Question for Stafford

[Attraction]

You have been quoted in the past as saying that the world is 6,000 years old. (very embarrassing comment).

How old do you think Planet Earth is now?

[Rabid Kimba]

Are you shittin' me?

He believes that???????

:doh: :laughing: :doh: :laughing: :doh: :laughing:

[Attraction]

he has since taken it back but at one stage he did present a case for it several times and no doubt believed it. he then said he had reevaluated his argument "after further research". In another argument he also claimed that natural selection has "nothing to do with evolution".



I would like to hear his comments on these issues.

[Joe King]

There is no evolution.

[Ugotabe Kidding]

There is no evolution.

In you there isn't

[steve_dave]

There is no evolution.

:lol:

[dsimon3387]

In you there isn't

dsimon writes:

:lol: :lol: :lol: you caught me by suprise with that one Ugo coffee everywhere and my boy who I am taking fencing is looking at me like I am nuts.

Joe and Sly had to go to night school to grow a thumb. :tease:

[PetreTG]

I won't say what I am for or against , but as I have said so many times ... it's misinterpretation of the bible that is the biggest problem with religions.

Twisting it to mean what you want (Usually for the sake of control like with the belief in a literal hell) or simply interpreting it wrong through lack of common sense or outright ignorance.

The first lesson here is this ....

The Bible clearly states that A day to God is a THOUSAND years to man.

If we simply use this interpretation , then creation could not be 6 days .... it was at least 6000 years long.

Secondly what we have described in the bible is intelligent design over a period of 6000 years.


Now let's examine , not how far we have come in the last 5000+ years .... but what we're capable of , in our limited capacity now.

With what we are capable of now ... could we over the next 6000 years create an ecosphere around say, Mars ... and make it inhabitable and full of life ?

I'll bet you we could.

Now take a much more highly advanced being. We know him as God.

Could "he" do the same and more in 6000 years ???

IMO ... easily.

We can now create life via cloning. We are now engineering life to certain parameters. We are working on weather control and modification. Nano technology. Space exploration and so on and so on.

It would be ignorant of us to not believe their is much greater power "out there" ... much greater intelligence , then our own.

[slystaff]

You have been quoted in the past as saying that the world is 6,000 years old. (very embarrassing comment).

How old do you think Planet Earth is now?:lol:

I have no idea how old the earth is...oh and PLEASE find that old quote. PLEASE find it. Don't believe every single thing you read you gullible little irish shit who thinks he's black!

[Rabid Kimba]

In you there isn't

:lol:

[Orthodox Crusader]

You have been quoted in the past as saying that the world is 6,000 years old. (very embarrassing comment).

How old do you think Planet Earth is now?

The World isn't as old as you and Witter. That shit is REAL OLD.

[Black Market Baby]

In you there isn't

this was very funny.

[Attraction]

:lol:

I have no idea how old the earth is...oh and PLEASE find that old quote. PLEASE find it. Don't believe every single thing you read you gullible little irish shit who thinks he's black!

COME ON NOW STAFFORD, WE BOTH KNOW YOU SAID THAT. PITY THE OLD POSTS GOT DELETED.

[Tyler Durden]

I won't say what I am for or against , but as I have said so many times ... it's misinterpretation of the bible that is the biggest problem with religions.

Twisting it to mean what you want (Usually for the sake of control like with the belief in a literal hell) or simply interpreting it wrong through lack of common sense or outright ignorance.

The first lesson here is this ....

The Bible clearly states that A day to God is a THOUSAND years to man.

If we simply use this interpretation , then creation could not be 6 days .... it was at least 6000 years long.

Secondly what we have described in the bible is intelligent design over a period of 6000 years.


Now let's examine , not how far we have come in the last 5000+ years .... but what we're capable of , in our limited capacity now.

With what we are capable of now ... could we over the next 6000 years create an ecosphere around say, Mars ... and make it inhabitable and full of life ?

I'll bet you we could.

Now take a much more highly advanced being. We know him as God.

Could "he" do the same and more in 6000 years ???

IMO ... easily.

We can now create life via cloning. We are now engineering life to certain parameters. We are working on weather control and modification. Nano technology. Space exploration and so on and so on.

It would be ignorant of us to not believe their is much greater power "out there" ... much greater intelligence , then our own.

The Bible CLEARLY uses incorrect numbers in it and miscalculations ALOT, which is NOT left to interpretation, your guess is just as good as anyone elses when it comes to "correect" interpretations because it is wrong and people try to twist and appologize for it, I can prove this by a Bible-thumpers comment on this factual statement that cannot be argued against, if they dare to address my comments :popcorn:

[PetreTG]

The Bible CLEARLY uses incorrect numbers in it and miscalculations ALOT, which is NOT left to interpretation, your guess is just as good as anyone elses when it comes to "correect" interpretations because it is wrong and people try to twist and appologize for it, I can prove this by a Bible-thumpers comment on this factual statement that cannot be argued against, if they dare to address my comments :popcorn:

I don't disagree ... the question is , was that human error ???

