IandI's Little Yellow Bus ... Put on your crash helmet and come on in!

everybody agrees with you

 

I see Joe wants to believe that obama hangs out with terrorists but doesn't have the balls to show us proof.

RIghtwingers :atu:

 

From wikipedia...

That was easy.


TFK

 

Yes it was easy not to answer my questions.

WHO DID HE TARGET? NAMES OF PEOPLE PLEASE

WHO DID HE KILL? NAMES OF PEOPLE PLEASE

WHAT WAS HE CONVICTED OF? NAME OF CASE PLEASE

 

You're only a terrorist if you kill people?

TFK

 

Who said he was a terrorist? you? republicans?

How long was his sentence?

 

InI, c'mon man, it's Sunday. Why don't you quit being wrong about everything for one day, and just relax and watch some football?


TFK

 

You aren't a terrorist if you explicitly state that your goal is not to terrorize people, and then make sure that your actions don't terrorize people, Hence the fact that he and the weathermen KILLED NOBODY.

NOPE NOT A TERRORIST.

Someone who kills people or innocent people to make a political statement, that is more like a terrorist.

 

Surely there was a case where he was convicted of being a terrorist, just tell us the case.

:mj:

 

I'm not gonna waste my Sunday arguing over the definition of'terrorist'. Let's just both agree that as usual, you're wrong and I'm right, and then we can get back to football.

TFK

 

You haven't been convicted of being a boy touching child molester, that doesn't mean you're not one.

TFK

 

CLASSIC

TFK gets his ass kicked in a thread then resorts to personal attacks.

WHO DID HE TERRORIZE?

WHO DID HE KILL?

WHO DID HE TRY TO KILL?

WHO DID HE TARGET?

Name the case that he was convicted in?

 

You don't have to kill anyone to be a terrorist. You don't have to be convicted of anything either.

Here is the dictionary.com definition for terrorist...

And here's the definition of terrorism...

Now please show me where it says you have to kill people to be a terrorist. Show me where it says you have to be convicted or anything to be a terrorist.

You lose again, InI.

TFK

 

So we agree, that he didn't kill anyone, didn't threaten anyone, didn't attempt to kill or threaten anyone.

We agree on that right.

The definition you listed says it's someone who terrorizes someone, WHO DID HE TERRORIZE???

How can you terrorize someone when you explicityly state that your goal isn't to kill anyone, and that you aren't even trying to kill anyone. If that is what you call a terrorist, than that would include me and you as terrorists, since we don't target any human beings violently and don't intend to right?

 

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

You're so smart.


TFK

 

This debate beats the crap out of Obama-McCain on any poll

 

ter·ror·ist
1. a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism.
2. a person who terrorizes or frightens others.
3. (formerly) a member of a political group in Russia aiming at the demoralization of the government by terror.
4. an agent or partisan of the revolutionary tribunal during the Reign of Terror in France.
5. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of terrorism or terrorists: terrorist tactics.

1. HE NEVER ADVOCATED TERRORISM.
2. HE NEVER TERRORIZED OR FRIGHTENED OTHERS
3. HE NEVER WAS A MEMBER OF A RUSSIAN ORGANIZATION
4 HE NEVER WAS A MEMBER OF A FRENCH ORGANIZATION
5. VAGUE AND HE NEVER PRACTICED TERRORIST TACTICS.

Quote:



ter·ror·ism
1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.

1. HE NEVER USED VIOLENCE TO COERCE ANYONE.
2. HE NEVER TRIED TO MAKE ANYONE AFRAID.
3. HE NEVER GOVERNED OVER ANYONE.

 

Yep, and he never killed anyone, never attempted to kill anyone, never intended to kill anyone, never wanted to kill anyone. All of those things combined means.

 

I don't think TFK knows the difference between vandalism and murder.

Or he may think that a piece of metal has the same status as a human being, as if the destruction of a thing is the same as destruction of life.

TEAM FUCKIN AMERICA

 

You're the last person to bitch about someone not knowing the meaning of a word.

Sorry InI, I'd argue with you, but you don't even have an argument to argue against.

TFK

 

How much free time do you have TFK? Why are you wasting it with this turd?

 

It's like playing Madden on rookie level. You always win by like 150 points, but sometimes it's fun just to see how one sided you can make it.

TFK

 

::

 

dictionary.com can't settle your debate. 'terrorism' is a controversial word with a number of distinct definitions - that's why your politicians like to (ab)use it so much. nelson mandela at one time pursued a campaign of sabotage; under some definitions that makes him a terrorist, under others he isn't.

of course the real culprit here is the repugnant palin for deliberately exploiting that emotive word, sensationalist politics of the worst kind, like goebbels but less sophisticated. whether ayers is a 'terrorist' or not is irrelevant; it's quite clear that they're evoking images of bin laden, and ayers was never anything of the sort.

 

Not according to TFK and JOE

 

Why is this shit being brought up again? I mean doesn't stupid ass Palin already know that this has already been brought up and discussed. What a fucken idiot she is. One would think from all the reading material she couldn't name she would already know. I'll Holla 5000

 

And the rest of the world as well.

Except of course for the dopes who consider bombing police headquarters, the Pentagon and the Capitol Building mere acts of vandalism.

TFK

 

but like the saying goes, you don't always need fire, sometimes smoke is enough. it doesn't matter how rehashed the argument is, there will always be enough people who were otherwise clueless to it who will now second guess their voting choice.

the republicans know damn well who theyre speaking to when they bring up this stuff.

And at the risk of pulling a Petre, I said a while ago that Shillary trying to align herself w/ Obama will hurt more than help. All this shit being brought up now was initially raised (or at least re-submitted) when she was busy dragging his name/camapign through the mud. All they're doing is taking pages out of her playbook (or as CNN now calls their campaign strategy, "once again going to the reset button.")