Mike McCallum vs Emile Griffith @ 160

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by broadwayjoe, Nov 18, 2011.

  1. broadwayjoe

    broadwayjoe Undisputed Champion

    Who wins?
     
  2. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    My initial response was Griffith on the simple basis of him being slightly the better man, but for whatever reason I feel like McCallum's style would give him some problems. An image of McCallum's rolling and countering working well as Griffith comes inside, flashes into my mind, and Im not sure where Griffith would win this from, given McCallum being so good on both the outside and inside. Certainly McCallum's slight achiles heel to movers isn't something Griffith would be able or inclined to take advantage of & a knock out is also against long odds.

    It'd be an incredible match up, no strong opinions on a winner. But McCallum.
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2011
  3. broadwayjoe

    broadwayjoe Undisputed Champion

    I bet it would be a bitch of a fight to judge.
     
  4. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Great fight... pick-em... A great technician in McCallum and a jack of all trades in Griffith... both exceptionally durable, both strong and dedicated fighters... Only thing I'm sure of is that I wish it could somehow be a reality
     
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    I swear, Griffith is somewhat overrated.

    McCallum to me was just overall the better fighter and technician.
     
  6. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    I disagree... Griffith was a lot more versatile and was in with a much higher level of comp throughout his career

    I think McCallum fought like "McCallum" better than Griffith could have... but in other aspects of the game, especially fighting on the backfoot, sticking and moving, Griffith was a lot better
     

Share This Page