The most respected version of the bible by many is the King James , which is a bastard child of the original text at best with many many ommissions and changes.

But I'm not here to argue faith for or against it ...

[Tyler Durden]

I don't disagree ... the question is , was that human error ???

The most respected version of the bible by many is the King James , which is a bastard child of the original text at best with many many ommissions and changes.

But I'm not here to argue faith for or against it ...

I'm not arguing faith either, I am just stating it is full of errors, embarrassing mathematical errors in fact.....

[slystaff]

COME ON NOW STAFFORD, WE BOTH KNOW YOU SAID THAT. PITY THE OLD POSTS GOT DELETED.I never said that the Earth is 6000 years old...that's urban legend. i did say that it wasn't as old as 3 billion years and mankind has only been on Earth for tens of thousands of years (I have very good reason for that belief) but don't believe everything you read you gullible bitter atheist black Irishman....

[Ugotabe Kidding]

I never said that the Earth is 6000 years old...that's urban legend. i did say that it wasn't as old as 3 billion years and mankind has only been on Earth for tens of thousands of years (I have very good reason for that belief) but don't believe everything you read you gullible bitter atheist black Irishman....

I bet

[Joe King]

http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/

[Tyler Durden]

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-ev.html

[Attraction]

heres a post where stafford says the earth is 20,000 years old...

http://www.fightbeat.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10412&postcount=175

"However...the Earth is THOUSANDS of years old (maybe 20,000).....NOT BILLIONS of years old like they are claiming. "

Oh dear

:lol:

[Attraction]

actually i am 1 quarter chinese, 1 quarter black and half irish with a bit of italian and spanish background stafford.

[Rabid Kimba]

heres a post where stafford says the earth is 20,000 years old...

http://www.fightbeat.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10412&postcount=175

"However...the Earth is THOUSANDS of years old (maybe 20,000).....NOT BILLIONS of years old like they are claiming. "

Oh dear

:lol:

:doh: :laughing:

[slystaff]

heres a post where stafford says the earth is 20,000 years old...

http://www.fightbeat.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10412&postcount=175

"However...the Earth is THOUSANDS of years old (maybe 20,000).....NOT BILLIONS of years old like they are claiming. "

Oh dear

:lol:

I still don't think the Earth is billions of years old. I beieve that time frame was created in order to facilitate the ridiculous and unproven theory of evolution.

But in any event...what are you trying to prove by calling me out, attraction?

Do you not realize that this now opens you up and makes you my sole target for the next few months? Why would you do that...especially considering you're prone to coming out with stupid useless threads and alread have quite a few detractors.

Quite honestly, you should have kept your ass quiet.

[Attraction]

I still don't think the Earth is billions of years old. I beieve that time frame was created in order to facilitate the ridiculous and unproven theory of evolution.

But in any event...what are you trying to prove by calling me out, attraction?

Do you not realize that this now opens you up and makes you my sole target for the next few months? Why would you do that...especially considering you're prone to coming out with stupid useless threads and alread have quite a few detractors.

Quite honestly, you should have kept your ass quiet.

Oh dear, he hasn't even defended his comment.

:lol:

"The Earth is 20,000 years old"

:laughing:

[slystaff]

Oh dear, he hasn't even defended his comment.

:lol:

"The Earth is 20,000 years old"

:laughing:I have no intention of defending anything on this thread to be honest with you. No need to.

however

You will find yourself having to defend much very soon......

[Attraction]

I have no intention of defending anything on this thread to be honest with you. No need to.

however

You will find yourself having to defend much very soon......

If the Earth is 20,000 years old, how old is the universe? 20,000?

I think 25,000.

:lol:

[Rabid Kimba]

20,000 years old....

:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:


I'm sorry Sly, you are one cool dude, and highly intelligent (at times)...but good grief...GET THE FRIGGIN' OUTTA THEM MIDDLE AGES, MAN!!!

:doh: :lol:

[Attraction]

20,000 years old....

:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:


I'm sorry Sly, you are one cool dude, and highly intelligent (at times)...but good grief...GET THE FRIGGIN' OUTTA THEM MIDDLE AGES, MAN!!!

:doh: :lol:

actually i think you will find that stafford has scientific proof that the earth is 20,000 years old and god exists.

[Rabid Kimba]

actually i think you will find that stafford has scientific proof that the earth is 20,000 years old and god exists.

Yes, I bet he does.

