Fighting attributes (should be a fun exercize)

"Very beatable"??

from 1967 until the second leonard fight, Duran lost ONE FIGHT (avenged twice, emphatically) and won 71... he was Lightweight champion for 6 years, making 12 defenses (11 by KO) ... How is that a "very beatable" fighter?

 

Sorry...let me clarify. He was very beatable above Lightweight.

 

still nowhere near "very"

 

far more beatable than guys like you would want us to believe.

Duran vs Trinidad at 154lbs. What transpires?

 

Duran fucking clowns him just like every elite fighter Tito has ever faced, be serious please.

That's like asking "Who winz, Pacmanz or Rocky Juarez??".

 

agREED. All of this Duran hate is ridiculous.

 

agREED. Duran, while not at his best over 147, was still a legit and dangerous fighter and nowhere near the chump some would have us believe.

 

Jones,'very beatable after Ruiz'. Charles, 'very beatable' after Walcott III. Robinson, Louis & Ali, 'very beatable' after retirement. Foster,'very beatable' at heavyweight. Olivares, 'very beatable' after leaving bantamweight.

And few of them had to fight some of the best guys in their weights ever (Hearns, benitez, Hagler) after they had declined or left their natural division. If Leonard, Hearns, Benitez, Hagler had been between 147-160 today Floyd would never have dipped a toe in those divisions to become 'very beatable'.

 

Duran would turn him inside out. Tito's confusion would have it's own gravitational field.

 

agREED. There's no way Floyd makes that move with those fighters available.

 

I like Duran big there, actually

Duran on a good night at 154 against Trinidad?

maybe another guy... if you had said MIke McCallum or even a guy who can stick and move like Hoya, I'd be more inclined to agree

but Tito?

 

The Roldan Fight & Arguably the RE w/Leonard...



REED:Thumbs:

 

Like Joppy, Duran ALSO "Lost Because of the Ring"...Just Ask Brother HUT...



REED:Lok:

 

SO the overweight southern brother returns. What's new?

 

D&D major criticism of Duran is that he's not an urban flash-fighter. Plain and simple. Fighters who aren't urban flash by definition according to Sly are flawed.

 

Ha ha. Fantasy characters with magical ability.

 

The EQUINE ONE has Spoken...Have U Given Lennox Lewis his VOICE Back, Homey???...



REED:hammert:

 

Equine or not I'm 10 times better looking than you homey, even your wife would agree.

I'd charm her off you easily even with my Lennox Lewis voice. :hammert:

 

There AIN'T a Horse Faced Motherfucker on God's Green Earth that's Better Looking than REED, Homegirl...Your BUILD is Better, but You're Most Definitely NOT as Handsome as REED...Weight Can Be Gained OR Lost, but there's Absolutely NATHAN to B Done w/that GRILL of Yours, Seattle SLY...Pictures DON'T Lie...If Michael Johnson PROCREATED w/Mr. Ed, the Result Would B YOU...

It's Bad Enough you Met your Wife After Coming in Last @ the Kentucky Derby, but Ever Since Then, U WON'T Stop Talking about Floyd Mayweather, Simon Cowell & Michael ASSbender, in that EFFEMINATE Voice of yours...

Poor, POOR Woman...



REED:kidcool:

 

REED's vest > Sly's suit.

 

Seattle Sly,

 

:giggle:

nice.

 

:l1:

 

Sly's brand new but this is some funny patter ::

 

Reed did well there. I mean he knows that in terms of looks he's waaaay behind me but this rant actually had me believing for a second that he believed what he was saying. ::

REED's cool though...I mean him no harm. He just needs to lay off the McDonalds.

 

Since REED is 100% CONFIDENT in his HETEROsexuality, he's Able to Acknowledge a "Good" Looking Guy when he Sees 1...Having Said that, You're NOT a Handsome Dude, Brother Sly:nono:...You've Got a CHISELED Track Runner's Physique for CERTAIN, but from the Neck UP You're Basically IRRELEVANT...

Conversely, REED Could B 180lbs or 280lbs, yet STILL B a HANDSOME Motherfucker...It DOESN'T Really Matter...In his Adult Life, REED's Been as HEAVY as 230 & as LOW as about 160, MAINTAINING Pure, Unadulterated HANDSOMENESS in Both Instances...

You'd Beat REED in a BODYBUILDING Contest, but in Terms of LOOKS, You're TOAST, Homey...Or GLUE, as the Case may B....



REED:Lok:

 

::

ok brother REED.

I guarantee you that if we stand side by side and have 100 random strangers answer the simple question of who's better looking, facially, 99 would say me.

I say 99 and not 100, because here's always some fuckhead that prefers abstract art.

I admire your confidence, but it's not even close brother.

 

::

 

::

John Merrick would get laid with this attitude. The debate's moot