Huge, 250lb, 6'7" modern behemoth (but limited) vs the much smaller all time great from 100 years ago.
Who wins?
Huge, 250lb, 6'7" modern behemoth (but limited) vs the much smaller all time great from 100 years ago.
Who wins?
I think these type of threads have been well covered recently. Everybody will say 'Grant with ease since he knew how to throw a proper punch without half falling over'. Then Ramonza will chime in saying he's shocked since Jack Johnson is an all time great and Michael Grant never even won a title.
Grant, obviously.
Grant's downfall was his lack of technical abilities, yet his technique was supreme compared to anyone who fought at Johnson's era, and his physical abilities were formidable. Grant wins in very easy fashion
Originally Posted by "Pascals Wager"
Jack Johnson wins clearly. Size only matters to a point...
By the way, was Jack Johnson the ugliest heavyweight champion ever after Carnera? That's one oddly shaped skull. If you created it on fightnight create a champ, it'd look like a program glitch.
Any other contenders?
Didn't Valuev have some disorder that made his skull super thick? Kinda a real world correlate to Homer Simpson syndrome or some shit. I'm not sure he should have been allowed to compete, that seems like an unfair advantage to me.
Grant easy cmon. If Grant fought in the black and white era he would be considered an all time great.
Life is good
Michael Grant in the era of 4 ounce gloves is still a recipe for disaster, mind. Jack Dempsey for instance would still probably knock 9 of his teeth out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks