Garcia vs Easter: Final Predictions

Val and Muzse both posting on the same day????? Jesus Christ, it feels like 2002 on this thread.

 

OF COURSE Mikey would have a better chance of beating Cherry Garcia than of beating Spence.

That goes without saying.

 

Both are comparable, but Spence is a better fighter indeed, pound 4 pound.

 

He might be. Mikey last two fights makes me think he might not be as good as i initially thought he was.

Easter and lipinets are probably at the same level than petterson, and spence looked much better against peterdude than mikey did against them

 

I dont see any evidence that spence is better than garcia skill wise. bigger and stronger, yes. despite not having gotten a match vs an elite opponent, garcia has fought a consistently higher caliber of opposition than spence.

 

So you think that Spence is more skilled than Garcia because he fought someone who is “probably” on the same level as Lipinets and Easter, but looked better doing it??

That is some ignorant logic.

 

Youre an unrecoverable imbecile loaded. First of all, who said anything about being more skilled??? Fighter A can be better than fighter B, even if hes less skilled.

Secondly, of course the quality of the performances against similar opposition is a good way to gauge who's better between 2 fighters, even if Its not the only criteria

 

spence did what was expected vs peterson, a naturally smaller and inactive opponent. ran right over him.

garcias last 4 opponents were all more legit than peterson

 

That bum Broner is not more legit than Peterson.

 

No it isn’t. Who’s to say it is even similar opposition?? Because you say so?? Too many variables involved.

 

Considering broner is a lot bigger than garcia and spence is a lot bigger than peterson, the broner winner is considerably more legit for garcia

 

Broner, Easter, Lipinets and especially the yugoslav bum are not more legit fighters than Peterson.
Another gem from the forum idiot

 

You're one confused clown loaded. This is a totally different argument than the one you made before, and is even more ridiculous

 

Mikey was an overwhelming favorite over Broner. So despite being smaller, its not as if he did what was unexpected.

ZlatechenBum damn sure ain't a fighter even close to Peterson's level.

If we're talking recent resumes, then Spence has the edge because Brook is a different league of fighter than anyone Mikey has beaten in recent years.

 

Funny how you always resort to childish insults when you don’t have a logical argument.

 

Why?? Because you say so? He explained earlier why he thought that they are legit and it makes sense to most everyone but you, who labels everyone else on the forum as the “village idiot”. Go figure.

 

garcia broner odds opened around 2 or 3-1. maybe the money poured in on garcia and it got to 5-1. spence was 25 or 30 to 1 favorite over inactive peterson.

 

It made sense to no one, bar maybe you, loaded, my autistic little friend. Pretty much everyone laugh at his ridiculous suggestion on this very thread, yet youre too intellectually limited to even realise it

 

You are delusional

 

Bum ass Limpnuts barely scrapping by (if even) journey man Erik Bone. L-E-G-I-T

 

Barely scraping by

 

Mikey fighting Spence is madness, I mean, why? He has no chance of winning, it's basically a suicide mission. If he really wants a belt at 147, then Danny is obviously his best bet.

But he should really try and get the Lomachenko fight made, the guy has the frame of a featherweight, he has no business at 147.

Lomachenko Vs Mikey at 135 is a great fight. Lomachenko wins of course, but it is a great matchup.