Not at all, but since you have perfect orthography all the time, from what I can see, I was just wondering why... Writing something different usually does happen for a reason. Not trying to be a grammar Nazi or something... was an honest question.
Reading this, from you, means that Kizer probably said something that is accurate, but above your head. Oh, the surprise... Nevada State Athletic Commission executive director Keith Kizer has defended the 114-114 scoring of Nevada judge C.J. Ross. “Just because a judge’s scorecard ends up even, doesn’t mean the judge necessarily thought the fight as a whole was even,” Kizer told USA Today. “It could be that a judge has six rounds for each fighter, but the six rounds she gave fighter A, she gave them to him easily and the six rounds she gave fighter B, they were really close rounds. That’s pretty much how it was last night…”I know most of the people won’t understand it, and I understand that.” Kizer also told USA Today that Ross is one of the NSAC’s top judges, and he’s not thinking about any disciplinary measure. Where Kizer is wrong is the part I bolded. Most people do understand it, it's just that the retards tend to make a scene. No offense. If you want to really go after Ross, pick 7 rounds that could absolutely not be scored for Floyd no matter where the judge was sitting. As I've said, I didn't score the fight live so I'm not going to argue that she was justified in her scoring, but I do know there were some close rounds and Alvarez hits harder than Floyd.
Are you trying to outdo your own stupidity? Only 1 or 2 fights where the fighters win the same number of rounds? This is off-the-charts stupid. No offense.
And is that for all forms of a majority decision or just a specific fighter or draw for each 21-1 bet?
Sure, but it wasn't apparent that's what he meant. It could have been "The fight ends in a majority decision" meaning either fighter or a draw. Regardless, guaranteeing a draw card if it goes to decision makes a majority decision a very likely outcome and would be an interesting way to fix a fight. However, I doubt a judge could get away with doing it often. There would be a money trail not too hard to follow. Not too much real money is ever put on 21-1 odds in a boxing match, I'm guessing.
Well according to ESPN, the blind bitch is stepping down: http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/i...her-canelo-alvarez-judge-stepping-report-says Of course if you actually read the article it sounds like the bitch is just taking some time off.
Pressure's Getting Tooooo HEAVY & There's Simply NO Explanation for Scoring Floyd-Canelo a Draw... You Hear that, mikE???...CONTRARIAN BULLSHIT, Scorecards & Overall Pugilistic DIPSHITTERY are Being Shown the Fucking Door...Do You "Understand" THAT???.... REED
