I love cock!!! [Archive] - FIGHTBEAT.COM BOXING FORUMS

PDA

View Full Version : I love cock!!!


Hex-One
01-31-2008, 10:41 AM
Now that the Pavlik dick sucking bandwagon has been posted yet again, I thought why not the Taylor Bandwagon? I will tell you this, alot of people are setting themselves up to be shocked again! Taylor is the better boxer, has much more hand-speed. Taylor also has the power to hurt Pavlik as he shown in the first fight. I believe in the rematch Taylor will win and will win by a stunning knockout of Pavlik.




WAR TAYLOR!!!!:bears: :bears: :bears:

ArturoGatti
01-31-2008, 10:47 AM
If he wins, it would be bad for boxing. We will have a mw champion that just got knocked the fuck out in a non-title fight. :doh:

Orthodox Crusader
01-31-2008, 10:59 AM
If he wins, it would be bad for boxing. We will have a mw champion that just got knocked the fuck out in a non-title fight. :doh:

Think Griffith-Hurricane.

Ugotabe Kidding
01-31-2008, 11:36 AM
I think Taylor has a good chance. He is a very talented athlete

REEDsART
01-31-2008, 11:42 AM
Now that the Pavlik dick sucking bandwagon has been posted yet again, I thought why not the Taylor Bandwagon? I will tell you this, alot of people are setting themselves up to be shocked again! Taylor is the better boxer, has much more hand-speed. Taylor also has the power to hurt Pavlik as he shown in the first fight. I believe in the rematch Taylor will win and will win by a stunning knockout of Pavlik.




WAR TAYLOR!!!!:bears: :bears: :bears:Honestly, Taylor ISN'T:nono: ...

Pavlik is More TECHNICALLY Sound by a MILE...His JAB is Superior, his "1-2" is Basic, yet EFFECTIVE (MORE Consistently Effective than Anything Taylor has)...& Pavlik has a WIDER Variety of Punches @ his Disposal...

Taylor's ONLY Advantage is HANDSPEED, which is NEGATED by Pavlik's JAB & TIMING...

Jermain Taylor DOESN'T Have the Trainer or Boxing Smarts to Make the Necessary ADJUSTMENTS to Beat Pavlik...

Pavlik's just BETTER...


REED:cool:

REEDsART
01-31-2008, 11:43 AM
I think Taylor has a good chance. He is a very talented athleteU Gotta Be Kidding??!!


REED:lol:

ArturoGatti
01-31-2008, 11:57 AM
U Gotta Be Kidding??!!


REED:lol::dunno:

Iif nothing else, he is a good athlete.

dsimon3387
01-31-2008, 11:58 AM
U Gotta Be Kidding??!!


REED:lol:

dsimon writes:

Ugo is pissing in the right direction. Taylor gets by on strength and on some athletic ability more than any boxing ability.

Pavlik is the opposite in that he gets by on being a fighter and on great pressuring technique.

Taylor is overmatched any way you look at it though. he can't overpower Pavlik, can't take him in deep water with technical skills and he isn't stronger than Pavlik.

Taylor does not have a lot of finesse but he has athletic ability primarily in the form of strength.

Ugotabe Kidding
01-31-2008, 12:02 PM
dsimon writes:

Ugo is pissing in the right direction. Taylor gets by on strength and on some athletic ability more than any boxing ability.

Pavlik is the opposite in that he gets by on being a fighter and on great pressuring technique.

Exactly. I think Taylor could be succesful in many sports, more so than Pavlik

REEDsART
01-31-2008, 12:03 PM
:dunno:

Iif nothing else, he is a good athlete.REED just Can't See it...

Especially for an African-American Fighter, Jermain Taylor LACKS Athleticism...

He has DECENT Handspeed, but that's about it...He's FLAT-FOOTED,his Footwork is CLUMSY, he's UNcoordinated...

"Good Athletes" have a Level of FLUIDITY that Taylor Clearly LACKS...REED Could List a Boatload of African American Fighters who R SUPERIOR Athletes...