:lol:

[dymipepel]

20 thousand years is reasonable :dunno:

[Rabid Kimba]

:lol:

[dymipepel]

Earth is 20 thousand years old, and Sly is 5 years old. :dunno:

[Attraction]

Earth is 20 thousand years old, and Sly is 5 years old. :dunno:

:lol:

[Rabid Kimba]

:lol:

[dymipepel]

Oh, and in Sly's defence, one "Sly year" equals 25 thousand "human years".
So, if you multply 20 thousand Sly years by 25 thousand human years, you'll get 5 billion years, which is right on point :dunno:

[Rabid Kimba]

:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

[dsimon3387]

Oh, and in Sly's defence, one "Sly year" equals 25 thousand "human years".
So, if you multply 20 thousand Sly years by 25 thousand human years, you'll get 5 billion years, which is right on point :dunno:

dsimon writes:

:doh: :lol:. Stafford is also stuck in the middle ages regarding philosophy as he uses medieval arguments to try to prove the existence of God.:notallthere:

According to your time scheme D when Stafford is ten years old he will discover Descartes.

[slystaff]

dsimon writes:

:doh: :lol:. Stafford is also stuck in the middle ages regarding philosophy as he uses medieval arguments to try to prove the existence of God.:notallthere:

According to your time scheme D when Stafford is ten years old he will discover Descartes.:lol: Sonofabitch!

You're cool though dsimon...an intelligent dude for sure...and I'd be certain to resurrect our God/evolution debates very soon (still unbeaten in those :cool: )....but this attraction with have to feel the wrath for having the audacity for calling me out unprovoked.

Does he fucking think he's untouchable? Does he really think this would go unpunished? :lol:

Motherfucker's E-DEAD!!!!:warning:

[Attraction]

:lol: Sonofabitch!

You're cool though dsimon...an intelligent dude for sure...and I'd be certain to resurrect our God/evolution debates very soon (still unbeaten in those :cool: )....but this attraction with have to feel the wrath for having the audacity for calling me out unprovoked.

Does he fucking think he's untouchable? Does he really think this would go unpunished? :lol:

Motherfucker's E-DEAD!!!!:warning:

:eek:

I'm scared :eeeek:.

[Rabid Kimba]

...and I'd be certain to resurrect our God/evolution debates very soon (still unbeaten in those :cool: ).

Unbeaten, ok...

:lol:

[Attraction]

Unbeaten, ok...

:lol:

Yeah I also thought that was funny :lol:

I've whipped his damn ass.

Even in this thread I'm whipping his black ass :laughing::laughing:

:cheer:

[Ugotabe Kidding]

Unbeaten, ok...

:lol:

:lol: :lol: exactly. Any objective reader can see that Sly has been outgunned time and time again in those discussions but since he refuses to admit he is wrong, he thinks he has "won". Just like Orion used to do

[Rabid Kimba]

:lol:

[whiskey]

You're cool though dsimon...an intelligent dude for sure...and I'd be certain to resurrect our God/evolution debates very soon (still unbeaten in those :cool: )....but this attraction with have to feel the wrath for having the audacity for calling me out unprovoked.




:lol: :laughing:

[PetreTG]

I'm not arguing faith either, I am just stating it is full of errors, embarrassing mathematical errors in fact.....

Try to remember that the bible was written and translated and copied in an era of no computers typewriters or any other form of mass print media.

Men copying by hand literally millions of words of text .... mistakes were bound to happen.

Where would they most likely happen ? In the most repetitive areas of the bible where you in fact find the most glaring mistakes.

The message of it however remains pretty clear.

[dsimon3387]

:lol: Sonofabitch!

You're cool though dsimon...an intelligent dude for sure...and I'd be certain to resurrect our God/evolution debates very soon (still unbeaten in those :cool: )....but this attraction with have to feel the wrath for having the audacity for calling me out unprovoked.

Does he fucking think he's untouchable? Does he really think this would go unpunished? :lol:

Motherfucker's E-DEAD!!!!:warning:

dsimon writes:

Attraction is feeling the wrath of the bloody stool. :doh:

[Ugotabe Kidding]

Try to remember that the bible was written and translated and copied in an era of no computers typewriters or any other form of mass print media.

Men copying by hand literally millions of words of text .... mistakes were bound to happen.

Where would they most likely happen ? In the most repetitive areas of the bible where you in fact find the most glaring mistakes.

The message of it however remains pretty clear.

Why didn't the Holy Spirit help them out? According to church it helped people to choose the correct religious books into Bible (ie leave out the ones that wouldn't have served the church well)

[slystaff]

Why didn't the Holy Spirit help them out? According to church it helped people to choose the correct religious books into Bible (ie leave out the ones that wouldn't have served the church well)Credit where credit is due! That is a very good and well informed question.

Personally...I'm not getting into religion with a rigid CHristianity hating atheist...but I respect that question.

[Black Market Baby]

Credit where credit is due! That is a very good and well informed question.

