2000 Tyson (Golota fight) vs 2002 Wlad (Mercer fight)

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by BOSS, Mar 30, 2011.

  1. BOSS

    BOSS TBD

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2010
    Messages:
    20,447
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    Gender:
    Female
    An offensive minded Wlad versus the still capable Tyson. Who takes this ?
    I say Tyson K0 1 (Wlad's defense was his offense back then so that would spell trouble)
     
  2. Jimmy

    Jimmy The Greatest of Are Times

    Joined:
    May 2, 2009
    Messages:
    28,077
    Likes Received:
    742
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    Tyson inside 4 rounds.
     
  3. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,297
    Likes Received:
    6,194
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    Wlad would have shat his trunks
     
  4. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2002
    Messages:
    30,692
    Likes Received:
    4
    Tyson at that point.
     
  5. Irish

    Irish Yuge, Beautiful

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    111,129
    Likes Received:
    8,389
    Location:
    In The Trenches With My Boy Sepp
    Home Page:
  6. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2002
    Messages:
    30,692
    Likes Received:
    4
    What?
     
  7. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    90,394
    Likes Received:
    4,377
    Occupation:
    SUCK MY BALLS!!
    Location:
    Beyond The Pale
    at that point in time, Tyson still had enough to win... basically because Wlad's chin sucks and he hadn't yet learned to fight like a woman in order to protect it

    Vitali would have taken the early leather and eventually wore Tyson out
     
  8. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,297
    Likes Received:
    6,194
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    TBH, If Im betting I probably bet on Wlad.....in 2000 itself I think tyson would have won, but Wlad was a bit better by 2002.

    It's a 50/50 fight, I'd just stick my money on the fight not going the distance and the winnings from that on whoever the underdog was, presumably Wlad.

    Or bet on Tyson to win in the first 3, straddled with Wlad just to win.

    Basically it comes down to whether Wlad can survive the first 3, the fights as simple as that.
     

Share This Page