Ricky Hatton is a SUPERIOR Athlete...Jason Litzau is a SUPERIOR Athlete...


REED:cool:

dsimon3387
01-31-2008, 12:05 PM
Exactly. I think Taylor could be succesful in many sports, more so than Pavlik

dsimon writes:

He would be a great wrestler. He has freakish strength, it allowed him to keep bernard from destroying him inside. He was about the only guy to physically throw Bernard around in that area, even if he was getting hit by Bernard's punches in the process. This strength inside is why Bernard was so measured in their fights. I think Bernard won both fights but was more careful because of this strength.

dsimon3387
01-31-2008, 12:10 PM
REED just Can't See it...

Especially for an African-American Fighter, Jermain Taylor LACKS Athleticism...

He has DECENT Handspeed, but that's about it...He's FLAT-FOOTED,his Footwork is CLUMSY, he's UNcoordinated...

"Good Athletes" have a Level of FLUIDITY that Taylor Clearly LACKS...REED Could List a Boatload of African American Fighters who R SUPERIOR Athletes...

Ricky Hatton is a SUPERIOR Athlete...Jason Litzau is a SUPERIOR Athlete...


REED:cool:

dsimon writes:

What you seem to be saying is that he lacks finesse. I agree with that. There is a tendency to ascribe to African American Athletes the quality of finesse, i.e. body intelligence and Taylor is not that kind of athlete.

KaukipRrr
01-31-2008, 12:18 PM
Taylor appears to make Uncle-Tom's as quickly as Fraud makes cock-nibbling psycophants :dunno: ,.. I think it's rather suprising, the flagrant disrespect, resentment? perhaps, shown towards Bernard Hopkins father, and you can say that, again. Jermaine made no excuses for his first professional loss, he absorbed it like a man, and is doing what a gutsy fighter does by taking the immediate rematch, I believe the conduct and goodwill shown by boxing's most prudent ambassador, shall be rewarded with an early knockout victory over the white-american, who's name I have forgotten, but his race and ethnicity, is certainly one hell of an oman.

Erratic
01-31-2008, 12:39 PM
Agreed with Taylor not being too fluid and not the most coordinated of fighters. He does have some athleticism though. He's not the most technically sound of guys, he didn't fight at roughly an even level with great boxers such as Hopkins and Wright because he could match technical skills with them. It took some of his athleticism (and his determination) as well.

Wasn't he a good track runner in high school also?

Orthodox Crusader
01-31-2008, 12:43 PM
REED just Can't See it...

Especially for an African-American Fighter, Jermain Taylor LACKS Athleticism...

He has DECENT Handspeed, but that's about it...He's FLAT-FOOTED,his Footwork is CLUMSY, he's UNcoordinated...

"Good Athletes" have a Level of FLUIDITY that Taylor Clearly LACKS...REED Could List a Boatload of African American Fighters who R SUPERIOR Athletes...

Ricky Hatton is a SUPERIOR Athlete...Jason Litzau is a SUPERIOR Athlete...


REED:cool:


And they are white, which says it all, really.



























:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Hex-One
01-31-2008, 12:50 PM
I think Taylor has a good chance. He is a very talented athleteAgreed! Taylor is a very good fighter. Alot of people are underestimating him here. This is a very winnable fight for Taylor if he can correct the mistakes me made in the first fight. Pavlik is slow and a sloppy fighter.

Hex-One
01-31-2008, 12:52 PM
U Gotta Be Kidding??!!


REED:lol: You don't beat Bernard Hopkins if your not gifted. Taylor is a very good boxer. He will prove alot you you wrong and I CANT WAIT.

REEDsART
01-31-2008, 12:55 PM
And they are white, which says it all, really.



























:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:Surprise, Surprise...O.C. MISSED the Fucking Point...




























AGAIN!!...

REED:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Orthodox Crusader
01-31-2008, 12:58 PM
Surprise, Surprise...O.C. MISSED the Fucking Point...




























AGAIN!!...

REED:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


Oh, I thought the point was that if a white guy is a better athlete than a black guy, that the black guy must be a really shitty athlete??