Personally...I'm not getting into religion with a rigid CHristianity hating atheist...but I respect that question.

Do you think all atheists (or even agnostics ) hate Christianity? Personally I do not believe in a higher being but I am fascinated with religion in general. I am a non-believer who chooses to ask questions. The only thing I hate about religion is their fanatical nut jobs who don't know what they are talking about, I am sure you would agree with me on that.

[slystaff]

Do you think all atheists (or even agnostics ) hate Christianity? Personally I do not believe in a higher being but I am fascinated with religion in general. I am a non-believer who chooses to ask questions. The only thing I hate about religion is their fanatical nut jobs who don't know what they are talking about, I am sure you would agree with me on that.Yep and that's cool. But UGTBK is not like you.

[Buddy Rydell]

actually i am 1 quarter chinese, 1 quarter black and half irish with a bit of italian and spanish background stafford.

The more you bullshit; the more I think you're Hanzy or Rainmaker. :lol:

[Tyler Durden]

heres a post where stafford says the earth is 20,000 years old...

http://www.fightbeat.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10412&postcount=175

"However...the Earth is THOUSANDS of years old (maybe 20,000).....NOT BILLIONS of years old like they are claiming. "

Oh dear

:lol:

OWNED, good job. I didn't think to look in the hall of shame :lol:

[Buddy Rydell]

4 pages, and nobody has asked the obvious question: is that 20,000 in horse years or human years? :lol:

[Tyler Durden]

.and I'd be certain to resurrect our God/evolution debates very soon (still unbeaten in those :cool: )....

How about you let it die and just watch this:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/program.html

Watch all 12 chapters, it's interesting even if your agenda clouds your reasoning :lol:

[Tyler Durden]

Try to remember that the bible was written and translated and copied in an era of no computers typewriters or any other form of mass print media.

Men copying by hand literally millions of words of text .... mistakes were bound to happen.

Where would they most likely happen ? In the most repetitive areas of the bible where you in fact find the most glaring mistakes.

The message of it however remains pretty clear.

I was informed they go through rigorous copying precedures and they are not alowed to deviate a single letter :dunno:

[Tyler Durden]

4 pages, and nobody has asked the obvious question: is that 20,000 in horse years or human years? :lol:

:laughing:

[Ugotabe Kidding]

Do you think all atheists (or even agnostics ) hate Christianity? Personally I do not believe in a higher being but I am fascinated with religion in general. I am a non-believer who chooses to ask questions. The only thing I hate about religion is their fanatical nut jobs who don't know what they are talking about, I am sure you would agree with me on that.

I agree completely with this post. Sly is again putting words into my mouth, as if his own wasn't big enough

[slystaff]

4 pages, and nobody has asked the obvious question: is that 20,000 in horse years or human years? :lol::lol: Do you really want to resurrect our smacktalk?

[Trplsec]

I still don't think the Earth is billions of years old. I beieve that time frame was created in order to facilitate the ridiculous and unproven theory of evolution.

But in any event...what are you trying to prove by calling me out, attraction?

Do you not realize that this now opens you up and makes you my sole target for the next few months? Why would you do that...especially considering you're prone to coming out with stupid useless threads and alread have quite a few detractors.

Quite honestly, you should have kept your ass quiet.


Yep, only religion would make you question radiometric dating of 4 billion year-old rocks found on earth.

Only religion.

[PetreTG]

I was informed they go through rigorous copying precedures and they are not alowed to deviate a single letter :dunno:

I'm sure anyont that took on the task tried their absolute best , but humans are far from perfect.

100 mistakes in 100million words of text .... not bad!

[Buddy Rydell]

:lol: Do you really want to resurrect our smacktalk?

C'mon, dude. That was funny. :lol:

I don't have a real desire to light you up, but life is short so if it's an asswhupping you want, it's an asswhupping you shall receive. I am always gracious to my fans! :cool: :lol:

[Rabid Kimba]

Religion is for babosos and pendejos.

:popcorn:

[Tyler Durden]

I'm sure anyont that took on the task tried their absolute best , but humans are far from perfect.

100 mistakes in 100million words of text .... not bad!

But it was from which God last got involved supposedly with humans and was going on a vacation for a long time, I would assume he make them get it right :dunno:Also, along with contradictions and events out of order, there were horrible SIMPLE mathematical mistakes, not bad, but not good either!

[Tyler Durden]

C'mon, dude. That was funny. :lol:

I don't have a real desire to light you up, but life is short so if it's an asswhupping you want, it's an asswhupping you shall receive. I am always gracious to my fans! :cool: :lol:

Sly's only real objection is you whipping a dead horse again.....

[bpg]

I love it when religious supporters say evolution is rediculous and unproven. :lol:

[Baron]

Yep, only religion would make you question radiometric dating of 4 billion year-old rocks found on earth.

