Feminism and Chivalry: Mutually exclusive?

Feminist women want to do all the things men do and want to act like men, and be judged the same way men are judged for promiscuity etc. Yet they probably still want men to treat them like ladies.

Can they have it both ways?

Discuss.

 

No, they fucking can't.

Let them stand up and take a piss and see how that works out for them.

Cunts.

 

word. They can't have it both ways. If a woman wants to be liberated, take off her bra, fart around men and brag about how many men she's slept with...that's her prerogative but there's a cost to that.

Feminists have double standards, they want men to be MEN; fix stuff that is broken at the house, be tough and masculine....yet they think we should accept women that are not feminine.

 

Feminists have the mindset of the classically defined criminal..........they look for shortcuts all the time, and are perennially looking to blame other people.

Look at any feminist and any recidivist criminal, you will find those two in common:

1. Easy way out mentality.

2. Blame other people.

 

As long as you bros recognize that people like you are the reason feminism exists. Chill, baby. :nana:

 

No.

Feminism existed because some women were on £2 per hour when a man doing the same work was on £4 per hour.

Women have stormed every bastion of formerly male-dominated activity.

You are too small-minded and intellectually weak it seems to draw a distinction between what went on in the 1960's and what is going on today.

Hormones for boys to keep them "gender-neutral".............covering ancient nude paintings so that feminists don't get offended {both courtesy of Sweden}

Come out of the fucking mist, Daisy.

 

Did you forget to take your meds today?

 

You actually don't have an argument.

Suppose I ring CBC and start showing them excerpts from this page and dropping your name....:dunno:

 

That would be a strange thing to do.

 

"Uh Uh have you taken your meds"

What a pleb.

http://www.thelocal.se/20131219/house-speaker-removes-painted-breasts



The deputy speaker of Sweden's Riksdag has tired of the bare breasts adorning the walls in parliament and has ensured the removal of the offending painting from the parliament's dining room.

<iframe width="300" height="250" framespacing="0" frameborder="no" scrolling="no" id="ox_1166080701_221323" name="ox_1166080701_221323"></iframe>​

The nude named Juno, painted by baroque artist G E Schröder, had hung in the guest dining room for some 30 years before deputy speaker Susanne Eberstein decided enough was enough.

Eberstein's will was the janitor's command and one day Juno was gone, and the flaunted flesh beamed down no more on visitors to Sweden's national assembly.

The artistic omission did not go unnoticed however and when news agency TT began to ask questions of the Riksdag administration department reactions were characterized mostly by embarrassed giggling.

"We routinely change paintings from time to time," was the belated official response.

As Schröder's Juno had been decorating the dining room since 1983, the response seemed a feasible one, but it soon emerged that the removal had other motivations.

The dining room in question is used for official meals with foreign dignitaries, and according to one of the other parliamentary speakers - who preferred to remain anonymous - a defrocked woman on the wall had become a sensitive matter.

"You have to think of the foreign guests, especially those from Muslim countries," the source explained.

But after a little more digging it emerged that the concerns of foreign dignitaries were a secondary consideration and the fate of Juno had in fact been sealed by a more domestic concern.

"I think it is more a feminist issue. It's tiresome (looking at) a bare-breasted woman when I sit at public dinners with foreign guests. I think it feels a little hard to sit there with men who look at us women," Social Democrat Susanne Eberstein explained.

 

Strange is saying that guys like me and Sly are some sort of chauvinist bullies when it's patently clear to anyone who wants to play along precisely what our motivations are.

 

Obviously calling a news organization and telling them about a small boxing forum would be way more strange.

 

Them's all bitches bros!

 

Remember, you are the person who went mad when that Dyke Hebe said "White Privilege" when some dude held the door open for her.

The silly bitch couldn't just accept the guy was being nice.

 

Bitches!

 

:atu: :atu: :atu:

 

Rub one out and it'll get better, man.

 

Once again, argument fail.

You don't actually have an argument.

I think I will ring your bosses and record it.

Start playing along or I will do it and then upload it to youtube.

 

"Oh my God, a man held a door for me, it must be because I am white".

 

Nah. I treat women well. Feminism exists because men used to abuse their power and then evolved to challenge every traditional idea of gender roles in society, the family etc.

What the extreme left seem to forget that, while challenging the status quo is a good thing, changing it for the sake of changing it is a bad thing as we sometimes lose key truth (don't throw out the baby with the bathwater).

The traditional roles for men and women and the way each carries themselves is tied in to what attracts each sex as well as the fact that women are the ones who get pregnant. It all goes back to that.

 

What an odd thing to say.

 

Sometimes I wonder if our evolving views is some kind of natural population control.

 

I have seen your woman. Sly gets on well with good-looking women. The notion that this is all some sort of bedroom-restricted teenage masturbating angst is a fucking joke. Any man now who raises an argument against this fucking lunacy is portrayed as some sort of a heathen, some sort of a Peter Sutcliffe character that loves to maim and put-down females.

The level of non-argument argument is ridiculous.

 

Yeah, I mostly meant you. Sly is a good friend of mine.

 

Do you honestly believe that Dykes who want their kids to be Dykes and who interpret a random act of kindness to be based solely on some white privilege are actually normal, properly-functioning people. :dunno:

If you do...you are one fucked up sad-case.

 

Didn't the same person do both those things?

 

Oh that's very clever, very liberal....whatever you do, don't allow anyone to see you in open disagreement with a non-white person, it might raise all sorts of negative connotations.

 

And then some. She's got some form, that broad.