Which was the worse scorecard...

Discussion in 'General Boxing Discussion' started by Destruction and Mayhem, Sep 17, 2017.

  1. mexican wedding shirt

    mexican wedding shirt The Greatest of Are Times

    Precisely. He controlled the fight AND outlanded his foe in almost every round.
     
  2. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Silly semantics alert, but I dont think ggg controlled the fight as much as alvarez' concessions to his own shitty stamina did. When the two actually exchanged alvarez probably got the better of more of them....except those exchanges punctuated long periods of alvarez circling around or lying on the ropes trying to do as little as possible because he knew if threw > 40 shots two rounds running he'd turn into a pumpkin
     
  3. Jeffy

    Jeffy Undisputed Champion

    It's because he couldn't handle GGG's pressure.
     
    mexican wedding shirt likes this.
  4. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Not really. Ggg won rounds because he applied pressure but alvarez paces himself the same way every fight. His stamina blows and sucks and blows, hard.
     
  5. mexican wedding shirt

    mexican wedding shirt The Greatest of Are Times

    Like Jeffy just said, I more saw it as as soon as Golovkin turned up the pressure, Alvarez looked a bit lost at how to deal with it. It was when Golovkin was less active that Alvarez was more active.

    Contrary to you saying that Alvarez thrives on pressure fighters Hut Hut, I thought that the rounds that Golovkin applied the most pressure were his most successful by FAR, he basically shut Alvarez down and just had him in retreat mode.
     
    Jeffy likes this.
  6. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

  7. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    7-5, 8-4 are reasonable to me

    9-3 is a bit extreme, to me

    6-6 I cannot see at all, there's no way Alvarez got six rounds
     
    Slice N Dice likes this.
  8. REEDsART

    REEDsART MATCHMAKER

    THIS...




    REED:cool:
     
  9. REEDsART

    REEDsART MATCHMAKER

    There's Literally NO Justification for Adelaide Byrd EVER Judging a Boxing Match Again...

    Her and C.J. Ross, Who Infamously Scored Floyd-Canelo a DRAW, DEFECATED Upon the Privilege of Having THE Best Seats in the House, for High Profile Fights...

    Fuck Them...


    REED:cool:
     
  10. Erratic

    Erratic "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Both awful scorecards. I would say Byrd's was worse, or it was farther from my scorecard. I had Leonard-Hagler 6-6, so Guerra's 10-2 was 4 rounds away from mine. I had Golovkin up 7-4-1, so Byrd's 10-2 was 5 and a half rounds away from my card.

    There were some close rounds, but you'd have to be pretty generous to Canelo to have it even. The last 3 rounds, which Canelo won on all 3 judges cards, were all close rounds.

    Some of the scorecards Canelo has gotten over the years is just outrageous.

    Another one that is up there among worst scorecards is the judge who had Paul Williams beating Sergio Martinez 119-110 in their first fight.
     
    cdogg187 likes this.
  11. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    don trella gave round 7 to alvarez and ended up with the even card
     
  12. puerto rock

    puerto rock WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    I honestly thought that 118-110 score was a mistake when I first heard it. I thought for SURE that had to be for Golovkin, even though I had it 9-3
     
    mexican wedding shirt likes this.
  13. mikE

    mikE "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    If we start playing the which rounds were scored for Canelo, I doubt it will take too many to get to the draw or worse. Hell, we can probably get to the 118-110 card pretty quickly. As stated above and in the main thread, when you land the best shot(s) within a round, it's pretty common to get that round. Canelo landed his best shots far more often than GGG. GGG landed his 2nd tier shots far more often than Canelo and there were a lot more of them. Throw in jabs and it's easy to see why most of us think GGG deserved it, but Canelo's bigger shots make it a fight that might have seemed different at ringside.

    Oh yeah, I say this as a guy who predicted Canelo doing better at the end of the fight, but picked GGG to clearly win. Both of these guys starch 160 lb Duran, by the way.
     
  14. Anthony

    Anthony Admin Staff Member

    I disagree, but even if he did, he was losing the jab battle and the ring generalship battle in every round.
     
    mexican wedding shirt likes this.
  15. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Tbf, Ring generaliship isn't a thing. Punching people in the face and torso wins rounds

    If agree he definitely lost the battle of the jabs tho and imo that shoulda won golovkin the fight. I just think a lot of rounds were a case of quality vs quantity....you could probably have made a reasonable case for canelo in 6 of them
     
  16. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    Listening to it being announced, as someone who bet on golovkin, i figured that card would be for him. I guess I temporarily forget it was Byrds. But for someone to have such a card you'd figure it would be for golovkin based on how the fight played out
     
    mexican wedding shirt likes this.
  17. Canelo isn't getting the benefit of either his body punching or his accuracy. Golovkin took the punches well but he was getting hit with the better shots. Listen....I can see a case for GGG winning, especially because of the consistent jab and Canelo's lulls in action....I could even give GGG 8 rounds, but considering many of the rounds that I could score for GGG can also be scored for Canelo based on the more "meaty" punches I think it's ludicrous to cry robbery on a draw verdict
     

Share This Page