Isn't that the point you wanted to make about Taylor??

No??

:rolleyes: :cool:

REEDsART
01-31-2008, 12:59 PM
You don't beat Bernard Hopkins if your not gifted. Taylor is a very good boxer. He will prove alot you you wrong and I CANT WAIT.1st of All, Taylor Arguably LOST to Bernard Both Times...

2nd, he Beat a 40 Year Old, 10 Punch per Round Bernard, NOT a PRIME "Executioner":nono: ...

If Taylor is "Gifted", it's BARELY...


REED:cool:

Hex-One
01-31-2008, 01:07 PM
1st of All, Taylor Arguably LOST to Bernard Both Times...

2nd, he Beat a 40 Year Old, 10 Punch per Round Bernard, NOT a PRIME "Executioner":nono: ...

If Taylor is "Gifted", it's BARELY...


REED:cool: Bullshit! Weather B-Hop won them fights or not Taylor made it very competetive. I personally thought Taylor won 1 out of the 2 fights. A argument can be made. Also I sick and tired about this Hopkins is not in his prime crap! Let's look at the facts. After the 2 fights with Taylor, Hopkins went on and DOMINATED Antonio Tarver @Light Heavyweight and beat Wright who hasn't lost in a decade. Who has been able to clearly beat Hopkins until this day? :nono: Weather he was or not he is still a damn good fighter until this day!

REEDsART
01-31-2008, 01:10 PM
Oh, I thought the point was that if a white guy is a better athlete than a black guy, that the black guy must be a really shitty athlete??

Isn't that the point you wanted to make about Taylor??

No??

:rolleyes: :cool:Allow REED to SPELL it OUT for U (& Feel FREE to Re-REED from the BEGINNING if/when U Get LOST)...

Jermain Taylor IS NOT a Good Athlete:nono: ...

w/a SMALL # of Exceptions, African-American Fighters R GENERALLY Good Athletes (Do U DISagree???:dunno: )...Even if they're NOT Terribly Good FIGHTERS, their ATHLETICISM is Usually APPARENT...

Jermain Taylor is UNathletic as it Pertains to the Typical African-American Fighter...

A SMALLER # of White Fighters R Known for their Athleticism Compared to the # of African American Fighters (Do U DISagree???:dunno: )...

Instead of Listing the Aforementioned "Boatload" of African-American Fighters w/SUPERIOR Athleticism to Taylor's, REED Did the WHITE Thing, Pointing Out Lighter Hued Brethren w/SUPERIOR Athleticism...

Hatton, Litzau...Hell, Add Wlad Klit as Well...These Guys R BETTER Athletes than Quite a Few African Americans (to Varying Degrees), but their Athletic Ability Absolutely SHITs on Taylor's...

For the Sake of BREVITY, REED listed White Fighters as Opposed to the "Boatload" of African-American Fighters...

Got It???


REED:rolleyes:

Orthodox Crusader
01-31-2008, 01:14 PM
Allow REED to SPELL it OUT for U (& Feel FREE to Re-REED from the BEGINNING if/when U Get LOST)...

Jermain Taylor IS NOT a Good Athlete:nono: ...

w/a SMALL # of Exceptions, African-American Fighters R GENERALLY Good Athletes (Do U DISagree???:dunno: )...Even if they're NOT Terribly Good FIGHTERS, their ATHLETICISM is Usually APPARENT...

Jermain Taylor is UNathletic as it Pertains to the Typical African-American Fighter...

A SMALLER # of White Fighters R Known for their Athleticism Compared to the # of African American Fighters (Do U DISagree???:dunno: )...

Instead of Listing the Aforementioned "Boatload" of African-American Fighters w/SUPERIOR Athleticism to Taylor's, REED Did the WHITE Thing, Pointing Out Lighter Hued Brethren w/SUPERIOR Athleticism...

Hatton, Litzau...Hell, Add Wlad Klit as Well...These Guys R BETTER Athletes than Quite a Few African Americans (to Varying Degrees), but their Athletic Ability Absolutely SHITs on Taylor's...

