No, he was a Judoka but he never participated in modern Pro Wrestling. And he wasn't a pro wrestler first and a Judo master second like you made it sound. Come on, even you understand that what Maeda did pre 1940 was nothing like pro wrestling today. As I said, crazy stretch even for SD.
To be fair, I didn't bring him up. I haven't really stooped to anything. I've been making points that you've been pretending (I hope your pretending) to not understand.
You have brough up more ridiculous things throughout the course of this debate. So it seemed more like your style.
I posted the only info I could find online. I asked you to post better info. You haven't. As I said, I'm sure you're just pretending to not understand these simple things.
I should have just stayed out of the thread like I had been doing as long as this thread has existed. With that said, it certainly wouldn't be crazy for me to make posts to stir the pot in a heated debate. :nana:
Let's just say I have an agenda. That I get a kick out of the fact that some of you guys absolutely hate the idea that MMA as we know it today has been, to some extent, influenced by Japanese pro wrestling. It still doesn't make anything I've said incorrect, does it?
What info did you want me to post? You know the info you posted wasnt factual right? The info about Inoki hosting MMA events in the 70s? Just go on Inoki's own wikipedia page and they tell you those matches are scripted.
I have nothing to gain by "winning" this debate, trust me. Just having some fun, and there is some actually some good information posted in here.
I'm well aware of that. But those scripted matches were a part of the evolution from pro wrestling to mixed martial arts in Japan.
I am sure his agenda is to equate the UFC to merely the same thing as the WWE. I just don't really see anything wrong with saying MMA today has roots from the old Japanes Pro Wrestling or Shoot wrestling as some might say. It has nothing to do with Vince McMahon and Stone Cold Steve Austin.
Wrestling has always been huge in Japan, nobody thought that people would actually pay to see real matches, as scripted matches could be made as entertaining as they wanted them to be. Inoki among others pretty much bridged the gap between the fake and the real.
Right. That's my understanding too. Godfather says that isn't true though, so I was hoping he could post some information that can show me the light.
6 years ago, i would say no. But in the past few years, Andrew has tranformed himself and attitude and i can say that yes he thinks we are that stupid.
I have a problem with saying it has roots in the wrestling, but i dont have problem saying there are roots in the wrestlers.
More pro wrestling. Again, Inoki wasnt a pioneer for MMA in Japan. It was around decades before him. So how can he be the root if this shit was going on in the 20s?
I don't think you're stupid. I'm not sure about Trplsec... but you aren't stupid. Your problem is your refusal to see the other side of the story. In your ten years of posting, I don't think I've ever seen you change your stance on a big picture issue, no matter how big the mountain of evidence is on the other side. You're stubborn.
http://www.fightbeat.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1026524&postcount=21 when there is evidence, i admit when im wrong. But when people twist, turn, spin and swirl around an issue, then finally come to an angle that works for them, i wont ever conceed that. Again, your last twist and turn was Ken Shamrock. I just think its funny. Modern UFC is has roots in Japanese Pro wrestling, because Ken Shamrock was a pro-wrestler. Despite the fact that MMA was around 40 years before Shamrock was even born.
So shoot wrestling wasn't a part of the evolution between pro wrestling and MMA in Japan? Did the popularity of those shoot fighting matches in the 70s not lead to the eventual creation of Shooto?
The disconnect is, once again, your refusal to understand what influence means. You don't know what the word means. I don't know how I can make it any more clear.