Cooper Didn't Have the Greatest Chin But He was a Free Swinger that Could BANG a Bit... Joshua Obviously Doesn't Have the Best Punch Resistance Either But He's BETTER Than Bert Cooper...Joshua Wins 7 Of 10 Times... REED
You're being ridiculous lately. Cooper was a lot better than Kirkland, but MOST OF ALL... Joshua cant shine Tommy's ball sack. Cooper almost had a prime Holy out, but you think it's a mismatch between him and a fragile fraud like AJ? Your predictions have been a joke lately. Cooper is a very live dog against GayJ. Kirkland would have zero zero zero chance against Hearns.
Please. Cooper wasn't a lot better than anyone. The guy was never even a top-10 contender, nor even very close to being one. And of course I know Joshua is nowhere near as talented as Hearns. The point of the hyperbole, which you missed, was that it is not plausible to call a bout a 50:50 fight just because the clearly better guy has a soft chin and the lesser guy can punch. That is misleading. And yes, Cooper nearly beat Holyfield. So would you give him a very good shot in a rematch? I don't believe that, and neither would I. I'll keep making ridiculous picks, and I assume you keep on choosing the evidence you like
Coooer would be 40/60 to beat Joshua if say he was the last minute replacement opponent for Big Baby Miller who fought nothing like him Kinda like how Holyfield got stunned by Cooper himself even though that probably would never happen if he was the original opponent, because the original opponent was dancing Francesco Damiani
It was a ridiculous statement by Ugo. It's downright insulting considering of those four, you only have 1 all time great. If StiffJay even dreams of being as good as Tommy Hearns he better wake up and apologize.
It is called a hyperbole, which is a figure of speech used to emphasize an expression. Like "Buddy McGirt is a cowardly mouse" is not an outright lie, even though he isn't an actual mouse. It is a metaphor that tells us something about him. Get it? Should I write it in black and white?
The hyperbole makes no sense here, because only one of those matchups is a mismatch. Hearns-Kirkland = Grosssssssssss mismatch. Tommy would win by brutal KO 100/100 times. Joshua-Cooper: Joshua is the favorite, but Cooper is a live underdog. Joshua wouldn't win 10/10, let alone 100/100.