Only religion.:lol: :bears: :bears:

Yep, our dating methods are a conspiracy to help people swallow another conspiracy, the theory of evolution...

[LOK]

I always thought it was spelled "Bendejos" ?


Religion is for babosos and pendejos.

:popcorn:

[Attraction]

Yep, only religion would make you question radiometric dating of 4 billion year-old rocks found on earth.

Only religion.

lol, not only the earth either! rocks have been taken from small meteors that have crashed too.

[PetreTG]

Another thing some might want to consider is weather or not the literal interpretation of creating earth meant the globe itself.

I don't think it did.

The bible describes the earth as formless and a waste with darkness and the use of a force across the surface of the seas that were on it.

Simplistic description of something "scientific" being done ?

Let's say some day far from now we decided to terraform a planet .

We might similarly describe the planet before we began. It would certainly explain the age of some things on Earth.

[Rabid Kimba]

I always thought it was spelled "Bendejos" ?

No, it's spelled PENDEJO...pinche baboso.

:lol:

[Attraction]

does anyone remember this thread?

[atomicdOGg34]

sly, you did say the earth was 6000 years old

im not going digging for the thread if it even still exists but you said it

if you want to believe in some dictator in the sky that watches your every move, then be my guest

personally i find the notion disgusting and insulting

[Attraction]

sly, you did say the earth was 6000 years old

im not going digging for the thread if it even still exists but you said it

if you want to believe in some dictator in the sky that watches your every move, then be my guest

personally i find the notion disgusting and insulting

indeed stafford displayed his "intelligence" with that comment

<hr style="color: rgb(209, 209, 225);" size="1"> <!-- / icon and title --> <!-- message --> heres a post where stafford says the earth is 20,000 years old...

http://www.fightbeat.com/forums/show...&postcount=175 (http://www.fightbeat.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10412&postcount=175)

"However...the Earth is THOUSANDS of years old (maybe 20,000).....NOT BILLIONS of years old like they are claiming. "

Oh dear

:lol:
<!-- / message --><!-- controls -->

[atomicdOGg34]

indeed stafford displayed his "intelligence" with that comment


<HR style="COLOR: rgb(209,209,225)" SIZE=1> <!-- / icon and title --> <!-- message --> heres a post where stafford says the earth is 20,000 years old...

http://www.fightbeat.com/forums/show...&postcount=175 (http://www.fightbeat.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10412&postcount=175)

"However...the Earth is THOUSANDS of years old (maybe 20,000).....NOT BILLIONS of years old like they are claiming. "

Oh dear

:lol:
<!-- / message --><!-- controls -->

only a small mistake really

:laughing:

[atomicdOGg34]

slys so stupid he doesnt even use the newer, "better" arguments for god

hes pushing stupid archaic arguments that were blasted out of the water 200 years ago :lol:

[Attraction]

slys so stupid he doesnt even use the newer, "better" arguments for god

hes pushing stupid archaic arguments that were blasted out of the water 200 years ago :lol:

lol

i wonder will he address his comment and stand by it?

i await the intellectual response of stafford attazi

[mexican wedding shirt]

That's utterly hilarious, I missed this the first time around.

What's stafford's explanation for fossilised dinosaurs that date back millions of years?

[steve_dave]

:lol: I missed this too.

[Baron]

That's utterly hilarious, I missed this the first time around.

What's stafford's explanation for fossilised dinosaurs that date back millions of years?The devil... He placed the fossils to mislead us and make us doubt the scripture, the true words of God.

[Tyler Durden]

That's utterly hilarious, I missed this the first time around.

What's stafford's explanation for fossilised dinosaurs that date back millions of years?

http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news0604/snake.html

[whiskey]

only a small mistake really

:laughing:

Yep, just a trivial one. :lol:

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/12TqdF4t9fg&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/12TqdF4t9fg&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

[slystaff]

:lol:

Attraction ressurects this thread out of anger and to take the attention off of him and guess what...

He's STILL a Bankrupt Bastard! :lol:

[Tyler Durden]

:lol:

Attraction ressurects this thread out of anger and to take the attention off of him and guess what...

He's STILL a Bankrupt Bastard! :lol:

:lol: actually I think this is the third time it got resurrected. You will never live this down! :clap:

[slystaff]

:lol: actually I think this is the third time it got resurrected. You will never live this down! :clap:It's all good baby...it puts the attention on me and you know how much i love attention! :lol:

The difference is...I've since denounced (political speak..since it's the season :cool: ) my earlier comments and admitted that I truly don't know the age of the Earth.

Attraction, however, is still a bankrupt bastard! :laughing:

[Tyler Durden]

It's all good baby...it puts the attention on me and you know how much i love attention! :lol:

The difference is...I've since denounced (political speak..since it's the season :cool: ) my earlier comments and admitted that I truly don't know the age of the Earth.

