Tito vs Pavlik @160 [Archive] - FIGHTBEAT.COM BOXING FORUMS

PDA

View Full Version : Tito vs Pavlik @160


Kaliber44
01-09-2008, 11:55 PM
Who wins? Say Tito knocks out Roid and then goes after Pavlik. Would Tito have a shot against Casper?

Tam Tam
01-10-2008, 12:07 AM
No.

Now add yourself to your sig.

Kaliber44
01-10-2008, 12:13 AM
No.

Now add yourself to your sig.

:lol: :nono: :flip:

Rubio MHS
01-10-2008, 12:40 AM
No.

Now add yourself to your sig.:bears:

Kaliber44
01-10-2008, 12:47 AM
Tito has good power @ 160 and Pavlik is not hard to hit so don't make this out be some sort of mismatch.

Rubio MHS
01-10-2008, 01:07 AM
Tito has good power @ 160.What, based on him knocking out William Joppy in 2001? Joppy dropped his hands and slugged. Pavlik wouldn't do that.

Xplosive
01-10-2008, 01:34 AM
Pavlik would skull fuck Tito.

royyjonesjrp4pno1
01-10-2008, 07:37 AM
Pavlik would beat his ass worse then then Roy would.

Beyond the Grave
01-10-2008, 08:26 AM
Pavliks a better fighter skill wise.

Rubio MHS
01-10-2008, 10:15 AM
Pavlik easily destroys a prime Trinidad.

joony
01-10-2008, 10:16 AM
who wins, golota vs. any decent heavyweight?

Rubio MHS
01-10-2008, 10:17 AM
I'm not convinced that this topic isn't one big Polish joke.

Kaliber44
01-10-2008, 12:01 PM
Don't get me wrong I'd pick Pavlik too without any doubt but Trinidad would have more of a shot against Pavlik then a guy like Wright. Plus if this fight came off it would generate a big interest.

joony
01-10-2008, 12:11 PM
Don't get me wrong I'd pick Pavlik too without any doubt but Trinidad would have more of a shot against Pavlik then a guy like Wright. Plus if this fight came off it would generate a big interest.

i'd rather see juan diaz vs. matt zegan. it never hurts to see a polish pretender get beat up.

Rubio MHS
01-10-2008, 12:20 PM
Don't get me wrong I'd pick Pavlik too without any doubt but Trinidad would have more of a shot against Pavlik then a guy like Wright. Plus if this fight came off it would generate a big interest.Like one in a million instead of one in five million?