Fury-wald pussy rematch is signed for July 9

Every fighter loses the ability to pull the trigger.

 

Well stated.

 

There is Absolutely NO Argument for Wlad Being "the Best Heavyweight of All Time"....

NONE...





REED:nono:

 

::

Exactly.

One could argue he's not even the best Klitschko of all time.

 

Mike comment is so idiotic that it didn't even deserved a reply

 

If Wlad is willing to let his right hand go when in range early, we'll be in for a better fight, that's for sure.

 

word. Lol

 

If you can't make an argument for Wlad being the best of all time, then you aren't very bright.

Personally, I do have him behind Lewis and Vitali and perhaps some others, but he has some great credentials and some great physical abilities. His primary flaw is something that hasn't been exploited in about a decade, despite defending a belt regularly throughout that time.

 

Wlad is a great heavyweight, proven with dominance and longevity, and so I disagree with those that label him a bum. But now you've gone the other extreme

The following are ahead of him for starters:

Ali, Louis, Holmes, Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson.

 

No, if you're trying to make an argument for Wlad being the GOAT you just want to argue.

 

I said best, not greatest.

 

Even "best".

Wlad's mediocre chin and stamina make it difficult to rank him at the top. Best of all time wouldn't have lost to sanders and Brewster like that. He wasn't green at those times either, he was in his prime.

Wlad at his best is formidable no doubt, as an offensive force, but his vulnerabilities are too glaring.

 

wald pussy

what's this "Wlad" stuff?

 

I just can't shake the fact that an unbiased ref would have dq'd the cunt in about 17 of his 20 odd title defences

 

On behalf of FightBeat members...fixed, just for you. opcorn:

 

This fight is interesting?

To who?

 

mikE and Irish.

 

Talent wise I think Wlad is up there, but in terms of how his career has actually panned out, no. I guess you have to make him a great (at the lower end of the scale) purely on longevity, but in real terms, no.

 

and Ugo

 

that and the DQs would've been accrued against a bunch of shit heavyweights

 

I've always said the thing about wlad is with his size, talent, skill, and willingness to be a bitch he could conceivably beat anyone ever on a good night, and maybe even dominantly. At the same time he seemed very vulnerable, like any fight he wasn't in complete control of was automatically a tough fight. That means something since he didn't fight a lot of great fighters.

I get the argument for him being "the best" because there's only a handful of guys that really deserve to be favored over him and he's a tough match up for them. But realistically he'd get knocked out by a lot of guys that he deserves to be favored over.

 

Realistically,he would make shit of the guys Marciano defended against, not to mention Marciano himself.

 

wald pussy's athletisicm alone gives Marciano fits.

 

Let's be honest for a few seconds. As much as I despise the giant pussy, he would cautiously and reluctantly destroy Marciano

 

fury's been coming out with some mad shit recently, even by his standards.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/36038621


"I'm 24 stone at the minute,"
"I'm out drinking, partying 24/7".
"I have achieved my goals. I've got no more to achieve."
"I'm not interested in the sport."

the rematch may be even more listless and depressing than the first fight

 

He's going to get flattened, I'm telling you.

 

Total bullshit and mindgames

 

I think Fury likes a bit of the sniff.

 

Eating is his problem. Not drugs.