Best fighters today?

Discussion in 'General Boxing Discussion' started by Hut*Hut, Feb 23, 2011.

  1. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,275
    Likes Received:
    6,189
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    This is just like you Ramonza - coming into to discussions of modern fighters and bringing the past into everything. Bert Sugar wannabe. :pissed::lol:
     
  2. Mitchell Kane

    Mitchell Kane WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    11,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    You don't think Ali and Foreman could take the Klitschko's today?
     
  3. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    5,905
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ah, fvck :lol:
     
  4. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    5,905
    Likes Received:
    3
    I would find it less offensive if you could be so kind as to compare my alleged shoe-horning to Max Kellerman :lol:
     
  5. mexican wedding shirt

    mexican wedding shirt The Greatest of Are Times

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    28,647
    Likes Received:
    283
    I'm amazed you don't have Ward as top 5 Hut, who you seem to be exceptionally high on.

    It's good you don't though, because he's not in the same league as Donaire or even Martinez.

    But Hut, Pirog? Really Pirog? Top 5 P4P? Really? Really? Why?

    1) Pacquiao (Come on Jake, even based purely on ability, Donaire hasn't proven to be as good or better than Pacquiao. I think Nonito himself would acknowledge this).

    2) Donaire (No question he is number 2. Destroying supposedly evenly matched foes, making them look outclasses and brutally KOing them).

    3) Martinez (Again, pretty clear number 3 for me. Skilled, athletic, solid fighter, with 2 very nice recent wins).

    4) Bradley (Solid but unspectular as I keep saying. But REALLY solid. Looked sloppier than usual against Devon, but still got the job done pretty easily. Has the intagible winning qualities, mentally tough and determined.)

    5) Marquez (Obviously old, past his best, and past his weight class, but his sheer skill and craft enable him to be a dominant champion against younger, bigger guys).

    Vitali and Wlad simply don't count, sorry. Both skilled and dominant, but how effective would they be if they were the same size as their opponents? We simply don't know. My guess is not as effective, so they're not really good P4P candidates.
     
  6. TLC

    TLC "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,559
    Likes Received:
    1
    This isn't a p4p thread.
     
  7. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,275
    Likes Received:
    6,189
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    yes it is
     
  8. TLC

    TLC "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,559
    Likes Received:
    1
    Well you didn't specify at all. You simply said "best".

    Which can be interpreted much differently.
     
  9. TLC

    TLC "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,559
    Likes Received:
    1
    Just saw Donaire fight....dude is huge.

    Could easily be fighting at 130, maybe even 135.
     
  10. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,275
    Likes Received:
    6,189
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    How?
     
  11. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,275
    Likes Received:
    6,189
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    You judge guys relative to their division, surely. Above 200lb, everyone is a 'heavyweight', doesn't matter if they're 201 or 450.
     
  12. TLC

    TLC "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,559
    Likes Received:
    1
    Because it takes the whole weight thing out of the equation.
     
  13. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,275
    Likes Received:
    6,189
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    I dunno if you're trying to fuck with my head, but please try and make sense if you're gonna rely to my posts it's late here. I didn't say best heavyweights I said best fighters in the sport, then gave a list of 5 fighters from all different weights.
     
  14. TLC

    TLC "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,559
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best fighters in the sport.


    Not best fighters p4p in the sport.

    Big difference.
     
  15. mexican wedding shirt

    mexican wedding shirt The Greatest of Are Times

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    28,647
    Likes Received:
    283
    I'm wondering if TLC literally doesn't understand the concept of a P4P list.

    Best = P4P really. If you're the best fighter in the sport, it just means you're the best of any weight class, ie the best P4P, and judged on ability rather than accomplishments.

    BTW Hut you didn't justify your rather insane pick of Pirog.
     
  16. mexican wedding shirt

    mexican wedding shirt The Greatest of Are Times

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    28,647
    Likes Received:
    283
    TLC don't be a fucking idiot.

    Nobody is going to think best in the sport means best heavyweight, otherwise you'd simply state best in the HW division.

    Best in the sport means best out of any weightclass in terms of their respective weightclass.
     
  17. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,275
    Likes Received:
    6,189
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    I dont need to justify it, that was meant to be the point in this thread, to allow scope for unorthodox choices rather than everyone just giving the same old predictable answer. Eyes and opinions. He looks top drawer to me.
     
  18. mexican wedding shirt

    mexican wedding shirt The Greatest of Are Times

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    28,647
    Likes Received:
    283

    Something like that is just silly though. He's beaten Daniel Jacobs. Even if it is ability rather than accomplishments, you need to be more proven than that.

    The guy looks like a good, solid, aggressive boxer puncher, but one of the 5 best fighters in ther world, really?

    Incidentally, isn't Jim Watt a total fucktard? Hard to imagine he was actually a pro boxer.

    Against Jacobs - "There's nothing subtle or clever about Pirog's approach".

    This is said simultaneously to Pirog using excellent footwork to stay in Jacob's face, feinting, dodging 90% of Jacob's punches with nice head movement, and landing some nice counters of his own :lol:
     
  19. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,275
    Likes Received:
    6,189
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    I detest Jim Watt with a throbbing passion. As for the thread I thought a little silliness might be diverting.
     
  20. loadedgloves

    loadedgloves "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    6,945
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have no problem with being high on Pirog. Daniel Jacobs is not a bad fighter and Pirog put a clinic on him prior to flattening him. That was clearly no fluke performance.
     

Share This Page