Attraction, however, is still a bankrupt bastard! :laughing:

Are you an orphan? Only child?

[slystaff]

Are you an orphan? Only child?Neither...just a handsome, super-intelligent, charming successful fella! :cool:

Wherever I am the focus is on me. So it's no surprised that on this forum I get a plethora of threads that are dedicated just to me. I keep it alive around here baby! :cool:

The Sly One has Spoken!!

[Tyler Durden]

Neither...just a handsome, super-intelligent, charming successful fella! :cool:

Wherever I am the focus is on me. So it's no surprised that on this forum I get a plethora of threads that are dedicated just to me. I keep it alive around here baby! :cool:

The Sly One has Spoken!!

So you have biological parents and siblings?

[dsimon3387]

So you have biological parents and siblings?

dsimon writes:

If there are more Sly's running around God's earth I want a refund on my membership to the human race!

I was wondering who resurected this necromancratic thread.

The thought of Sly matching wits with Attraction is about as exciting as the thought of Klitschko versus Potvkin. :dunno: :doh:

But who knows.... maybe we will find out whether one half wit plus one half wit equals a full dimwit! :lol:

[Tyler Durden]

dsimon writes:

If there are more Sly's running around God's earth I want a refund on my membership to the human race!

I was wondering who resurected this necromancratic thread.

The thought of Sly matching wits with Attraction is about as exciting as the thought of Klitschko versus Potvkin. :dunno: :doh:

But who knows.... maybe we will find out whether one half wit plus one half wit equals a full dimwit! :lol:

:lol:

[Neil]

There is no evolution.


why would God create a gelatinous sloth of a creature such as yourself?

you mustve evolved from the ralphie may/eric esch phylum

[mexican wedding shirt]

Neil sure does hate Joe King :lol:

[dsimon3387]

why would God create a gelatinous sloth of a creature such as yourself?

you mustve evolved from the ralphie may/eric esch phylum

dsimon writes:

Actually Neil Joe is right.... In his case indeed there is no evolution of the grey area part of the cerebral cortex. JOe is an atavistic halfwit who had to go to night school to learn how to grow a thumb. He does not actually read the Bible, he is inspired by it through diffusion. Why read the big words when you can have the.... the diffusion that Jesus gives so gratiously to Joe? :eeeek:

[mexican wedding shirt]

dsimon writes:

Actually Neil Joe is right.... In his case indeed there is no evolution of the grey area part of the cerebral cortex. JOe is an atavistic halfwit who had to go to night school to learn how to grow a thumb. He does not actually read the Bible, he is inspired by it through diffusion. Why read the big words when you can have the.... the diffusion that Jesus gives so gratiously to Joe? :eeeek:

:lol: :lol:

[Attraction]

It's all good baby...it puts the attention on me and you know how much i love attention! :lol:

The difference is...I've since denounced (political speak..since it's the season :cool: ) my earlier comments and admitted that I truly don't know the age of the Earth.

Attraction, however, is still a bankrupt bastard! :laughing:
Not before you graced the board with many "intellectual" long winded posts about how the earth is 6,000 years old. How much of a fucking retard would you have to be to do this? You were actively presenting idiotic and plain DUMB arguments in your usual "I am the most intelligent guy here" attitude. THATS embarrassing. I mean, it's not even too long ago that you were acting all high and mighty presenting the arguments of a retard

:lol:

[slystaff]

Not before you graced the board with many "intellectual" long winded posts about how the earth is 6,000 years old. How much of a fucking retard would you have to be to do this? You were actively presenting idiotic and plain DUMB arguments in your usual "I am the most intelligent guy here" attitude. THATS embarrassing. I mean, it's not even too long ago that you were acting all high and mighty presenting the arguments of a retard

:lol:Yeah...

But you're still a shit smelling, broken "banjo" having, only contribution to boxing analysis being Junior witter's next "liquidation" offering, Bankrupt Bastard! :lol:

[Attraction]

heres a post where stafford says the earth is 20,000 years old...

http://www.fightbeat.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10412&postcount=175

"However...the Earth is THOUSANDS of years old (maybe 20,000).....NOT BILLIONS of years old like they are claiming. "

Oh dear

:lol:


bump

[slystaff]

bumpNice bump...but...

...you're still a shit smelling, broken "banjo" having, Junior Witter's EXPOSED ass sniffing, Bankrupt Bastard! :lol:<!-- / message -->

[Attraction]

Nice bump...but...

...you're still a shit smelling, broken "banjo" having, Junior Witter's EXPOSED ass sniffing, Bankrupt Bastard! :lol:<!-- / message -->

I'd rather be that than to think the earth is 20,000 years old.