For the Sake of BREVITY, REED listed White Fighters as Opposed to the "Boatload" of African-American Fighters...

Got It???


REED:rolleyes:


Yeah I get it. You wanted to highlight Taylors lack of athleticism by showing there are white guys with more athleticism. Because that really puts it in context. Shit, I knew that the first time.

Why did you not just say that Taylors athleticism is shit, period??

Erratic
01-31-2008, 01:20 PM
Agreed! Taylor is a very good fighter. Alot of people are underestimating him here. This is a very winnable fight for Taylor if he can correct the mistakes me made in the first fight. Pavlik is slow and a sloppy fighter.

Taylor is sloppier than Pavlik.

REEDsART
01-31-2008, 01:24 PM
Bullshit! Weather B-Hop won them fights or not Taylor made it very competetive. I personally thought Taylor won 1 out of the 2 fights. A argument can be made. Also I sick and tired about this Hopkins is not in his prime crap! Let's look at the facts. After the 2 fights with Taylor, Hopkins went on and DOMINATED Antonio Tarver @Light Heavyweight and beat Wright who hasn't lost in a decade. Who has been able to clearly beat Hopkins until this day? :nono: Weather he was or not he is still a damn good fighter until this day!CLEARLY, Bernard Hopkins HAS NOT Been the Same Fighter Since Probably 2001 (The Tito Fight)...

Just Cause he's Mustered Up an Impressive Win or 2 DOESN'T All of a Sudden Make him VINTAGE Bernard Anymore:nono: ...

Taylor Arguably LOST to a 40 Year Old Bernard, @ a Weight Bernard DIDN'T Need to Compete @ Anymore...That's Why Bernard MOVED UP 2 Weight Classes Afterwards...

Not Really Sure WHAT U have Against Kelly Pavlik, but he's Simply BETTER than Jermain Taylor...

DEAL w/It...


REED:cool:

REEDsART
01-31-2008, 01:25 PM
Yeah I get it. You wanted to highlight Taylors lack of athleticism by showing there are white guys with more athleticism. Because that really puts it in context. Shit, I knew that the first time.

Why did you not just say that Taylors athleticism is shit, period??REED DID Say that...


REED:doh:

Orthodox Crusader
01-31-2008, 01:33 PM
REED DID Say that...


REED:doh:


Then why bring Litzau and Hatton into it, unless you were looking for context. Why not just say "JT is a poor athlete"...we would have understood that. We know what poor athletes look like, black or otherwise.

REEDsART
01-31-2008, 01:35 PM
Taylor is sloppier than Pavlik.MUCH...

Pavlik is CONSIDERABLY More ACCURATE, CONTROLLED & PRECISE w/his Delivery...

He's just SLOW...

Just Cause Taylor's BLACK, Peeps ASSume he's "Athletic", "Fast", a "Good Boxer" & Whatnot...On the FLIPSIDE, just Cause Pavlik is WHITE, Peeps ASSume he's "Sloppy", a "Brawler" & "Can't Box"...

Taylor has a HANDSPEED Advantage Over Pavlik (& that's ALL), but that DOESN'T Mean Taylor is "Fast"...

REED:cool:

REEDsART
01-31-2008, 01:37 PM
Then why bring Litzau and Hatton into it, unless you were looking for context. Why not just say "JT is a poor athlete"...we would have understood that. We know what poor athletes look like, black or otherwise.Because the Pool of "Athletic" White Fighters is Smaller than the Pool of "Athletic" Black Fighters...

Did U MISS the Part where REED said "Boatloads"???...This is like 4th or 5th Time REED has Used the Word Now...


REED:doh:

Orthodox Crusader
01-31-2008, 01:37 PM
MUCH...

Pavlik is CONSIDERABLY More ACCURATE, CONTROLLED & PRECISE w/his Delivery...

He's just SLOW...

Just Cause Taylor's BLACK, Peeps ASSume he's "Athletic", "Fast", a "Good Boxer" & Whatnot...On the FLIPSIDE, just Cause Pavlik is WHITE, Peeps ASSume he's "Sloppy", a "Brawler" & "Can't Box"...

