Could be happening soon. Mayweather should fight Brook in London, I think the fight will happen now. MAyweather has wanted some english cock up his back door for some time now. I think Kell could give him the full amount of inches, if Mayweather has the raisins to fight him in London.
Stupid thread. Mayweather doesn't like travelling for any fighter, why would he want to travel for a nobody like Brook? Whereas Brook would jump at the chance to fight Mayweather anywhere he chose.
I hope you weren't serious about Brook giving Floyd trouble. Brook doesn't have the style to bother Floyd. Floyd would light Brook up.
Brook's not a pressure fighter. He's a methodical counter puncher. Nobody's gonna out think Floyd. The key to beating the old man is gonna be pressure. Not Brook's style.
Maidana doesn't give a fuck. He isn't afraid to be rough and dirty. And considering Floyd's legs aren't as good as they once were, and his and trigger isn't as quick as it once was, it was a tough fight for him. Brook is patient, and he would give Floyd time to think. And if you lay back and give Floyd time to think, you get picked apart. See Canelo.
Surely Irish is trolling. Why would Floyd want to come to England to fight some sqeaky voiced mook like Brook? Brook would be a much easier fight for Floyd than Maidana.
Floyd wants to come to England. He's a man-child, he wants that adulation, to do something Ray Robinson did.
I'm surprised at that The guy I saw on Saturday looks like absolute shite I'd favor Maidana easily over either of those mooks
Brook is a good deal better than Broner. So I'm not sure about him "absolutely battering" Brook. Maidana is still a scrub.
Maidana ' s a scrub? Not letting that idiotic statement go without correcting... Maidana would Ko Thurman.
Here's a question. Who in their right mind would've watched Saturday's fight and then thought to himself, hey, this Brook guy...I'm looking forward to his next fight? The only one is the guy, like me, hoping to see him get knocked out when he tries that game again.
I also don't see how Brook is a good deal better than broner did we watch the same fight?? The guy I saw on saturday was a boxbot who holds like an octopus
Yes, Brook is clearly better than Broner. Brook is bigger than Broner, he hits harder, he's more accurate, and he can actually counterpunch. For some ODD reason you and Double are pretending that ALLLL Brook did was hold, ignoring the fact he was bouncing right hands off Porter's face all night long. Broner can't counterpunch for shit. BTW - you guys really sound like some cynical bastards lately. It seems like to you, Porter's a scrub, Brook's a scrub, Thurman's a scrub. SOMEHOW, you give Maidana a pass (despite the fact he's a career scrub). Who's NOT a scrub in your book exactly?
Maidana just gave one of the best challenges in years to the best fighter in the sport What exactly has Thurman done by comparison? Brook? Porter? You're calling Maidana a scrub but Thurman is awesome? Based off of what exactly? Soto-Karass? Brook holding Porter was a key element in his victory... It was obvious to most of us watching... He barely won, as it was... Your 8-4 card certainly didn't seem to jibe with the rest of us watching the fight... As you say, Porter isn't good, so why would an unimpressive decision over him propel Brook to some high level? Maidana goes 12 with Mayweather and gets his licks in and he's a scrub but Thurman beats Soto-Karass and Julio Fucking Diaz and he's awesome
Nobody was predicting Maidana to do a goddamn thing against Floyd. It's not as if he was expected to be competitive. So therefore, who are you to say that Thurman couldn't also have success against the old man? And you bring up Soto Karass, but because what? Thurman and Maidana both fought Soto Karass, and Thurman beat him more impressively.
I think X is backed into a corner where he HAS to call Maidana a "scrub." He constantly trashes Khan and Alexander like they're garbage men and they both have a W over Maidana.