In these fights, where was there the biggest size difference, and the least? Floyd Mayweather-Oscar De La Hoya Bernard Hopkins-Oscar De La Hoya Floyd Mayweather-Juan Manuel Marquez Manny Pacquiao-Miguel Cotto
From greatest to least: Floyd Mayweather-Juan Manuel Marquez - So much that nobody (aside from the most delusional Floyd haters) gave Marquez - a legit Top 3 P4P entrant at the time - a shot in hell at even winning a couple of rounds against a 20-month inactive Floyd. Bernard Hopkins-Oscar De La Hoya - Fairly safe to say that Hopkins does the same to Oscar even without the prearranged conclusion. Oscar didn't look like a MW against Sturm, and even less so against one of the best MW's or all time. Floyd Mayweather-Oscar De La Hoya - Despite what should've been a clear and decisive win, Floyd was clearly weary of the incoming against a faded DLH, making the fight a lot closer than should've been the case. Manny Pacquiao-Miguel Cotto - Smaller man has his way with bigger man. What more can be said.
Hopkins dwarfs most Light-heavyweights,... Hopkins - De La Hoya easily,.. what a disgusting fight,..and it was a fixed fight at that. Awesome 'old-school' mafia-style stuff though.
Biggest, probably Oscar against Nard. Oscar isn't even a huge welterweight to be honest. A good sized welter, but not exactly a Hearns or Williams. Tito looked bigger than him. Nard is a BIG middleweight, the size difference was very obvious. After that I'd have to say Floyd against Marquez. He looked 2 divisions bigger, which he was. Then Manny against Cotto. Cotto looked a division bigger, but no more. Cotto has always looked like a pretty small welterweight to me. Then at only slightly less than Manny against Cotto, Floyd against Oscar. Basically looked like a small welterweight against a big welterweight.