Taylor has a HANDSPEED Advantage Over Pavlik (& that's ALL), but that DOESN'T Mean Taylor is "Fast"...

REED:cool:


Obviously none of these people watch Olympic Gymnastics.

Ugotabe Kidding
01-31-2008, 01:39 PM
MUCH...

Pavlik is CONSIDERABLY More ACCURATE, CONTROLLED & PRECISE w/his Delivery...

He's just SLOW...

Just Cause Taylor's BLACK, Peeps ASSume he's "Athletic", "Fast", a "Good Boxer" & Whatnot...On the FLIPSIDE, just Cause Pavlik is WHITE, Peeps ASSume he's "Sloppy", a "Brawler" & "Can't Box"...

Taylor has a HANDSPEED Advantage Over Pavlik (& that's ALL), but that DOESN'T Mean Taylor is "Fast"...

REED:cool:

Not all people see world that way

Double L
01-31-2008, 01:47 PM
Pavlik does a good job making up for his less than spectacular hand-speed by keeping his punches short and throwing in combination.

He's also good at parrying shots; better than most give him credit for. Especially when you consider that he doesn't compromise himself offensively, hardly at all, when he goes on defense.

Also, like Tito, he seems to have good instincts about distance - where he can be, and where he wants to be with respect to his opponents position. And you will see him throw short left hooks and long ones.

Also, he understands the power of the jab. Unlike Taylor, who uses the jab to do damage (and largely to buy time), Pavlik understands that the jab's biggest strength is its ability to set up big shots - shots that otherwise couldn't get through.

cpa5oh
01-31-2008, 05:52 PM
I don't know how anyone can dislike either guy in this fight. They both seem to be real good guys. Taylor really handled his loss like a man.

I like Taylor to beat on Pavlik like he did early and this time finish him. I thought he looked great early on in that fight and will look the same the entire fight this time.

I hate the fact that this is non-title and at a catch weight.

Xplosive
01-31-2008, 07:42 PM
Now that the Pavlik dick sucking bandwagon has been posted yet again, I thought why not the Taylor Bandwagon? I will tell you this, alot of people are setting themselves up to be shocked again! Taylor is the better boxer, has much more hand-speed. Taylor also has the power to hurt Pavlik as he shown in the first fight. I believe in the rematch Taylor will win and will win by a stunning knockout of Pavlik.




WAR TAYLOR!!!!:bears: :bears: :bears:

You picking Taylor guarantees that Pavlik will smoke him again. I'm even MORE confident in my pick now.

Xplosive
01-31-2008, 07:46 PM
REED just Can't See it...

Especially for an African-American Fighter, Jermain Taylor LACKS Athleticism...

He has DECENT Handspeed, but that's about it...He's FLAT-FOOTED,his Footwork is CLUMSY, he's UNcoordinated...

"Good Athletes" have a Level of FLUIDITY that Taylor Clearly LACKS...REED Could List a Boatload of African American Fighters who R SUPERIOR Athletes...

Ricky Hatton is a SUPERIOR Athlete...Jason Litzau is a SUPERIOR Athlete...


REED:cool:

Afuckinmen to this! I been saying that shit for years! Taylor is so overrated as an athlete its not even funny.

RJ, Zab, Floyd, Shane..... THOSE guys are great athletes! They have blazing handspeed, fast feet, good coordination, and great reflexes(in thier primes anyway). Like you said all that Taylor has going for him is above average handspeed. His feet are pretty slow, and he's uncoordinated, and his reflexes suck. He aint no goddamn great athlete!

ILLUMINATI
01-31-2008, 07:49 PM
some here act as if Pavlik is some unstoppable machine...but i remember him getting hurt/wobble/did a Cotto vs. Corley dance..and then drop in his fight with Taylor......



but at the end PAVLIK by KO 7...same outcome...whatever Taylor do..he will get KO..if he tries to holdback and box..he gets KO'ed..if he comes out swinging look for the early KO...he will get Ko'ed....

