hanzy
12-03-2007, 10:24 AM
There seems to be an opinion here (mainly from Double L and UGTBK) that these guys are too big for Floyd and therefore this is evidence that Floyd isn't the top Welterweight.

I'm calling bullshit on that!

Oscar is as big as any of the aforementioned and Mayweather dealt with his height, reach and power just fine.


Discuss. :popcorn:

:nono: That was an old inactive Oscar with bad stamina, you fail to remember.

Ugotabe Kidding
12-03-2007, 10:28 AM
You said that Floyd shouldn't be considered the P4P simple because he's not the best fighter in his own division as he's not big enough to handle some of the bigger guys in that division. Do you say that or did you not? :dunno:

I have said that he can't be p4p the best because he hasn't PROVEN to be the best of his own division, especially not by a large margin as p4p leader should.

I have also said that for a welterweight, he is not very strong and that is the reason he is not much better than the other good fighters ofthe weight class, who are bigger and stronger than him.

I have NEVER said that he could not beat all those guys.

got it?

slystaff
12-03-2007, 10:31 AM
I have said that he can't be p4p the best because he hasn't PROVEN to be the best of his own division, especially not by a large margin as p4p leader should.

I have also said that for a welterweight, he is not very strong and that is the reason he is not much better than the other good fighters ofthe weight class, who are bigger and stronger than him.

I have NEVER said that he could not beat all those guys.

got it?Fair enough. :cool: