Adonis vs Dmitry Sukhotsky

Show me where I ever, EVER described Benn or Eubanks or Calzaghe (except to troll the celtic alliance and their hatred of jazzercise) as ATG's and I'll tell you 'again' how they are. Good luck with that.

Only today you claimed Miguel Cotto had 'superb' skills which were better than Marlon Starling's. That is a remarkably retarded statement. Twice.

MTF

 

EubankS :atu:

 

Neil laughing at the fact that Chris Eubanks was called Chris Eubanks, there.

MTF

 

its amusing. why do you call him that?

 

It's his real name, they changed it to Eubank because it sounds better I guess.

 

is this some type of "his momma named him clay" shit, going on here?

 

He was born Eubanks. For loads of his fights he was referred to as 'Eubanks' by the UK comms, especially Barry McGuigan, who pretty much still calls him Eubanks. I grew up with him being referred to him as Eubanks, so I still do. As MWS says, it's his actual name.

MTF ::

 

Well once again you proved your idiocy, as you cant even comprehend a simple phrase.I never said that cotto had better skills than starling, i said that i dont think that starling skills are better than cottos, meaning theyre both superb technicians, but in different aspect of the game

 

What a remarkable post. When you say that "A doesn't have better skills than B", you implicitly also mean that "B has better skills than A", not "they have different skills, they are both superb technicians".

And I'm still waiting for you to back up your preposterous claim that I said Benn and Eubanks were ATG's. I'll be waiting a while, I suspect.

MTF

 

Not it doesnt, only for someone who's easilly confused

 

Well, quite.

MTF

 

Maybe he dropped the "s" because it sounded extra amusing with his lisp?

 

Don't be silly. This forum is a hive mind, ergo their only measurements of "knowledge" is posturing over mythical matchups and seeing who jacks off their e-peen.


Predictions on real occurrences are too relevant to actual boxing acumen to emphasized here.

 

Exhibit A.

"Hey guy, your opinion on an irrelevant fairyland matchup makes you stupid and unknowledgable! I now affirm that historical fighter A is superior to modern fighter B by having 4 or 5 like minded posters agree with me simultaneously!"

How sophomoric.

 

fail troll is fail

 

He can't be classified as a troll because trolls are generally funny, such as Hanz.

He's the most humourless little chode I've ever seen, I'm not sure he's ever said 1 funny thing.

 

have to tell you, Mr. Silent - your constant petty antagonism & grumpiness has struck me as pretty 'sophomoric' for a while.

 

For a young person he is incredibly miserable and boring.

 

There's always suicide.

 

You good blokes are merely reacting the way he wants you to

 

Do you work for travel agency of Finland these days?

 

No, but that sounds like a sweet job. Never any customer complaints. ::

 

Silent Bob is freshMANIC as well as sopHOMOric

 

Grumpiness. ::

I am not the one personally attacking people for being fans of fighters.

Or insulting their intelligence purely on speculative hypothetical boxing matches.

Hut you are actually one of the most reasonable people on the forum, largely because you lack the incredible ego of a lot of the posters here, but you fall in line with this garbage way too frequently for someone as sharp as you are.

 

Another fixture of this forum is taking half measures on fights that actually happen so they dont lose any of their precious e-cred.

Kovalev-Hopkins used to be a match where Hopkins gets KO'd in round 2 and if you think otherwise you are an idiot who deserves public shaming. I was personally bashed countless times for suggesting Hopkins would beat him. People even stated outright he would be stopped by Shumenov of all people before he embarrassed him.

But of course that was only when the fight looked like it would never happen. Now that it's days away, "Hopkins might stink a decision win".

Give me a break.

 

:atu:

 

Or perhaps, not everybody on this forum is the same person. I answered this because I said the thing you quoted and I dare you to find when and where I have said otherwise. It hasn't happened

 

Or perhaps, the more they thought about the fight, they changed their minds.

You're not very bright.

 

Shumenov is a bum. A connected bum, but a vagrant nonetheless. I'm betting the under on Hopkins kovalev. You get kovalev by ko as well as Hopkins finding a way out. For even odds

 

I think this is a good bet. I would be shocked to see Hopkins acutally knocked out clean. If Hopkins takes a hard body shot he'll right away grab his groin and claim it was a low blow.