Michael Spinks vs. Roy Jones, Jr. @ Heavy & @ 175

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by broadwayjoe, Aug 27, 2008.

  1. broadwayjoe

    broadwayjoe Undisputed Champion

    Who wins?
     
  2. Ugotabe Kidding

    Ugotabe Kidding WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    I might be in minority but I'd pick Roid. Spinks made a better career but prime for prime Jones was better
     
  3. whiskey

    whiskey Czarcasm

    Not sure but i think this would be a pretty stinky fight.

    Spinks would look to dictate the fight with his jab and try to land "The Jinx". Roy would leap with some power shots and throw some quick rights over the jab.

    I see most punches not landing and a lot of feinting going on.
     
  4. Explosivo

    Explosivo Undisputed Champion

    Roy Jones at both weights
     
  5. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Yeah, I simply think Jones was a better fighter.
     
  6. jaws1216

    jaws1216 "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    this trouble here is that a rangy-tall awkward fighter with solid timing and handspeed himself would be a tough matchup for Roy.

    I think its a toss-up at either weight, because The Jinx could certainly put Roy to sleep with a well timed counter, and Roy could certainly win rounds in chess match.
     
  7. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Oh for sure. Spinks was awesome. I'm probably over-rating Roy, but my eyes keep telling me he's one of the best fighters I've ever seen.
     
  8. Jake

    Jake WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Not sure why, but I'd pick Spinks at LHW yet Roy at heavyweight.
     
  9. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    I think I agree with you. I'm one of Roy's biggest fans, but I think Spinks is being underrated here. Mike was a BEAST at 175. Now I'm not one who thinks Roy had a bad chin in his prime, but Roy never faced a puncher at 175 anywhere near Spinks. If Mike landed The Jinx full force on Roy, theres a pretty good possibility Roy would be on his back out cold. But then again on the flip side, Spinks never faced anyone as fast, elusive, or as overall talented as Roy. Its a tough ass fight to pick for me.

    A boring chess match prob favors Roy.

    If the fight became anything exciting, then Spinks' power would be the differance.
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2008
  10. joony

    joony "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    i wonder what folks would've said had Stinks senior retired unbeaten.

    anyhow, tough fight to pick although spinks had much much superior competition at 175 than roy.
     
  11. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Wouldn't make a difference when it comes to this match-up.
     
  12. jaws1216

    jaws1216 "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    the Lt. Heavy Spinks was undefeated in the deepest and most talented division 175 has ever had.

    I actually would like to go further and say I'd take Spinks at either weight. Granted he didn't face anyone of Roy's skills (nobody has) but he did beat multiple great fighters of many different approaches. I think the flipside is that Roy never fought anyone close to Spinks combo of talent/style.

    I mean the best analogue for Roy's Career is the Tarver fights, and say what you will about where he stood in his career at that point, but those are really the only markers we have for his approach to a tall-rangy counterpuncher.
     
  13. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Come on Jaws, Spinks was long retired by the time he was 35.
     
  14. Jake

    Jake WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    These last two lines sum up my thoughts completely. At 175, I could see Spinks controlling the action as he'd be at full strength. So too would Roy, to a degree, but not as much as when he was at 168, and now against a truly great LHW.

    Both were unnatural (read: small) heavyweights, which is why I don't see strength being an advantage in either directions. That's why I'd favor Roy to win a decision.
     
  15. joony

    joony "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    it's pick-em even if they both fought stratigically. spinks wasn't the most exciting guy either.
     
  16. jaws1216

    jaws1216 "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    I just meant he hadn't fought a style that we could call similar to Spinks until Tarver...I mean even thats a stretch.

    Although with regards to Age, RJJ has got to be the least hit fighter in history, so it isn't like his 35 was a ring-old 35...whereas Spinks had been in some battles to taht point.

    ill expand on this when i get home...
     
  17. Jake

    Jake WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    I guess jaws never made it home last night. hope everything's alright
     
  18. jaws1216

    jaws1216 "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    no internet access at my new place in Long Beach...im off to class again...then work, then class until 10PM PCT.

    So yeah, Spinks jinxes Roy to Sleep....that is all:cheer:
     
  19. Free Ike

    Free Ike WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Blah shut it. We all know Roy would never have fought Spinks. He would demand 99.5% to .05% of the purse. Spinks would laugh and reject it. Roy would fight a garbage man on HBO. Roys fans would say that Spinks would lose or did lose to someone else and Roy could never lose so in reality Roy already beat Spinks. Fuck Roy and all who love him.
     
  20. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    :cheer:

    as foreman says, "no better said."
     
  21. Joe King

    Joe King WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    :crafty:Roy blows him out quicker than Tyson did.
     
  22. Dog Jones

    Dog Jones WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    I favor Stinks confidently at HW
    I still favor Spinks at LHW but not as confidently as I felt for a HW match-up.
     
  23. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    I'd have my money on Spinks at either weight.
     
  24. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    I tend to favor Spinks, especially at 175, because I think that he is a nightmare style-wise for Roy (and for a lot of other guys) ... this would be two great fighters in a BAD fight... awkward, lots of missing, fucked up angles, the whole bit

    if you could stay awake or stay tuned for the whoe fight you'd see a close decision in Spinks favor

    at heavyweight, I kind of agree with Jake and X that I prefer Jones' chances, I think he carried his speed better up there than Spinks did

    that said, beating John Ruiz is a hell of a lot different than beating Larry Holmes, regardless of the fact that Larry was in decline... still, Ruiz was soundly defeated, no controversy, unlike Spinks/Holmes
     
  25. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Spinks. Bigger & better.
     

Share This Page