Making a Murderer

Steven Avery had a really good defense lawyer team. If you don't have the money, than you are fucked. You have to deal with the lawyer that the state appoints for you.

 

Yes I believe he is innocent. The first things the cops did when the victim was missing was pointing in Avery's direction. There is just no evidence that Avery did this, so he should have been released. Let me repeat what I posted before.

The most troubling stuff:
- There was only DNA of Steven Avery on the key. No DNA of the victim.
- The DNA analyst was called by detective Fassbender and he asked him to put the victim's DNA on the bullet. The analyst wrote this on a note and admitted that this happened. I can't believe that Fassbender and the analyst were not prosecuted for this. How could they have continued the trial with shit like this happening? The judge should have ended this immediately imo.
- There was no traces of blood or DNA from the victim found in Steven Avery's trailer or in his garage, while the prosecuters claimed that she was stabbed and shot 11 times. A professional would have been needed to erase DNA evidence like that
- Blood was removed from the tube that had Avery's blood in it. The seal of the box had been cut.
- They claimed Steven Avery's blood was in the car. But why would Steven put the woman in the car if he killed her in the garage and burned her next to the trailer?

There was no evidence against Avery, yet he was convicted to life in prison. Unbelievable. I had to hold my tears a couple of times. Hopefully justice will be served.



On November 2nd 8 pm someone deleted voicemail messages from her phone and her ex-boyfriend had the password. So he probably deleted them. Why did he delete them? He should have been the prime suspect.

Isn't it weird that an ex-boyfriend hacks the account of the woman?

 

Bunting also brought in a female expert who testified that the metgod used by the FBI dis not prove that the blood did not come out of the vial.

 

My jaw hit the ground when it became clear rhat detective Fassbender called the DNA expert and told her to but Bachmans DNA on the bullet.

 

The game is rigged TKO. The detectives and prosecuters weren't after the truth. They just wanted to win the case and get Avery behind bars.

 

And what about the witness that said that Teresa many times didn't answer her phone? She said 'oh no not him again'. Someone was constantly stalking her with phonecalls. The witness offered to answer the phone and tell him not to call anymore. This was probably the ex boyfriend. The same ex boyfriend that hacked her voicemail and deleted messages. The same boyfriend that can't remember the last time he saw her. Why wasn't this guy a suspect? It is clear that in most cases the killer is someone close to the victim. Yet, the boyfriend wasn't aa suspect.

 

There is so much wrong with this case. Avery needs to be released immediately.

 

It gets weirder. The one juror that happened to leave because of an accident involving his daughter, happened to be the juror that wanted to vote AGAINST conviction. Coincidence? I don't think so. One of the jurors was the father of one of the local cops and he wanted Avery to get convicted. Another juror that wanted to vote against conviction fealed threathened by the cops father and that is why he voted for conviction. Take a look at what the juror and his daughter had to say on facebook. The van in front of the daughter suddenly slammed the breaks and she rear-ended them. The cops were there within two minutes while she didn't call 911 and there wasn't a police station in the area where they were. Someone needs to get Steven Avery out of jail as soon as possible and someone must prosecute these cops.

http://jonsjailjournal.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/making-murderer-update-9-car-crash.html

 

This is what juror Richard Mahler had said:

After the trial, I found out ... [one juror] was the father of a Manitowoc County Sheriff's deputy. Another juror, his wife works for the Manitowoc County Clerk's Office ... I thought to myself, they shouldn't have been on the jury. That was a conflict of interest.

http://www.bustle.com/articles/1337...s-over-the-jury-selection-in-the-murder-trial

Even the jury selection was fucked up. Free Steven Avery !!!

 

Mahler also told People about a concerning conversation he allegedly had with one of the sitting jurors after the trial had ended (the "when he was younger" comment likely refers to Avery's prior criminal history, having once burglarized a bar and, more worryingly, immolated a cat). Mahler's recall of the conversation is the only evidence that it actually happened.

... his statement was, 'Just think of all those things he did when he was younger.' I thought to myself, 'Are you serious?' This trial was supposed to be based on the evidence that was presented to us. You're telling us that you convicted him based on what he did when he was younger. I did a lot of bad things when I was younger. That doesn't mean I deserve to be locked up for life.​