Ricky Hatton deserves the utmost respect.....

Discussion in 'General Boxing Discussion' started by Jimmy, Sep 27, 2011.

  1. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,276
    Likes Received:
    6,190
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    I see no reason to think Calzaghe was clearly better. If he'd ever fought anyone as good as Pac or Mayweather he would have been mangled.
     
  2. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    25,584
    Likes Received:
    3,827
    Location:
    West London
    He was far more adaptable than Ricky, and nobody would "mangle" Calzaghe
     
  3. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    90,394
    Likes Received:
    4,377
    Occupation:
    SUCK MY BALLS!!
    Location:
    Beyond The Pale
    Calzaghe was a slapping aerobics instructor masquerading as a prizefighter


    fuck him
     
  4. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    25,584
    Likes Received:
    3,827
    Location:
    West London
    Let it go cdogg, let it go.
     
  5. Jimmy

    Jimmy The Greatest of Are Times

    Joined:
    May 2, 2009
    Messages:
    28,077
    Likes Received:
    742
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    Calzaghe was no slapper
     
  6. Jimmy

    Jimmy The Greatest of Are Times

    Joined:
    May 2, 2009
    Messages:
    28,077
    Likes Received:
    742
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    Hatton beats Khan at 140.
     
  7. Irish

    Irish Yuge, Beautiful

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    111,089
    Likes Received:
    8,387
    Location:
    In The Trenches With My Boy Sepp
    Home Page:
    Absolutely. Foot-Speed and the fact that Khan can't take it downstairs would be the deciding factor. That and the fact that Amir really isn't all that good to begin with.

    As for this Calzaghe debate, I do think Joe had a few more strings to his bow.
     
  8. Destruction and Mayhem

    Destruction and Mayhem PHASE ----3

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    45,325
    Likes Received:
    1,079
    Location:
    Earth
    Are some people on this thread seriously suggesting that Hatton was a better fighter than Calzaghe? :scratcher:
     
  9. Jimmy

    Jimmy The Greatest of Are Times

    Joined:
    May 2, 2009
    Messages:
    28,077
    Likes Received:
    742
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    No
     
  10. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,869
    Likes Received:
    1,877
    I liked Hatton for recognizing that he was protected and not properly challenged fighting in U.K., and his subsequent decision to fight in the U.S. And he was smart in the sense he presumably made a ton of money in England, and then fought the best in the U.S. He could've easily ducked stiff competition in the U.S. and a lot of people would think he was a better fight than he was as a result, and give him credit for beating guys he didn't even face. But that's not what Hatton wanted.
     
  11. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,276
    Likes Received:
    6,190
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    Tim Bradley is far more 'adaptable' than Julio Cesar Chavez. And he's UNBEATEN!
     
  12. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,276
    Likes Received:
    6,190
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    I'd say they're on about the same level, actually, as the results in their career illustrate.
     
  13. Destruction and Mayhem

    Destruction and Mayhem PHASE ----3

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    45,325
    Likes Received:
    1,079
    Location:
    Earth
    Calzaghe was clearly a better fighter than hatton. Hatton beat Tszyu and Castillo..very good victories, no doubt..but Hatton could have never utterly dominated guys like Lacy and Kessler the way Cazaghe did.
     
  14. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,276
    Likes Received:
    6,190
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    'Adaptability' and 'bow strings', do not a better fighter make - it's just an attribute like any other. The results against comparable fighters & their manner are the 'pudding' here and the demonstrative proof that Calzaghe was not a higher level fighter to Hatton at-fucking-all. Just go through the Ws & Ls, the rounds won and lost, the calibre of fighter they come against.

    People think they're too smart to be influenced by seeing a guy retire unbeaten vs the impact of seeing a guy KTFO (against the best of the best), but these factors settle as the DEFINING IMAGES of a guy's career. Calzaghe won his 'big nights' and gets filed away as a 'winner', Hatton ends up on his back on his biggest nights and that's what flashes up like a spliced cinema frame when his name comes up.

    Emotion trumps cold analysis, and in the end CYNICAL HUSTLING trumps genuine competitive spirit and ambition.
     
  15. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,276
    Likes Received:
    6,190
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    Frankly Lacy is no better than Mallinagi, Urango, Tackie, etc. All of whom Hatton completely dominated. Lacy was a nothing.

    Calzaghe didn't dominate Kessler. It was even after 9.
     
  16. Jimmy

    Jimmy The Greatest of Are Times

    Joined:
    May 2, 2009
    Messages:
    28,077
    Likes Received:
    742
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    Lacy = Garbage
     
  17. Destruction and Mayhem

    Destruction and Mayhem PHASE ----3

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    45,325
    Likes Received:
    1,079
    Location:
    Earth
    fair enough.
     
  18. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,276
    Likes Received:
    6,190
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    Brilliant, then we're all agreed, at last! Phew! :mj:

    All together now! - ♫♪♫ Calzaghe is a wanker ♫♪♫ Calzaghe is a wanker ♫♪♫ Nananana! Nananana! ♫♪♫ Calzaghe is a wanker ♫♪♫ Calzaghe is a wanker ♫♪♫ Nananana! Nananana! ♫♪♫

    Feebes, you too - join the conga line! :egypt:
     
  19. Destruction and Mayhem

    Destruction and Mayhem PHASE ----3

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    45,325
    Likes Received:
    1,079
    Location:
    Earth
    Your rebuttal was good and so I give it props. However anyone with eyes to see can clearly tell that Calzaghe was a better fighter than Hatton and quite frankly, Hatton doesn't beat the version of Hopkins that Calzaghe beat, p4p.
     
  20. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,276
    Likes Received:
    6,190
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    I don't see any reason why not. In fact Hatton would be well suited to do just what Calzaghe & Taylor did - out hustle him, outmuscle him, out work him, outspeed him with quick feet etc. Wright, Pavlik & Tarver were ALL low output guys who could be neutralised & let Hopkins do the only thing he could still do very well at his advanced age (and consequently inflate our perceptions of just how good he still was).

    A career lightweight as old as Hopkins with Hopkins abilities (aka stamina problems) vs Hatton? I could certainly imagine Ricky out hustling a close, unimpressive decision there.
     
  21. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    25,584
    Likes Received:
    3,827
    Location:
    West London
    Even after 9 :lol:

    Sorry Hut I could agree with POSSIBLY even after 6, but after that it was ALL Joe.

    He was clearly better that Hatton, in a p4p match Joe wins comfortably
     
  22. Jimmy

    Jimmy The Greatest of Are Times

    Joined:
    May 2, 2009
    Messages:
    28,077
    Likes Received:
    742
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    In a p4p match Calzaghe is ALOT better than Hatton.
     
  23. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,276
    Likes Received:
    6,190
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    Based on what? Your 'eyes', I bet.
     
  24. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    25,584
    Likes Received:
    3,827
    Location:
    West London
    My eyes are all I need. It's just obvious he was more versatile that Hatton. I wouldn't pick Hatton to beat the version of Hopkins Joe beat in a p4p match either
     
  25. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,276
    Likes Received:
    6,190
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    Calzaghe-Kessler was 8-4 on all the cards as I recall, and I remember Kessler fading like a back to the future photograph through the last 4. So excuse my mistake, it was even after 8, not 9, with one round in it after 9.
     
  26. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,276
    Likes Received:
    6,190
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    It's 'obvious' that Chavez isn't as 'versatile' as Tim Bradley. My 'eyes' are all I need to tell me that.:limp:
     
  27. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,276
    Likes Received:
    6,190
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    Actual results & the context they create >>>>>>>>>>> 'my eyes'.
     
  28. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    25,584
    Likes Received:
    3,827
    Location:
    West London
    Disagree. Lewis should have wiped out Vitali if it was just based on competition faced, my eyes told me it was a tough fight for Lewis, and I were right
     
  29. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    72,276
    Likes Received:
    6,190
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    Nah. Vitali's won just about every round of every fight he's been in other than against Lewis. 'Results'.
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2011
  30. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    25,584
    Likes Received:
    3,827
    Location:
    West London
    As has Calzaghe :dunno:, he's had two competitive fights his whole career, one of which is blown way out of proportion
     

Share This Page