Feminism and Chivalry: Mutually exclusive?

Not really. Not yet.

 

being gay isn't a choice. daft discussion.

 

Being a woman is opcorn:

 

You've done it now.

 

reminds me of this (how the fuk does embedding work)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sz6HIcnh26I

 

On a YouTube page you should see "share" as an option... Click on that and then click on "embed" ... Copy the entire weird looking bunch of shit and paste it here and click post reply or whatever

 

Whether or not being gay is a choice is irrelevant, a gay person was not generated by gay people...so cannot be equated with a race. Natural sexuality is hetero, simply because it is the natural inclination of sexual creatures...so that the species can continue. Having urges for the same sex, may be inherent from "birth", but that doesn't make those urges normal. Being schizophrenic, or having multiple personality disorder may be inherent from birth too, but that doesn't make it normal.

 

Irrelevant. See my response to Steve Dave. Pedophiles claim that being attracted to kids isn't a choice also. There are many perverted urges that people have from birth....you can't equate people with these urges with a race....just because they were born with them.

 

Hanz and Ken Patera had a butt baby.

 

Hanzy is pregnant with his third butt baby...

KEN PATERA'S THIRD BUTT BABY!!!!

 

isn't relevant to what? The way they should be treated? I think its koo' to treat people with schizophrenia or multiple personality disorder with compassion & dignity by the by

 

You can equate the treatment of two groups when they're both subject to obtuse prejudice.

 

you are welcome!

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Sz6HIcnh26I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

I treat gays with compassion and dignity too. This discussion was never about how we should treat them...that is a strawman.

 

Christians suffer more prejudice than gays in 2015, let alone blacks. Everyone loves gays these days except for a small minority.

 

You just equated them to paedophiles and schizophrenics. Whatever the discussions about (?) attitudes like that're probably relevant to it

 

Right. things have improved

 

Besides gays can hide their identity if they wished to, blacks can't do that. Blacks have children which would be subjected to the same prejudice...gays don't generate gays.

My point is: IT'S SO FUCKING STUPID TO EQUATE THE TWO!

 

Is it stupid to equate bigotry directed towards them? If so why?

 

I responded to the issue of "being born or choice"...giving other examples. That doesn't mean I equated them.

 

Depends on what you call bigotry towards gays in this case. Is saying that marriage is only for men and women, bigotry towards gays in your definition?

 

You brought them up as examples of other things which were 'abnormal' or 'perverted', not other things that were generically innate.

 

Nah, i wouldn't say so.

 

Usual gay response to a question they cannot answer........."Would you...........to Black people............" :wack:

 

i don't really care about gays. They all seem happy enough, i dont think they're being 'oppressed', they've never harmed me. No idea why we end up talking about them so much tbh

 

Sure, all examples of being abnormal although born that way. Homosexuality is abnormal....I mean this is logical. Biology etc....the normal thing is for men to be attracted to women and vice versa.

 

It's "PRIDE WEEK" so i guess they'll come up a few times this week.

 

They are happy.

 

:: ::