Xplosive
01-31-2008, 07:52 PM
Pavlik does a good job making up for his less than spectacular hand-speed by keeping his punches short and throwing in combination.

He's also good at parrying shots; better than most give him credit for. Especially when you consider that he doesn't compromise himself offensively, hardly at all, when he goes on defense.

Also, like Tito, he seems to have good instincts about distance - where he can be, and where he wants to be with respect to his opponents position. And you will see him throw short left hooks and long ones.

Also, he understands the power of the jab. Unlike Taylor, who uses the jab to do damage (and largely to buy time), Pavlik understands that the jab's biggest strength is its ability to set up big shots - shots that otherwise couldn't get through.

Good post.

*Z*
01-31-2008, 08:51 PM
Hex-One has hate in his heart. I think he's racist.

Hex-One
01-31-2008, 09:37 PM
Hex-One has hate in his heart. I think he's racist.:nono:

Double L
01-31-2008, 09:43 PM
Good post.

thanks man!!! :cheer:

ArturoGatti
01-31-2008, 10:40 PM
:nono:name ONE white fighter you like!!!

KaukipRrr
01-31-2008, 11:08 PM
Just Cause Taylor's BLACK, Peeps ASSume he's "Athletic", "Fast", a "Good Boxer" ...On the FLIPSIDE, just Cause Pavlik is WHITE, Peeps ASSume he's "Sloppy", a "Brawler" & "Can't Box"...

REED:cool:

:crafty: ahh haaa,..? is that so,..liking Pavlik sure comes with an establishment first, :crafty: perhaps your on my side, and are just wearing that symbolic wagon like silicon tits, but I'm fine, there's no such thing as a white sellout, welcome back Reed :bears: as I say to all Fraud groupies, the truth, shall set you free.

LOK
02-01-2008, 09:56 AM
Honestly, Taylor ISN'T:nono: ...

Pavlik is More TECHNICALLY Sound by a MILE...His JAB is Superior, his "1-2" is Basic, yet EFFECTIVE (MORE Consistently Effective than Anything Taylor has)...& Pavlik has a WIDER Variety of Punches @ his Disposal...

Taylor's ONLY Advantage is HANDSPEED, which is NEGATED by Pavlik's JAB & TIMING...

Jermain Taylor DOESN'T Have the Trainer or Boxing Smarts to Make the Necessary ADJUSTMENTS to Beat Pavlik...

Pavlik's just BETTER...


REED:cool:

You are right on point as usual brother REED

Pavlik is the better fighter... you know, the simple ONE-TWO is very very effective when people do it well and he does.

Cheo Malanga
02-01-2008, 11:07 AM
I think the main attribute Pavlick has in there is how relax he is. Even when he was hurt and knocked down, he never seemed to panick and did what he had to do.

You look at Taylor in the opposite corner and you have a nervous fighter who never looks at ease in the ring. I learned a long time ago to pick the relaxed fighter.

Ugotabe Kidding
02-01-2008, 11:16 AM
Afuckinmen to this! I been saying that shit for years! Taylor is so overrated as an athlete its not even funny.

RJ, Zab, Floyd, Shane..... THOSE guys are great athletes! They have blazing handspeed, fast feet, good coordination, and great reflexes(in thier primes anyway). Like you said all that Taylor has going for him is above average handspeed. His feet are pretty slow, and he's uncoordinated, and his reflexes suck. He aint no goddamn great athlete!

So what do you think was the reason he did so well against Hopkins and Wright who both are much more technically sound boxers?

Being a good athlete is more than being flashy

Hex-One
02-01-2008, 11:44 AM
Is anyone here picking Taylor to win besides me?:doh: WTF???

dymipepel
02-01-2008, 12:42 PM
Is anyone here picking Taylor to win besides me?:doh: WTF???

Kauki is.....which basically means Taylor is going to get brutalized even more than he was in the first fight.....

LOK
02-01-2008, 12:48 PM
Taylor is gonna get KTFO

maybe this will make him more likeable

Xplosive
02-01-2008, 12:59 PM
So what do you think was the reason he did so well against Hopkins and Wright who both are much more technically sound boxers?

