Juan Manuel Marquez vs. Chavez at 130

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by BoxFan, Nov 14, 2011.

  1. BoxFan

    BoxFan WBC Champion

    Who do you got?
     
  2. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    I have Chavez, narrowly, in a sensation of a fight. It would be close, alright. I lean to Chavez.
     
  3. mexican wedding shirt

    mexican wedding shirt The Greatest of Are Times

    Marquez clear decision. He'd get roughed him a few rounds, but ultimately he'd pick Chavez apart.
     
  4. jaws1216

    jaws1216 "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    :lol:

    This thread is a joke right?
     
  5. BoxFan

    BoxFan WBC Champion

    Not one bit, JMM would give Chavez fits at 130.
    But...I pick Chavez to win a decision 7 rounds to 5 or 8 rounds to 4.
    But Chavez would take hard effective counters.
    Chavez was great but lets not pretend he was unbeatable...especially against against another all time great...
    I hate when people overrate fighters just because they feel no one right now can beat anyone in the 80's or 90's...horrible.
     
  6. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Chavez would win this cleanly... Marquez would be a bloody mess by the end... It's close for 6 rounds or so, but after that Chavez takes over

    Oh, and Marquez is not all-time great
     
  7. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Disagreed on both counts. Personally.

    Chavez would NOT dominate half the fight with Marquez at 130.
     
  8. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    I have no doubt he would

    Marquez is a guy who gets hurt, gets banged up... Chavez is the hurt machine... You need big-time speed to get off and get out against Chavez... Marquez doesn't have that... Scrub brawlers like Diaz and Katsidis have had their moments pushing Marquez around... take those guys and multiply their skills, talent and toughness times 1000 and you have Chavez... he would work Marquez over in the later rounds
     
  9. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    I really don't know. Maybe slightly leaning towards Chavez but it will be tight
     
  10. whiskey

    whiskey Czarcasm

    If this was the older and slower on his feet Chavez from the end of his career you could make a case for Marquez.

    However the version @ 130 is too much for JMM.
     
  11. Jake

    Jake WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    As much as I like Marquez and hated Chavez... this is no contest. Prime Chavez is a bear for any fighter in history in or around that weight class.
     
  12. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    No contest is absurd. Marquez is a live underdog.

    Its Chavez...not Duran.
     
  13. BoxFan

    BoxFan WBC Champion

    Cdogg you are my boy, and I respect your opinon on the fight, but to say Marquez isn't an all-time great is just wrong. I know you aren't high on him but respect is due.
     
  14. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    marquez was old as fuck when he fought those guys. you want pit a peak chavez against marquez on the downside of his careeR?

    how would chavez from the ken sigurani fight do against a prime marquez?
     
  15. Wrong on both counts. You don't understand the sport dude. You know the history and have seen more fights than anyone not named Broadwayjoe...but you just don't get it.

    Chavez-Marquez at 130 is a COMPETITIVE fight all the way to the final bell. Chavez wins a close decision for consistent workrate.

    Marquez IS an all time great. The little mexican beat Barrera, drew with and arguably beat Pacquiao twice, stopped Casamayor, Katsidis, Gainer, medina and Diaz.

    All time great.
     
  16. I was with you until the last statement..

    Duran wasn't significantly better than Chavez as you imply.
     
  17. Ugotabe Kidding

    Ugotabe Kidding WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    I'd lean towards Chavez but JMM does give him a helluva fight. Taylor landed shitload against Chavez (at higher weight of course) and Marquez even though he wasn't as quick has incredible accuracy and combinations and he would bust Chavez' face up some. Chavez does overcome him eventually but nothing suggests that it would be a one-sided let alone an easy fight
     
  18. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Sly - 'Chavez vs Ray Leonard is a pick 'em'.:l3:
     
  19. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    I don't see how anyone could act like this is anything but a closely contested battle.
     
  20. Hut...you're regressing.

    Even IF I was saying that Duran and Chavez were on exactly the same level it wouldn't necesarrily translate into Leonard-Chavez is a pick'em.
     
  21. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    :lol:

    Yes it would. You also think Chavez would have been even on the cards with Hagler going into the 15th don't you. DON'T YOU!?
     
  22. :lol:

    Forget Chavez, you think Floyd would have been DOMINATED and blown away in two rounds by Hearns?
     
  23. Ugotabe Kidding

    Ugotabe Kidding WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    If Leonard chooses to goe toe-to-toe against Chavez and if Hagler carries him, I don't see why not:mj:

    (You asked for my output :kick:)
     
  24. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    All the productive output of Fannie & Mae:bears:
     
  25. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    No. Floyd rules.
     
  26. word.
     
  27. puerto rock

    puerto rock WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    :atu:
     
  28. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    154lb Hearns vs Floyd would compound the rules of entropy, ya dig
     
  29. 154lbs or not...Floyd aint getting dominated and stopped in two rounds with his ability, ya dig?
     
  30. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    He ain't beating a welterweight Ray leonard in 10 tries with his ability either. Or Hearns in 50.
     

Share This Page