David Telesco's defense resembled something of a professional boxer. Kovalev's resembles that of a guy who was KO'd in the ammy's and dropped by a guy with 18 losses.
telesco :atu: telesco had zero defense. he was a fucking bum. watch him get outboxed by an ancient bo James. silent nightingale has obviously never seen telesco fight funny how this faggot glosses over the fact that the journeyman who dropped kovalev also dropped oaklands finest
:: Kovalev's defense is much better than Telesco's, as is everything else about him. Telesco is a scrub. Every post Silent makes further illustrates just how clueless he is about boxing. He should really abide by his username.
Yeah, I mean how is this not trolling? I'm trying to take Silent at face value here, but come on... David fucking Telesco?
if silent nightingale is allowed to continue to post here he should be forced to have an avatar of telesco next to his name
Agreed, at times like this it's hard to believe he's not trolling. No one is this fucking stupid when it comes to boxing surely, my aunt knows more about boxing than this.
This old school shifting thing these new eurobums do against guys who pull back/back off would definitely up their chances of catching Jones i think in my mind
Absolutely, and it prevents us from being enlightened to such pearls of wisdom like Hopkins beating Kovalev, and David Telesco being better than Kovalev.
exactly... we are all closed minded and need to learn to think outside of the box about things like being good at boxing
