Weights from London - Haye=Barrett predictions

MARKED. Great prediction. Shall nobody say, you don´t know what you talking about.

 

If by truth, you mean a fat sucky pig than I agree. He'd beat Haye.Haye got caught by wide slow and punches that made contact at best and he looked terrified. Monte dropped him too::::Haye would get stopped by that Mexican swine.

 

When did Cliff Couser Become the Litmus Test???...


REED::

 

By beating the great Monte in 2 rounds. That catapulted him into the top 3.

 

D MAN pulled it off again. He's very consistent.

 

::

 

So far, all Haye has done is fight Mormeck and talk a bunch of bullshit. He's fought NOBODY ELSE and still has managed to work an L onto his record.

For all the shit you talk about Wladamir, you're a straight up hypocrite for hyping David fucking Haye.

 

Wanna tell him something he doesn't know??

 

:bears::bears::bears:

 

This thread is Hall of Shame worthy.

 

It's been said before and it shoudl be said again- DMAN is the antithesis of fight predictions. Whoever he picks, you should back heavily against.

Your house, in fact.

MTF

 

Haye is at least a live body. Your hatred is obscene

MTF

 

Yeah right. Lets all blindly love a guy who's done SFA, while shit on all the other heavies who have amounted about the same number of quality wins.

Haye has the mouth and the faggy model looks...thats all that sets him aside. His talent and abilities sure don't.

 

Yeah all Haye has done in his six year career is unify his division? Wlad done that yet in 12 years? OK. :kidcool:

 

He didn't unify shit, he beat the guy who did that (something even Oneil bell managed to do, without being dropped in a fucking heap) and some useless pommy scrub who picked up Johnny Nelson's belt out of the trash can.

He unified as much as Zab Judah did @ 147.

 

Who the fuck is on about 'blindly loving' anyone? I said he was a live body- in fact; that's pretty much what I've said from minute one.

As per your usual contributions of late- nothing of what you say has much substance and even less relates to anything anyone else seems to have said...

Sad

MTF

 

So he won those belts, yes?

And he won that belt, yes?

In other words, he unified three of the four worthwhile belts.

Argue all you want, but to throw a load of shit about 'dropped in a heap' and 'pommy scrub' does NOT detract from the fact that he had no belts, then two, then three, after consecutive KTFO wins.

MTF

 

Look, you singled out my posting, which has been to no one in particular, so don't act as if what I say directly relates to you. There are guys on this board (and thousands elsewhere) who are going crazy over Haye and with nothing to base it on. Some guy on this thread "Haye is now #3 @ heavy". Wow. He beat Monte fucking Barrett...and a shot one at that. Lordy me. This doesn't get your ire up and yet you turn it towards me? Save me the trouble of having to explain myself. We've spoke about Haye more than enough.

If you don't think I have anything to contribute, ignore me. Thats your choice.

 

I'm not denying that. I'm just not at all impressed with any of it, while you lot are. So I must have hateful because of it. No other possible reason at all.

 

If you quote my quote whilst replying, I'll do likewise.

Your posting was linked to mine, hence my reply. Simple as that.

MTF

 

That is not what you said, you said...

That's entirely different to saying you aren't impressed by it. That's a blanket denial.

Haye is NOT No 3 HW. He is NOT the 'next big thing' at HW. But he did unify the CW titles. Three of them, in fact.

MTF

 

You are the one who replied to a post of mine, that was quoting Dariusz, not you.

Now, ignore me.

 

He unified three belts. Fine. Your definition of the word isn't the same as mine. He beat a guy who unified belts and some guy who held a belt. Thats what passes for unification, whatever.

He wasn't undisputed...something you've said in the past.

 

Well, he won some belts then he won some more belts. That counts as unifying belts Tam- whether you have a different 'definition' or not.

And of course he was undisputed CW No1. Who said otherwise? Bloody Steve Cunningham?

Seriously?

MTF

 

No no. Don't twist words. Undisputed in the boxing world has a very specific meaning. It has nothing to do about rankings and everything to do about claim and belts.

 

Seriously, this is ridiculous. Can we please stop wasting each others time.

 

Me? Twist words? Don't be daft...I mean you are the guy who said that Haye 'didn't unify shit', after all...

I couldn't give a fucking monkey's bell-end about 'specific meanings'; undisputed takes it's ordinary meaning, simple as that.

He had three of the four belts and had beat the concenus No1 in his backyard to get two of them.

There is not a single sane or knowledgable person who did not believe that Haye was the best 200lb-er after the Enzo fight. That means that he was undisputed IMHO.

MTF

 

Of course...but don't be saying shit like "Haye didn't unify shit".

You can mock his HW credentials, call him chinny, laugh at the Thompson loss or whatever. But if you say daft things like "Haye didn't unify shit", expect a Haye fan to pipe up...

MTF

 

You piped up way before it, which is the problem with this entire fucking scenario.

Enjoy your evening.

 

dsimon writes:

Crickey has been on a role.... its not you. Haye did what he should do. It was unfortunate that it was a risk with minimal reward... but he knew that taking the fight with Barrett.