Joe Frazier vs Wlad Klitschko

Who gets knocked TF out?

 

Frazier does. His left hook would never reach on Wlad's chin, his body work would not chop Wlad's roided up torso in time, and meanwhile Frazier would eat too many jabs and right crosses. Wlad stops him late

 

Frazier takes him out in three or four rounds.

 

Frazier UD 12

 

wald pussy would have a panic attack sometime before the 4th.

 

Wladimir will get KO'ed....5-8 rounds

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFDs5mT4JUs

:laughing:

 

Wladimir wasn't in his prime yet....

 

:l1::l1::l1::l1::l1:

wald pussy

yeah, clearly, there's no way Frazier could replicate the savage attack and pace of Lamon Brewster

 

Shhhh....this fight never happened....it never happened. No wait....Wlad was green, or poisoned, or....

 

Wlad by KO in let's say 5. Frazier would make Wlad fight and Wlad would be forced to open up in a sink or swim scenario. Bottom line Wlad lands big Frazier goes down the ref starts counting and Frazier is listening.

People picking Frazier are simply Wlad haters.

 

Wlad gets stretched in 4

 

artie:

 

wald pussy would have a meltdown.

 

Vaseline. :nono:

 

wald pussy::

 

I'd pay some serious coin to get Larry Merchant to call him wald pussy on the air during an anecdote

 

It never happened like Cassius Clay - Sonny Banks never happened. Surely Liston, Foreman or Shavers could replicate the savage attack and pace of Sonny Banks

 

Can we please not compare wald pussy to the greatest heavyweight ever?

 

The Frazier of the first Ali fight would be too much for Wlad.

 

Frazier wins. Far too good.

MTF

 

i'm not really sure how wald pussy would get past the first round here :scratcher:

 

This just in...Ali WON that fight with room to spare. Are you really trying to compare Ali-Banks to Brewster-Wlad. Really??

Swing and a miss for you. Thanks for playing.

 

Second the motion.

 

The point, which you surely understood, was that you can't pick a single fight to make a point, much less a fight that takes place years removed from fighter's prime. That is, if you want to be objective and shit

 

The point was not to compare the fighters but unfair criticism. But as an objective guy surely you understood that

 

Nope. You made a bad comparison. It doesn't make you a bad person, but you did it.

And there is nothing unfair with criticizing Wlad for his performance against Brewster. He was beaten down and stopped by an inferior opponent and demonstrated his flaws in the process. Hell..only someone who ISN'T objective would try to give Wlad a pass for his peformance in that fight. It was shitty.

On the other hand, Banks scored a flash knockdown, but otherwise got his butt kicked by Ali. So overly criticizing Ali for that IS unfair.

So you can be a snarky Wlad fan...or you can be objective...I guess both is out of the question for you.

 

Fuck the size difference.. Frazier chops him down, Wald Pussy does not see the distance.

 

Unless Frazier twists an ankle after slipping in the urine. Because we all know wald pussy would pee in his pants when Frazier started bringing it.

 

Ok, so if that was a bad comparison (or one you don't want to understand) then how about taking Frazier from the Jumbo Cummins fight and analyzing his chances here? It was a shitty performance, it was an inferior opponent, so giving him a pass for that is NOT objective?

The point was, the first Brewster fight happened when Wlad was not in his prime. And thus, even though we should not completely forget it, it shouldn't be the only evidence of judging this MM either, right? If we want to actually be objective that is