The Avengers: Age of Ultron Trailer

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/tmeOjFno6Do" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

Looks great.

 

We'll have to wait until May :bangh:

 

Who is that dude in a close-up at 1:33 mns? I know is actor Andy Serkis, but who in the Marvel Universe is he supposed to be? and why we didn't see The Vision in this trailer?

 

Ulysses Klaw

http://comicbook.com/2014/10/23/andy-serkis-rumored-to-be-playing-ulysses-klaw-in-avengers-age-o/

 

http://www.inquisitr.com/1556497/av...meo-means-were-getting-a-black-panther-movie/

 

:will:

 

What's with the transformer

 

I'd rather watch my parents having sex.

 

::

 

::

 

::

 

Its the Hulkbuster an Iron Man armor that Tony Stark built in case he needs to battle Hulk. It is in the comicbooks and we already saw its prototype at the climax of Iron Man 3.

<img width="400" height="600" id="yui_3_5_1_5_1414111481838_2966" style="width: 329px; height: 493px;" aria-label="Iron-Man-3-Hulkbuster-Armor" alt="" src="http://tfgeekgirl.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/iron-man-3-hulkbuster-armor.jpg?w=400">

 

:bravo: that means that Black Panther might have a cameo in this film!

 

Look good....cooool.

 

Fantastic trailer. Can't wait to see Quicksilver and The Scarlet Witch.

 

Apparently the events of this film will bring as a consequence the creation of the Superheroes Registration Act which will lead to the Civil War of Captain America 3 with the Marvel superheroes battling each other on opposite sides: those in favor of the Registration (lead by Tony Stark) and those who oppose it (lead by Steve Rogers). No wonder DC chickened out and moved their Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice from the proposed May 2016 date release to March 2016.

 

Looks like Juggernaut.

 

what you thought of the X-Men III Juggernaut version?

 

Awful. I hope Marvel regain the X-men rights soon enough.

 

Looks pretty run-of-the-mill to me.
Nothing new.

Marvel's becoming a bit predictable...

 

The last one, yeah. First class, not so good.

 

"Avengers" is a Great Concept Every 2-3 Years, but NOT Yearly...

w/the Littany of Characters Involved, It's IMPOSSIBLE to Develop them all Properly & Thus, Some Get LOST in the Shuffle...The 1st "Avengers" Flick was CLEARLY Centered Around Iron Man, Captain America and Thor...Hulk & Hawkeye were like Ugly, Fat Guys in a Boy Band...Even Scarlett Johaanson's Character, as GREAT as She Looks in that Jumpsuit, is More of a BIT Player, in REED's Opinion...

@ Least w/this Flick, they're ADDING More Bit Players to the Mix, Which Should Make it Interesting...They DO Need to Change the Scenery, the LOCATION of these Flicks Though...Watching the Bad Guys Destroy the Downtown Area of a Random American City CAN Get Repetitive...

In the Future, Hopefully the Take the "Avengers" Show on the Road, to Different Countries, Planets, etc...



REED:mj:

 

REED Expected to Be BORED by "First Class", but Ended Up Looooooooooooooooving It, Before it was Over...



REED:dance2:

 

It was refreshing but not really one of the best superhero movies out there IMO. I really dug days of future past, it was great.

 

If you rewatch the trailer you'll see Hawkeye & Banner in what apparently can be Siberia (watch those soldiers!) and then at 2:16 mns you'll see a monastery and the gang of Avengers and the Ultron replicas there which clearly is not on USA. I for one WANT to see the Marvel trademark of epic street battles in major USA cities, but not at the level of destruction seen in Man of Steel, which was unheroic to say the least.

 

While I liked First Class a lot, X2: X-Men United was superior to that one.