Carl Froch vs. a prime Dariusz M.

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by Dog Jones, Jan 2, 2012.

  1. Dog Jones

    Dog Jones WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    X posted this on ESB and I'm curious to see what the consensus is on this match-up.
     
  2. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Darius all the way. Far superior technician
     
  3. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    Yep. Dariusz for me too.
     
  4. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    agree, DM can get there and stay there... I think he pushes Froch back consistently
     
  5. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    Dariusz is quite underrated to be honest. He was a damn good fighter.
     
  6. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Agreed. Better than certain Europeans of similar size I could name
     
  7. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    Yea he was definitely better than Ottke.
     
  8. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    -certain + all the
     
  9. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    You know that fight isn't a given for either guy. Great fight though.
     
  10. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    DM > Calzaghe
     
  11. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    I think DM would hammer Froch.
     
  12. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Still, Roy beats DM 12-0.
     
  13. Jesus of montreal

    Jesus of montreal WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    too bad he didn't had the balls to prove it
     
  14. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Same for DM. Still, Roy wins every round.
     
  15. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    No.
     
  16. Ugotabe Kidding

    Ugotabe Kidding WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Absolutely not
     
  17. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    More chance of Darius winning than Roy winning 12-0.....thats just not happening
     
  18. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    If they had fought in 97-98, when Roy was still at his best, then I cant see any other result besides DM getting pot shotted to death all night.

    DM was a very good fighter, but Roy was so special that he would make DM look 2nd/3rd rate.
     
  19. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Don't get me wrong, I'd pick Roy, but to say he'd win 12-0 is absurd. Darius would take rounds and he'd make Roy work hard.
     
  20. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    He'd only force Roy to open more. And forcing a prime Jones to open up more is not good....... for the opponent.

    DM was just too slow for Roy. And Jones DID hit hard enough to hurt DM. DM had a solid chin, but it wasnt granite.

    I'd give DM the edge over any 168-175 punder of today though. Even Ward.
     
  21. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Darius would apply more intelligent pressure than Roy has ever seen. Quite honestly i think it'd be a very hard fight for Roy.....watch the last 5 rounds of the Hopkins fight or what Griffin did against him. If you can press middle range against Roy and do so defensively responsibly Roy has allot of difficulties. That's where Darius lived. Roy isn't a superman, just a great fighter like other great fighters. I think he'd win, but it'd be as hard a fight as the first Griffin fight, maybe even harder.
     
  22. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    griffin and hopkins had defense
     
  23. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    You're right actually, I retract. Roy wold beat darius pretty easy.
     
  24. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    Dariusz wouldn't be a cakewalk for Roy
     
  25. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    I was overrating Dariusz for a moment there. It was a fun moment, while it lasted.
     
  26. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Calzaghe still stinks of sardines.
     
  27. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    :lol: It's all good. I'm glad you've seen the light.

    DM falls under a fairly simple formula against Jones... if he tries to win, he might win a couple rounds, but he would get stopped. If he doesn't try to win, he loses 12-0.
     
  28. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    OK, and you're still underrating him.
     
  29. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Well, as I said, he would win a couple rounds if he was there to win. I think that's fair.

    Roy was MUCH better.
     
  30. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    I can't say I see Roy/DM being much of a contest. I think you need a guy with a better long range game and better defense to beat Roy. I'd say Jones 9-3 is generous to DM
     

Share This Page