An offensive minded Wlad versus the still capable Tyson. Who takes this ? I say Tyson K0 1 (Wlad's defense was his offense back then so that would spell trouble)
at that point in time, Tyson still had enough to win... basically because Wlad's chin sucks and he hadn't yet learned to fight like a woman in order to protect it Vitali would have taken the early leather and eventually wore Tyson out
TBH, If Im betting I probably bet on Wlad.....in 2000 itself I think tyson would have won, but Wlad was a bit better by 2002. It's a 50/50 fight, I'd just stick my money on the fight not going the distance and the winnings from that on whoever the underdog was, presumably Wlad. Or bet on Tyson to win in the first 3, straddled with Wlad just to win. Basically it comes down to whether Wlad can survive the first 3, the fights as simple as that.