But then again, you are the most intelligent guy here and "unbeaten" in any debates.

:atu:

[slystaff]

I'd rather be that than to think the earth is 20,000 years old.

But then again, you are the most intelligent guy here and "unbeaten" in any debates.

:atu:
Nice try...BANKRUPT BASTARD! :lol:

[Joe King]

If the earth is billions of years old and Man is millions of years old, then why can't we find evidence of civilization older than 6,000 years old?:nono:

[mexican wedding shirt]

If the earth is billions of years old and Man is millions of years old, then why can't we find evidence of civilization older than 6,000 years old?:nono:

We can, and have, you neanderthal.

[Attraction]

If the earth is billions of years old and Man is millions of years old, then why can't we find evidence of civilization older than 6,000 years old?:nono:

:lol:

[Attraction]

20,000 years old....

:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:


I'm sorry Sly, you are one cool dude, and highly intelligent (at times)...but good grief...GET THE FRIGGIN' OUTTA THEM MIDDLE AGES, MAN!!!

:doh: :lol:

:laughing:

[Joe King]

We can, and have, you neanderthal.

So you have evidence for man's existence millions of years ago? I call bull:shit:

[Joe King]

Neil sure does hate Joe King :lol:

It's because I fucked his mother.:hammert:

[slystaff]

Guys don't get it twisted. This Attraction is only bumping this thread to draw attaention away from the fact that he's a BANKRUPT BASTARD!:lol:

[Ugotabe Kidding]

We can, and have, you neanderthal.

No we can't, if we only search evidence from Bible that is

[Attraction]

No we can't, if we only search evidence from Bible that is

:lol:

[atomicdOGg34]

:lol:

"unproven theory of evolution"

brilliant

[slystaff]

:lol:

"unproven theory of evolution"

brilliant
perfectly true.

That's why it's called the "theory" of evolution, brainiac.

[jaws1216]

perfectly true.

That's why it's called the "theory" of evolution, brainiac.

And I suppose math topics like "Group Theory" and "Ring Theory" are so named because they also haven't been proven?

Keep eatin' those cubes

[Tyler Durden]

perfectly true.

That's why it's called the "theory" of evolution, brainiac.

Let's not pretend it is like a weak theory anyone could make up. Evolution has been tested for almost 150 years and no experiment or observation has contradicted the general outlines of it. When you have more than one science backing it up, odds are it is pretty solid.

[Joe King]

Let's not pretend it is like a weak theory anyone could make up. Evolution has been tested for almost 150 years and no experiment or observation has contradicted the general outlines of it. When you have more than one science backing it up, odds are it is pretty solid.

That's because the "theory" so broad that it covers up all types of holes. Why aren't we evolving then? We are more self destructive than ever. Why did we "stop evolving"?

If mankind has been on earth over a million years, as the evolutionists tell us, then why do the records of their activity only go back a few thousand years. The evidence agrees with the Bible account, not with the evolutionists. Evolutionary theory is a myth. God created everything; the evidence clearly points to it. Nothing else can explain the mountain of evidence. This is science vs. evolution—a Creation-Evolution Encyclopedia, brought to you by Creation Science Facts.
CONTENT: How Far Back do the Records Go? - 2
Languages (http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/05agee6.htm#Languages) - Ancient languages never back beyond c. 3000 B.C., and radiate outward from Mesopotamia Ancient Historical Records (http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/05agee6.htm#Ancient Records) - The oldest dates go back to about 3000 B.C.
The Oldest People (http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/05agee6.htm#Oldest People) - They do not go back before c. 3000 B.C., and were located in Mesopotamia Conclusion (http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/05agee6.htm#Conclusion) - Man, whom the evolutionists claim to have come into existence over a million years ago, is said to have "stopped evolving" 100,000 years ago. Why then do we not have at least 100,000 years of civilizations, cities, and human remains?

[Tyler Durden]

That's because the "theory" so broad that it covers up all types of holes. Why aren't we evolving then? We are more self destructive than ever. Why did we "stop evolving"?




Everything is evolving, you are very ignorant, allow me to copy and paste in the off chance you might read.

Well, everyone knows that evolution, in a sense, is change over time. But what few people understand is how straightforward the nature of this change is. It's important to understand, first of all, that individuals don't evolve. I'm not evolving into something else, and my dog isn't evolving into something else. I'm going to remain a human being, he's going to remain a dog. That's the way things are going to work. What changes over time are populations of individuals, for very straightforward reasons.

Number one, every species shows variation among individual members of that population. Number two, individuals in a population show what biologists call differential reproductive success. Some individuals leave more offspring than others. Some people have no children; some people have big families. Finally, one of the factors that influences differential reproductive success is how well-suited individuals are to the present environment in which they find themselves—how good they are at obtaining food, defending themselves against their enemies, resisting disease, and finding and meeting a member of the opposite sex and raising offspring. All these things matter.

