Is it possible...

yeah, cause he was an old fat unmotivated guy

 

Because he wasn't a particularly good fighter

 

You are the only guy that thinks this though as has been established the previous 900 times you've made this claim

Rahman would've caught a beating from Vitaly

 

word.

 

Sure, Rahman was so bad that he only would have been the best win on Vitaly resume (had Vitaly actually fought him when a doctor cleared him)

 

If you were a talented fighter and you easily blasted Reggie Strickland, 2004 Meldrick Taylor, 1998 Roberto Duran and Joe Gatti but never fought Dana Rosenblatt, it wouldn't mean that the idea of Dana Rosenblatt defeating you is any less stupid just because he'd be "the best" of those guys

 

Claiming that Rahman had no shot at beating VK is beyond retarded considering he beat a much better fighter than him in LL.

And I know that considering the averageh memory of posters here (barely above goldfish level), it's too much to ask to rebember some events that occured more than a year ago, but at the time, pretty much everybody were saying that vitaly actions were very fishy at best

 

Rahman did beat Lennox Lewis...but it was a one punch knockout. Shit like that happens in boxing. It’s bit like he was out fighting him. Had he fought Lennox 100 tines that would have been his only win. Chances of him coldcocking Vitali are one in a thousand.

 

yeah, cause Vitaly really proved he was such an invincible fighters in his wins over the cream of the division. Let's be honest, guy looked like absolute shit against Byrd, vulnerable against Sanders, and while he looked good against the oldest and fattest LL ever, he still lost the fight.

Rahman would have been by far his best win. Let that sink in

 

Dude if you think Rahman would've done shit besides eat jabs and get slowly beat to shit by Vitali, you need your head examined ... Rahman was a mediocre fighter who lucked out when an overconfident, out of shape champion with an unreliable chin failed to take him seriously (he failed to do so because Rahman wasn't very good) and was irresponsible defensively

I wish there was a time machine so we could somehow make that fight happen and I'd bet you and your brother 10 grand each that Vitali wins

Vitali was always in shape, as Lennox was in his rematch with Rahman when he did what he should've done the first time - knock the shit out of a guy that had no business in the ring with him

 

"Vulnerable against Sanders"... ... he beat the daylights out of him

Rahman damned near got knocked out by Sanders and did get knocked out by Oleg Maskaev for fuck's sake

 

yeah vitaly was so much better than Rahman that he lost to an even worst version than the one Rahman KTFO

anyway, who cares about who would have won. It doesn't change the fact that Vitaly ducked him

 

No he didn't ... this is a fantasy of yours we've all been laughing at for years, like most of your posts

 

yeah, c ause postponing a fight 4 times (even if a doctor said he was fit to fight), and scheduling another fight in the meantime, is pretty standard business.

the stupidity in here would be funny if it wasn't so sad

 

Yeah he retired for four years because he was scared of a borderline journeyman with multiple KO losses to Oleg Maskaev t

You are an absolute idiot

 

he didn't have multiple losses to maskaev at the time you simpleton

 

The second loss was what, 2006?

What year did Vitali come back?

He should've come back right after that to get the Rahman monkey off his back ... the fight demanded by everyone... and by everyone, I mean two guys from Quebec