This may explain Mosley's 2nd win over DLH

The funny part is Shane got a gift in that fight too.Shane is one of the most overrated fighters ever and he is a cheater.

 

Damn, you just had to bring your mancrush into this thread :doh:
Deny it all you want joto, just like you deny your attachment to my nutsack.

 

word.

Oscar won that fight, I don't care what anyone says. Mosley won the first, but Oscar won the second.

 

Exactly. Paid off judges had more to do with that 'win' that steroids.

DLH - Juicer killer :bears:

 

Mosley probably would've fared better without the EPO. He seemed sluggish and slow in that fight, and his punch output was way down. Much of it of course was due to Oscar's out-boxing him. I think he was afraid of getting knocked out and didn't want to put on another pssy display like he had in the rematch with Forrest.

 

:bangh:

how do you figure that a medicine that increases stamina and the ability to receive oxygen makes somebody sluggish?

 

Well, Seing as YOU Said Roy was LINKED to BALCO & this Thread REFERENCES BALCO, REED Figured it'd B a PERFECT Opportunity for YOU to Prove that U WEREN'T just Talking Out of your ASS...

But OBVIOUSLY, U Were, Since U Made this Accusation OVER a Month Ago & Still HAVEN'T Produced ANY Evidence of what U Said...Fuckin SCRUB...

Get OVER Yourself, Mija...B 4 REED EVER Knew who the Fuck YOU Were, YOU were Initiating Messageboard Confrontations...So Keep REED OUT of YOUR Thoughts & Posts & See Who Jocks WHO 1st...Since U're USELESS N the General Forum, Take your Bitch Ass Back to Smacktalk & PRETEND it's Funny Talking Shit about Another Man's Child...



REED:boohoo:

 

They definitely were, not a DLH fan but he definitely beat Mosley that night. Mosley even looked surprised when heard the decision because his face had the look of a beaten man. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o>

 

my guess is EPO isn't the only thing he took. he probably bulked up with some other crap, and tried to counter-act its slowing him down with EPO. but it didn't work too well.

people always laugh at me but if you watch closely there's no denying that Mosley looked like Jeff Lacy fighting ODH in the rematch.

 

Maybe he was too bulky for that fight, but I'm not sure that means he would have done better without taking anything.

The people who watched from ringside (who scored it for Mosley in much greater %'s than those who watched on TV), said one of the main reasons for doing it was that while DLH was busier, Mosley clearly landed the "harder" more "telling" punches...something that didn't translate to television.

 

I am positive that Mosley was on roids, for that fight and others. The thing is that EPO would not cause that. The upside it might have resulted to is that Mosley finishedthe fight stronger and thus won

 

He tested positive, idiot. ::::

 

:boohoo:

Yeah, N a BOGUS Boxing Commission...& his Opponent ALSO Tested Postive, IDIOT...& they Both PASSED their RE-Tests, IDIOT...

How Many OTHER Times have BOTH Participants Come Up POSITIVE???...That's UNfuckingPRECEDENTED if REED's Not Mistaken & Definitely Brings the Test ITSELF into Question...If U're Thinking RATIONALLY, that Is...

How Many OTHER Times has Roy (OR Richard Hall for that Matter) Come Up Positive???...U Mean to Tell REED that Indiana had the Means to "Find" Something that the Vegas, New Jearsey & New York Commissions COULDN'T "Find"???...

IDIOT...



REED:boohoo:

 

James Toney and Danny Batchelder.

 

Yeah, if both guys test positive, then the test must be wrong:notallthere:

How many times was Jones tested during his training seasons? One time less than he was tested positive

 

& How Many Times has Toney Tested POSITIVE???...Do the Words "Track Record" Mean Anything???...



REED:dunno:

 

Nobody can find shit when you use the correct/undetectable stuff at the right dose at the right time. Did Shane test positive once? Roy simply messed it up and got caught.::

 

Toney and Batchelder both tested positive in their fight.

A drug test in Indiana is the same as Vegas or New York.

 

Considering the RARITY N that Occurence, U HAVE to Look @ the POSSIBILITY that the Test ITSELF was Faulty...Unless U HATE 1 of the Fighters Involved, that Is:boohoo:...

Show REED a HISTORY of Steroid Use...A PAPER TRAIL...A SOURCE that CONFIRMS Selling the Goods to Roy (as Conte has Done w/Sugar Shane), SOMETHING...

ALL U have is ONE Test N a SHAKY Commission & your CONTEMPT for Roy Jones...



REED:boohoo:

 

Riiiiight...

So Since U HATE Roy, U're MORE than Willing, Actually GIDDY about TARNISHING his ENTIRE Career Over ONE Test...

How Convenient...



REED:boohoo:

 

Exactly...

So if Roy was MASKING his Usage of Illegal Substances, Vegas OR New York would've DETECTED it @ SOME Point, Don't U Think...

But as we Type, there's Been ONE Positive Test, Followed by a NEGATIVE RE-Test, N ONE Boxing Commission...

What's MORE Believable???...The ONE Indiana Test OR the 15-20 Tests Taken N Vegas, New York & New Jearsey???...




REED:hammert:

 

Yes, if they had tested him during training. Klitschko's haven't tested positive in their pro careers. Do you honestly believe they stopped using roids after their amateur careers? Of course you do - no positive test, nothing has happened

 

UNlike YOU, REED DOESN'T have this Innate Sense of SUSPICION, NOR a PATHETIC Desire to DIScredit Every Athlete @ All Costs...

UNlike YOU, REED Prefers a Thing Called EVIDENCE, B 4 SHITTING on an Athlete's Career...w/Out EVIDENCE, your Suspicions R Fucking USELESS...


REED:boohoo:

 

That is ok. Personally I have followed sports too much to think like that anymore, the only way of not seeing how much cheating is going on with all sports is not wanting to see it.

Btw. I am not shitting on anyone's career here. Jones, like others, have just used all the means demanded to be succesful. These days to be the best fighter in the world, you have to cheat a bit

 

Yeah exactly, the Associated Press had Mosley winning that fight 8-4. I can understand ppl thinking Hoya won that fight but if you watch that fight again, he didn't land half as much of the shots he appeared to on first viewing.

 

Only 8 of the 28 sportswriters polled ringside had DLH ahead.

I had DLH winning, but it was a close fight with its share of close rounds.

 

Accurate. And not just much greater %'s, but in the majority, as I remember.
I think it was like 60/40 each way (mosley ringside or dlh tv).

I scored it for dlh on tv (like most of us), but denying the majority view at ringside and crying robbery means you probably haven't seen a fight at ringside.

 

Reed, they could present you with video evidence and you'd claim tampering. Roy admission and you'd claim coercion. Roy's chickens could cluck guilty and you'd claim bias. Roy's personal doctor could testify to giving Roy the juice and you'd claim he was mistaken. You just aren't credible on the issue. Yeah, you've got a speck of hope in your argument, but it is implausible and undeserving of your lovemaking to it.

 

I wasn't aware I cried anything in this thread.

 

I wasn't aware I was accusing you of it; more like the 15 threads in front of yours.