What Darwin appreciated is that nature herself selects from variants in the population for those that are best able to succeed in this race for differential reproductive success. Over time, and given a steady input of new variation into the population, that can change the average characteristics of a species, and it can split one species into two. Those species, those two groups, can then go on changing in different directions. That's what leads to the formation of yet more new species. Nature herself automatically selects for favorable variations, and this is the driving engine of evolutionary change. That, in a nutshell, is what evolution is.

It's important to appreciate that all historical records are necessarily incomplete. We don't have complete data for any historical process. I've tried to trace my own ancestry, and after about four generations, we lose bits and pieces of it. I don't think that means I don't have any ancestry. I think it means that some of the evidence is missing.
The same is true for the study of history. We know, for example, when and where the Battle of Gettysburg took place in the Civil War. We know the opposing generals on both sides. But we don't know exactly what every soldier, by name, was doing at every moment during the Battle of Gettysburg. That doesn't mean Gettysburg didn't take place. It doesn't mean that the Union forces didn't win. It simply means we have more to learn about that battle.
The same is true for the fossil record. We have an enormous amount of information as to what life was like in the past. That information tells us that life changed, that it changed in a particular pattern, and that the history of change is complete, with one example after another of descent with modification, an ancestor-descendant relationship between organisms. And in a few lucky cases, we can trace almost step by step the evolution of key organisms in the history of life.

One of the great mischaracterizations of evolution is that it's driven by random chance, that things just happen. People like to say, "I don't like to believe that I'm just an accident." Well, you're not. What evolution says is that the variation that crops up in a species is indeed unpredictable. We can't be sure what will happen next. But that doesn't mean it's random.
To me, the word "random" means anything can happen. But the reality is that evolutionary change is restricted. It's restricted by the laws of physics and chemistry. It's restricted by the nature of molecular biology. It's restricted by the constraints of developmental biology during development. Most importantly, evolutionary change is governed by natural selection, and natural selection is not a random process at all. Natural selection selects for successful phenotypes, for successful combinations of characteristics that actually work, and that's not random at all.

[Tyler Durden]

The Oldest People (http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/05agee6.htm#Oldest People) - They do not go back before c. 3000 B.C., and were located in Mesopotamia Conclusion (http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/05agee6.htm#Conclusion) - Man, whom the evolutionists claim to have come into existence over a million years ago, is said to have "stopped evolving" 100,000 years ago. Why then do we not have at least 100,000 years of civilizations, cities, and human remains?


(AP) <!-- sphereit start -->Bones discovered nearly 40 years ago in Ethiopia now appear to be the oldest known fossils of modern-looking humans, says an analysis that suggests they come from around the dawn of the species.

Researchers determined that the specimens are around 195,000 years old. Previously, the oldest known fossils of Homo sapiens were Ethiopian skulls dated to about 160,000 years ago.

Genetic studies estimate that Homo sapiens arose about 200,000 years ago, so the new research brings the fossil record more in line with that, said John Fleagle of Stony Brook University in New York, an author of the study.

[Joe King]

(AP) <!-- sphereit start -->Bones discovered nearly 40 years ago in Ethiopia now appear to be the oldest known fossils of modern-looking humans, says an analysis that suggests they come from around the dawn of the species.


Modern-looking humans? Suggests? Hardly factual evidence just by the wording of the article.

[Tyler Durden]

Modern-looking humans? Suggests? Hardly factual evidence just by the wording of the article.

:lol: I think OJ used the same defense despite the DNA evidence. Yeah, that's how science works, they determine things by how they "look" in appearance :laughing:

[Joe King]

:lol: I think OJ used the same defense despite the DNA evidence. Yeah, that's how science works, they determine things by how they "look" in appearance :laughing:

Thanks for proving my point. :atu:

[Tyler Durden]

Thanks for proving my point. :atu:

Proving how silly you sound? Because that is your opinion I was sarcastically making fun of. First your argument is : There are no humans older than 6000 years. I'm pretty sure you actually make fun of I and I too :doh:

Time for Joe to do the twist.....

Now, a new analysis of the Kibish River skulls using new dating techniques puts their age at just under 200,000 years, confirming that they are the oldest known examples of human species.

[Joe King]

Proving how silly you sound? Because that is your opinion I was sarcastically making fun of. First your argument is : There are no humans older than 6000 years. I'm pretty sure you actually make fun of I and I too

Time for Joe to do the twist.....

Of course the "dating" will reflect what they want to believe in.

[Tyler Durden]

Of course the "dating" will reflect what they want to believe in.

Of course the carbon dating doesn't adhere to Biblical "science"?, so therefore it is false. Seriously, this is some embarrassing strawman, only Religion would attempt it.....wonder why?

:hammert: