Grab,...... implies he clutched, gripped or squeezed Hopkins leg. Given the speed of the sequence, with Hopkins applying pressure on his back, he could have been reaching for something to stabilise his balance under the weight and momentum of Hopkins charge and even so, he still didn't 'grab hold' of the leg. :nono:
I ask myself....what would Bernard do? Foul like hell is the answer. I hope Chad is curled up in bed with his title belt right now. 1, 2, Schaefers Coming for You, 3, 4 better lock your door
That was fucken awesome,.. :: ... "I ask myself...what would Bernard do?".. :: ,.. Classic, given the media sentiment,.. it was the perfect lead right pot-shot.
Quillerman should have asked him. Should have asked him that if Bernard had done the Coal-Bag to Dawson, who would have gotten what? And Bernard would be standing there talking bout TKO's and no-fouls and 60/40 turtle raising. He'd forget he'd lost the fight. He'd forget, and he'd stand there burying himself. Quillerman should have let him speak, let the sewage rush forth, let the clown babble on about ",my mass" and " my faster". Who I am? Who I am? I am the loser, thats who the fuck I am. Sociopath. All work and no play makes Bernard a dull boy. Chad ain't no Urban Guru.
It was the perfect piece,.. the conservative american media have portrayed Hopkins as a prophet for years and years,..and given the context of this discussion,..the oppurtunity of "I ask myself,....... what would Bernard do?".. ^ Implodes the entire gyroscope,.. Masterful stuff, Irishman,..
What in the hell are you talking about? The conservative American media? What is that? Everyone knows American media, save for Fox News, which isn't discussing Bernard Hopkins, is liberal as hell. 94% of Washington Press vote Democrat! Did you know that? I have to wonder whether you know what the fuck conservative means.
It wasn't until cdogg responded that I knew what you meant. So you're saying the media isn't left-winged?
only in the name of the wealthy left-wing, not the real people the left wing is supposed to protect are you saying FoxNews isn't offensive to anyone with a brain and a shred of objectivity?
god dammit cdogg is right, this totally violates my recent stance. Democrats aren't necessarily liberal, especially southern and old timer democrats. Fox News is something out of fairy tale land. People taking that seriously is frightening.
I'm not a stupid person, by any means. Not claiming to be a genius, but I am no dummy either. If you took the time to simply find that out and be reasonable, you would likely find plenty of common ground with me.
Well to be fair Double L,.. most media elements from a particular country covering a global sport are rather indulged in tribalism,.. it probably wouldn't have offended you to hear me and Irish bash the Australian, and British media for the way they've come to the aid of flag-waving charlatans ambitious of a cash snatch on the back of a patriotic supremecy ticket. America has the most sites covering boxing and therefore the most editorialists,..but they're NOT the worst offenders. P4P the British media are far, far more 'aggressive' and it can be reflected by the ROARING hysterical dregs on display who follow British fighters overseas, ...here lies a great reflection of the editorialist's poisonous influence.
Why are you seeking to have "plenty of common ground" with Jaws? Surely that's a step in the wrong direction
To put an end to the endless hit-and-run little jibes (much of which are blatant misrepresentations of who I am and what I think) ... The guy hates me based off of misconceptions
Fox News is no more biased than MSNBC or CNN. But unlike CNN and MSNBC, Fox doesn't pretend to be objective. That's a huge difference.
:giggle: the left-wing protects? that's about the funniest thing I've ever heard. How exactly, pray-tell, does the left-wing protect anyone? Who are these "real people," you're referring to, and how does the left-wing protect them exactly?
