Who's better: Wlad or Floyd?

Floyd is a scared bitch.

 

obviously!

 

There is such a difference talent wise that I can't really come up with anything
Floyd is a master and Wlad is a big German robot

 

you think there is any correlation between wald pussy being euro and also fighting as though he possesses a vagina?

 

this was a serious argument that a guy named Dubblechin on maxboxing forums a few years back made.. that (for example) Tommy Morrison was a superior fighter to Ray Leonard, because he would've KO'd Leonard

 

he made that same argument here. henry akinwande would kick ricardo lopez's ass

 

yes, that was it. he was a real tool.

 

who's better? Joe Louis or Joe Hipp?

 

Joe Hipp. modern training techniques and better ginkgo baloba. Joe Louis was a caveman, Joe Hipp was a renaissance man.

Joe Louis threw a 1-2. Joe Hipp threw a 1-2-3-4 and had the obvious superior skill-set, and the wider hips........the better to pivot with.

Besides, I've seen Joe Hipp on ESPN Deportes. Joe Louis is just a fictional character whose film footage was concocted by the same folks who gave us the moon landing.

:bears:

 

Wlad is more difficult to beat and more difficult to last 12 rounds with.

Floyd is more difficult to knockout.

 

Well, knocking somebody out is beating them.

 

Which changes nothing.

 

Brewster, Corrie and some other bum beat him.....he can't be that hard to beat......

 

oK

 

The guys Floyd has been fighting have been way less pish.

 

So the Dude w/3 KO Losses is "MORE Difficult to Beat" than the UNDEFEATED Guy??...

Hmmmm???....



REED:scratcher:

 

As Much as REED HATES Floyd's Schtick, You're FORCING him to "Go There", Dude...

45 have TRIED, 45 have FAILED...w/Wlad, 65 have Tried, 62 have Failed...

1 + 1 = ???...




REED:dunno:

 

How DOES it NOT Change Anything, mikE???...

How is the Guy w/3 Losses (All by KO) HARDER to Beat than the Guy w/ZERO Losses, Especially Considering the Undefeated Guy has a SUPERIOR Resume???...





REED:hammert:

 

Wlad really only honed his stink after the Brewster fight though. He's definitely much harder to beat now.

 

HOW???...

"There's a BLUEPRINT for Beating Wlad Klitschko. There Is No Blueprint for Beating Floyd Mayweather. 45 have TRIED, 45 have FAILED." - Floyd Mayweather




REED:doh:

 

I think Hut meant Wlad is harder to beat now than he was before (in which case I agree) not that he is harder to beat than Floyd.


I'd say it is about as unlikely that either of them will lose in the next two years (both are getting up in age so that could change) but Wlad's weaker division has something to do with that.

 

How? Because he cheats shamelessly and the refs let him.

But as Ugo says i meant 'much harder to beat than he was' rather than harder than Floyd.

 

There is a blueprint to beat all heavyweights. There was a blue print to beat Ali, and he was better than Floyd. I know none of Ali's shit was actually paid for. But he was better than Floyd and there was a blueprint to beat him.

 

REED can Agree w/That...




REED:hammert:

 

Floyd cheats too. In and out of the ring, on and off the scale, on and off the paper, he cheats. He cheats. Period.

They all cheat, for this is the Era of Cheat. There isn't much difference between chEAT and grEAT.

 

The Blueprint for Beating Wlad has Been PAINFULLY Demonstrated...




REED:shadow:

 

There is a blueprint for beating all Heavyweights. Tyson is better than Floyd, and there is a blueprint for Mike.

Midgets get away with it, especially midgets with excessive bargaining power.

 

And at least a dozen were molested

 

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/-NEZhvXt-j4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/SbN_Q_dDo14" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>