Cotto vs Hatton @ 140

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by Hut*Hut, Mar 14, 2012.

  1. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    The Hatton who beat Castillo vs the Cotto who beat Torres.

    I think Hatton outhustles him to a close decision.
     
  2. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Hard to say. Cotto was the better puncher and more stylish, but Hatton was tougher and is probably more willing to go that extra mile in a tough fight.

    Have to think about this one.
     
  3. Free Ike

    Free Ike WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    I'd favor Cotto. He is just better and has a better chin than the cHINA CHINNED Fatton.
     
  4. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Nah, not at 140 he didn't.
     
  5. loadedgloves

    loadedgloves "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Hatton stops him, Cotto was too fragile at 140.
     
  6. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    I'm not sure Cotto was a better boxer. He looked better but he lost allot of rounds at 140 and had some real scrapes. I fancy Hatton would be too strong at the weight.
     
  7. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    cotto by KO
     
  8. Anthony

    Anthony Admin Staff Member

    Cotto by KO. are you guys nuts?
     
  9. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    There's really nothing clear about it either way. Cotto didn't fight anyone close to Hatton's level at 140.
     
  10. mexican wedding shirt

    mexican wedding shirt The Greatest of Are Times

    I'd favour Cotto.

    I have a fairly high opinion of both fighters, and it would be a good fight, but I think Cotto is the better fighter.

    Good styles match up. Hatton doesn't like good counterpunchers, and Cotto doesn't like pressure.

    The thing is, Hatton is not big and strong enough to make Cotto wilt IMO, especially given that Cotto would be landing hard counters regularly.
     
  11. Anthony

    Anthony Admin Staff Member

    Hatton never fought anyone on Cotto's level at 140. Kostya was passed his prime and was a victim of holdgate all night.

    IMO when cotto was at 140, he was the true champ.
     
  12. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    He wasn't the true champ though. Tszyu was then Hatton.

    Tszyu was obviously much better than anyone Cotto beat at 140 - making Hatton more proven at the weight.

    I can see Cotto winning for sure but it's not some mismatch.
     
  13. mexican wedding shirt

    mexican wedding shirt The Greatest of Are Times

    As much as I despise Tszyu, yes he was better than anyone Cotto beat at 140.

    Excuses schmuses too, Hatton roughed him up, pressured the shit out of him and made him quit. Convincing win.
     
  14. Anthony

    Anthony Admin Staff Member

    Kostya was done after that fight. And he was being fouled all night. It was a disgusting fight. Lets not forget Hatton gets KOed in 2 by Pac at 140. in 2. :lol:
     
  15. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    It happens. Hatton's cojones were much bigger than Cotto's so when he got hurt against Pacquiao he didn't go into survival mode like Miguel.

    I do agree that Hatton got away with too much against Tszyu, but when it's all said and done it was still a quality win.
     
  16. ILLUMINATI

    ILLUMINATI Roberto Duran

    Cotto by KO...Hatton throws a lot of punches but he is not heavy handed or a one punch Ko fighter....

    I take Cotto's 2-3 straight and accurate counters to break down Hatton 4-5 looping and wild punches...
     
  17. Anthony

    Anthony Admin Staff Member

    What you call Cojones i call stupid wild slugging with no tecqnique against a strong accurate counterpuncher. Cotto, another strong counter puncher, would have a field say with Hatton.
     
  18. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    I can't see Cotto having a field day with anyone good, he never has had one

    Both of this guys would get shitkicked by about 10 different 140 pounders all-time
     
  19. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    By cojones I mean there has never been a moment in any fight where Ricky wasn't madly trying to win.
     
  20. Anthony

    Anthony Admin Staff Member

    Trying madly and losing stupidly.
     
  21. Anthony

    Anthony Admin Staff Member

    Trying stupidly is perfect for him
     
  22. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Losing is losing. Cotto lost too, he just stopped trying and started surviving.
     
  23. Anthony

    Anthony Admin Staff Member

    I never saw him as going into survival mode against pac. He was still fighting. and i disagree. Losing in two rounds to pac and your suppose be the 140 king and this guy is moving up in weight is worse. Did Hatton even land a punch?
     
  24. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    The result was worse, no doubt. Still doesn't tell me anything about a Hatton/Cotto fight years earlier.
     
  25. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Against the two best fighters of his generation. Against everyone else stupidly worked pretty good
     
  26. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    A weight drained Cotto <<<<<May & Pac
     
  27. Anthony

    Anthony Admin Staff Member

    I dont know about pretty well.
     
  28. Anthony

    Anthony Admin Staff Member

    No way cotto loses to hatton at any time in his career.
     
  29. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    45-0 outside those two fights and you could probably count the number of championship rounds he lost at 140 on two hands :dunno: pretty well, man
     
  30. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Based on what though? Cotto's division best win over Pauli Mallinagi? (Which Hatton reproduced much way dominantly)
     

Share This Page