Frank Tate vs Gerald McClellan

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by Xplosive, May 20, 2021.

  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    56,691
    Likes Received:
    13,755
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Who wins?
     
  2. Greynotsoold

    Greynotsoold WBC Champion

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2020
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    717
    Gender:
    Male
    Skill-wise, pretty evenly matched.
    I think that they are on different sides of the weigh in change when it comes to making weight so there would probably be a significant size difference. That would matter because I don't think Tate is likely to stop McClellan but I think that McClellan can certainly stop Tate.
     
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    56,691
    Likes Received:
    13,755
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Tate fought in the 24-hour weigh-in era and fought as high as 175, losing twice to Virgil Hill.
     
    Greynotsoold likes this.
  4. Greynotsoold

    Greynotsoold WBC Champion

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2020
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    717
    Gender:
    Male
    I am assuming that the fight is at 160.
    When I say that they were on different sides of the weigh in change what I am referring to is the approach to making weight and I am speculating a bit.
    Frank Tate was pretty much done at 160 by the time McClellan turned pro. I know that McClellan, at his peak as a middleweight was actually a cruiserweight. I am guessing that Tate was either a chubby middleweight or a super middle.
     

Share This Page