Hagler vs Pac @ 160

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by broadwayjoe, Nov 17, 2011.

  1. broadwayjoe

    broadwayjoe Undisputed Champion

    Just saw mikE claim that Pac would have a chance against Hagler. Does anyone agree with this?? :lol:
     
  2. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Manny wouldnt see round 3.
     
  3. whiskey

    whiskey Czarcasm

    So he couldn't manage better than Roy Bum Senior or others?

    Cmon.

    Obviously Hagler is too big and too good at middle but Manny has the speed, footwork and skill to not be made into roadkill within minutes. It's Hagler, not Tyson at heavyweight.
     
  4. Dog Jones

    Dog Jones WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Pacquiao would UD the Hagler making his pro debut
     
  5. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    Agreed
     
  6. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    But guys, Joppy beat Duran.
     
  7. broadwayjoe

    broadwayjoe Undisputed Champion

    C'mon Whiskey....this is like a Stafford response. You are better than that.

    Hagler also disposed of good middleweights in the early rounds of fights as well. Hagler was more of a boxer than brawler, but when properly motivated, he could make his opposition wish they had chosen another line of work. Sorry, but Hagler would destroy Pac. It might not be a first round stoppage, but Manny is in way over his head here.
     
  8. broadwayjoe

    broadwayjoe Undisputed Champion

    And he also might steal a decision right now.
     
  9. Ugotabe Kidding

    Ugotabe Kidding WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Hagler in about 8th after a rather one-sided fight, but considering that Hagler was not a murderous puncher, he usually didn't go aggressively after his opponents, Pac has great stamina and seemingly a very solid chin and his movement is excellent, Hagler does not trash him in three rounds, no way.
     
  10. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Agree with Ugo. Hagler between 8-11, in a one sided affair. Roach might well be the one to end it.
     
  11. Queer
     
  12. Hagler too big, but not too powerful or too tall. He stops Pac late and his own southpawedness messes up Pac's rhythm as well.
     
  13. broadwayjoe

    broadwayjoe Undisputed Champion

    Of course. And the agenda continues... :lol:
     
  14. Queer
     
  15. broadwayjoe

    broadwayjoe Undisputed Champion

    Sticks and stones might break my bones, but they will not forward your agendas.
     
  16. Queer
     
  17. puerto rock

    puerto rock WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Hagler too big and too strong.

    Manny would make it fun but he woulnd't last long in doing so.

    Hagler TKO 5
     
  18. Pac's more durable that John "The Beast" Mugabi IMO.
     
  19. puerto rock

    puerto rock WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    ^^^^I'm just not sure how he takes a big strong middleweight's punch.

    If he lasts longer, it would definitely be worse for him.
     
  20. broadwayjoe

    broadwayjoe Undisputed Champion

    Yep. And even when he did land...he's not going to come close to denting Hagler's chin.
     
  21. Hagler is too much for Pac at 160lbs when you consider styles and sizes. Too much. Probably mid rounds TKO the more I think about it.

    P4P...probably a different story entirely.
     
  22. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Pacquiao's clearly the greater fighter, but it would count for nought here.

    Hagler in seven.
     
  23. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Hagler pretty fucking easily... I don't think it takes 8 rounds either, frankly
     
  24. loadedgloves

    loadedgloves "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Did I step into the twilight zone? Pac is better/greater than Hagler? More durable than Mugabi? The Mugabi fight being referenced in the first place (Hagler was past his prime then)?

    Have you motherfuckers seen a PRIME Marvin Hagler fight?!
     
  25. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Pacquiao is greater historically.

    Frankly, I dont even see it as a debate at this point.
     
  26. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    :pointlaugh:
     
  27. broadwayjoe

    broadwayjoe Undisputed Champion

    Maybe the washed-up version that fought Norris, but not the one from before and up until the Hagler fight.
     
  28. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    I certainly do.
     
  29. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Hagler was a better middleweight than Pac was at any weight. To me that matters at least as much (more) than having a body and style that allows freakish weight hopping.
     
  30. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Hell, Pacquiao can go stride for stride with Ali nowadays. Hagler isnt an historical hurdle.

    I tend to side with division dominance over the multi-belt, multi-weight approach of the modern fighter too, but when a guy proves himself a world-class operator between 126 & 154, beating the kind of opposition Pacquiao has, hes irresistable.

    Hardly matters here, mind. Hagler would surely knock his man out.
     

Share This Page