Which was more brilliant?

Discussion in 'General Boxing Discussion' started by Xplosive, Aug 27, 2011.

  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Benitez-Duran, or Kalambay-McCallum 1?

    IMO, these are the two most beautiful boxing exhibitions over the distance. Both El Radar, and Kalambay put on absolutely FLAWLESS performances.... which was better?

    I was thinking of adding McGirt-Brown to the discussion, since thats also a flawless boxing clinic, but its not AS impressive considering that Simon Brown isnt in the same class as Duran, and McCallum.
     
  2. Irish

    Irish Yuge, Beautiful

    I haven't seen either, so I couldn't possibly comment.
     
  3. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Benitez beat Duran more comprehensively, to me, than Kalambay beat McCallum
     
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    You're missing out. I would imagine that both are on youtube. Trust me, both are worth viewing multiple times. Two beautiful virtuoso boxing displays. I'd say Benitez's performance was slightly more electrifying though. Duran(despite what his groupies might say) was in shape, and "up" for the fight.... but he simply had NO answers at all for Will.
     
  5. Irish

    Irish Yuge, Beautiful

    Wilfredo is definitely a guy I need to check out more. I've only seen his fight with Ray Leonard, which, I feel, was stopped early. Apart from that, not much. Too bad what happened to him in the end. Arum was indeed a worm. Anyfight where Duran loses or where the "Valero" is brought out of him is worth watching.
     
  6. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    benitez best performance to watch, I think, is the Palomino fight
     
  7. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Disagree big time! The Duran fight was Benitez at his TRUE best. He beat Duran alot more clearly than he did Palomino, and it goes without saying that Duran was better than Palomino.

    The Palomino fight IMO his 3rd best performance. The Cervantes fight was his 2nd best performance.
     
  8. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    the Cervantes fight was close

    the Palomino fight wasn't

    Duran at 154 is a sometimes good fighter, it's less impressive to me... if you make that fight in 1979, Benitez is not winning
     
  9. Trplsec

    Trplsec Sleeps in a Cage

    Benitez over Duran was more impressive to me. The Duran, at 154, who fought Benetiz was the soft, flabby, almost disinterested version. It was impressive that Benitez was able to beat a guy that normal ate counter punchers for lunch with his swarming style and amazingly underrated footwork. But I was disgusted by the Duran that fought Wilfred.

    But on the other hand, Kalambay benefited from home town judging in a fight I thought McCallum narrowly but clearly deserved to win. Who's ever heard of 4 or 5 rounds scored EVEN in a title fight?

    And this isn't up for debate. :)


    On the other hand, Kalambay was able to out
     
  10. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Benitez's win is always wrongly sullied by the usual Duran excuses.
     
  11. REEDsART

    REEDsART MATCHMAKER

    BALDERDASH!!!...

    When Roberto Duran was 'Right', he was Impossible to Defeat, IMPOSSIBLE!!!...The Mere Fact that Benitez BEAT him is MORE than Enough Reason to SULLY that Win...



    REED:egypt:
     
  12. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Certainly a subject we see eye-to-eye on, Mr. REED.
     
  13. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    I'm not taking anything away from it, I just don't think that Roberto Duran by that stage of his career was anywhere near the fighter he was even three years earlier

    Make it 1977 at 140 or 1979 at 147 and I think Duran definitely comes out on top either way
     
  14. loadedgloves

    loadedgloves "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    +1
     
  15. REEDsART

    REEDsART MATCHMAKER

    So What U're Saying is, Esteban DeJesus was BETTER than Wilfred Benitez, Since he Managed to CONVINCINGLY Beat Duran Around that Same Timeframe, CLOSER to Duran's BEST Weight???...



    REED:dunno:
     
  16. REEDsART

    REEDsART MATCHMAKER

    CONVENIENT, BUILT-IN Excuse for the DECISIVE Loss to DeJesus Coming in 5.......4.......3.....2.....



    REED:shit:
     
  17. Haymaker

    Haymaker WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    No, because that was a glitch in Duran's 1972 run. It was clearly NOT the best Duran.
     
  18. REEDsART

    REEDsART MATCHMAKER

    Does ANY Fighter Get the BENEFIT of "Glitches", "Lack of Focus", "Lack of Motivation" or Being "Out of Shape" MORE than Duran Does???...There's a Segment of Posters who Conjure Up EXCUSES for Every One of his Losses...



    REED:shit:
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2011
  19. mikE

    mikE "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    :popcorn:
     
  20. Ugotabe Kidding

    Ugotabe Kidding WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    I also heard that Duran had pubic louses at the fight time, so obviously this loss don't count
     
  21. Hex-One

    Hex-One "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    ahhhhh Wilfred El Radar Benitez! Such a great fighter that never fought to his full potential.
     
  22. loadedgloves

    loadedgloves "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    It's not an excuse, it is his own fault. But it's well-documented that Ray Arcel yelled at Duran in the dressing room while Duran was in tears, telling him "you lost that fight in the gym!" Duran proved that to be true and that he was fully capable of beating DeJesus when they rematched.

    And yes, DeJesus was an excellent lightweight.
     
  23. REEDsART

    REEDsART MATCHMAKER

    What's FUNNY about All of this is that it was Usually Duran Fans that CHASTISED REED for "Idol Worshipping" Roy Jones Back in the Day, yet Ya'll Do the Same Shit EVERY BIT as MUCH, if Not More...When the Topic was Roy, Guys Said "NO Fighter is Invincible, ANYBODY Can B Beaten, There's ALWAYS a Guy that Has your #, etc."....

    MANY of those Same Posters R VEHEMENT Supporters of Roberto Duran & they Do the Same Shit U're Doing Here...IDOL WORSHIPPING him...

    So NO Fighter (Except for Duran) is Invincible???...ANYBODY (Except for Duran) Can B Beaten????...Duran Basically MADE HIMSELF Lose the Fights he Did???...There's ALWAYS a Guy that Has your # (Except for Duran)???...

    Sorry, but there's Absolutely NATHAN that Suggests Duran would've EVER Beaten Wilfred Benitez OR Tommy Hearns...He was Beaten Sooooo THOROUGHLY that it was MORE than "Motivation", "Focus", "Not Being Right" (or Whatever Other CRUTCH U Choose to Use) that Lead to him LOSING...

    Dude was a Great, GREAT Fighter...Top 3-5 All Time EASILY...But he WASN'T this Impervious Fighting Machine that YOU & Many Others Make him Out to B....



    REED:dancingBaby:
     
  24. winner by choke

    winner by choke Undisputed Champion

    DeJesus did very well in both rematches...even though he was beaten brutally he held his own.

    And he had real excuses in those fights (strung-out) unlike durans excuse (blew up between fights)
     
  25. loadedgloves

    loadedgloves "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    The Duran from Duran-Leonard 1 would've beaten Benitez.

    I agree Duran never beats Hearns. But there's really no shame in that.
     
  26. Irish

    Irish Yuge, Beautiful

    I don't know what the beef here is.

    Duran is a legend. He is also one of the very very very few lightweights who have both dominated their own division and offered something significant outside of it.
     
  27. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Dejesus got one out of three off Duran

    Benitez arguably lost to Bruce curry and Harold Weston, if you want to get into semantics
     
  28. Erratic

    Erratic "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Duran was on an island for convicts when he trained for Benitez.

    He was in good shape.
     
  29. loadedgloves

    loadedgloves "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Let's also not forget that 154 was hardly Duran's best weight.
     
  30. Haymaker

    Haymaker WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    It was bad oysters man. He had to take a dump. The foot blisters. You know.
     

Share This Page