Being a good athlete is more than being flashy

His youth, size, and energy, and above average handspeed.

cpa5oh
02-01-2008, 01:24 PM
Is anyone here picking Taylor to win besides me?:doh: WTF???

I am.

Xplosive
02-01-2008, 01:28 PM
Is anyone here picking Taylor to win besides me?:doh: WTF???

I'm sure all those who were picking Taylor changed thier picks after you opened this thread.

D MAN
02-01-2008, 05:12 PM
Yep

Taylor already showed he can mess up Pavlik big time. The first fight COULD have been stopped in the 2nd round and it would probably be evenly split on whether or not it was a good stoppage...

*Z*
02-01-2008, 05:37 PM
Yep

Taylor already showed he can mess up Pavlik big time. The first fight COULD have been stopped in the 2nd round and it would probably be evenly split on whether or not it was a good stoppage...

It would have been a very bad stoppage. At what point would it have been ok to stop the fight in the second round? The only KD Pavlik was up and on steady legs before the ref even finished getting Taylor to a neutral corner. By the time he turned back to Pavlik he was up and ready to go. He got tagged again and was wobbly but did the right thing and held on. I don't see any point in that round where it would have been ok to stop it. Pavlik was fine by the end of the round.

dsimon3387
02-01-2008, 07:43 PM
So what do you think was the reason he did so well against Hopkins and Wright who both are much more technically sound boxers?

Being a good athlete is more than being flashy

dsimon writes:

Taylor is very strong. Reed is right imo. Truth is if Taylor's fights had been scored properly he could have conceviably lost all 3 of those fights, that has to be considered, especially because of the last round of the first fight.

dsimon3387
02-01-2008, 07:44 PM
Taylor is gonna get KTFO

maybe this will make him more likeable

Dsimon writes:

:lol: :lol:

Taylor, Kauki and Hexy can all be likable together when it happens. I think Hex and Kauki in their persistant wrongness makes them very likable posters.

Hex-One
02-01-2008, 08:43 PM
Dsimon writes:

:lol: :lol:

Taylor, Kauki and Hexy can all be likable together when it happens. I think Hex and Kauki in their persistant wrongness makes them very likable posters.:lol: I have been wrong as of late in my predictions:doh:

LATIN KING
02-02-2008, 03:18 AM
Pavlik should beat TAylor. But still Taylor put Pavlik in queer street which is overlook because he couldn't finish him.

Funny thing is Taylor managed to do that to Pavlik the most dangerous fighter he has fought while he coulldn't do that to the smaller fighters he was facing before. :dunno:

Even if he got Kod Taylor he knows Pavlik didn't dominate the fight and has to know he could hurt Pavlik.

I haven't seen Pavlik that much but in the few fights I've seen of him he never came close to being that hurt. Hell even he admits he made alot of mistakes.

All i'm saying is let's not forget Taylor had his moments in there and it will be interesting to see if he can do something with that or if it won't matter.

Roll With The Punches
02-03-2008, 07:01 AM
http://i32.tinypic.com/2saxuaa.jpg

Hex-One
02-03-2008, 10:29 AM
http://i32.tinypic.com/2saxuaa.jpg Funny pic:lol: but back to the fight, JT will win this fight! Nothing against Pavlik, he is a strong fighter but my predictions remains intact! JT by UD.:bears: Like TO says, get your popcorn ready.

REEDsART
02-03-2008, 11:30 AM
Does Anybody Else Find it FUNNY that Taylor is BORROWING Pavlik's Training Techniques N an Effort to BEAT Pavlik???:dunno:


REED:lol:

meetthefeebles
02-03-2008, 11:57 AM
Does Anybody Else Find it FUNNY that Taylor is BORROWING Pavlik's Training Techniques N an Effort to BEAT Pavlik???:dunno:


REED:lol:

He'd be better off trying to borrow Pavlik's straight right hand... :popcorn:

Orthodox Crusader
02-03-2008, 01:42 PM
There is no such thing as borrowing training techniques.