Demetrius is going to f*ck Holt up

Bradley and easy. Holt is a bum.

 

that's a bold statement there. holt's beaten contenders after contenders. bradley beat one good fighter who's in his decline and a fringe lightweight contender.

 

Contender after contender? Holt? Like who? Ben Tackie? Demitrius "Son of Steve" Hopkins? David "135 pounder" Diaz? Who?

 

he also beat arnoutis and hlatshwayo.

it's not like 140 is full of talent. he's certainly more proven than bradley.

based on what can you say that bradley wins easily? holt's never been dominated.

i'm guessing you obviously dont like holt.

 

I don't think Holt is very good. Thats what I think. He's a cautious cat, with speed to burn, but no confidence in his ability to take it. So he's flashy with a terrible chin. Thats always beatable in my book.

Bradley is bull strong, good high guard and is quick enough to get in on Kendall and do damage while there. I think Bradley (who's not a puncher) will stop Holt.

 

Hlatschwayo is better than Bradley.
Holt beats Bradley. Not a lock because Bradley is busy enough to win a decision, but Holt is more talented, hits harder, and is far more proven. Holt can win via KO or decision, Bradley only on points.

 

how is falloutIII?

will i have to have been into the 1st 2 to enjoy it? it looks kn good though.

 

yep. holt's ko loss to that tall nameless guy on espn changed entirely the trajectory of his career imhumbeo.

 

That was an awesome fight. Holt has been in two classic one round wars.

 

Bradley hits hard enough to at least drop and probably KO Holt. I pick Bradley to beat Holt and Hlatshwayo is certainly not better than Bradley, well IMO anyways.

 

Bradley isn't better than Isaac? :notallthere:

 

Bradley by decision, or possibly by late TKO.

 

:laughing::laughing:

 

You don't have to play the first two games to enjoy part 3. Part 3 has a lot of the same gameplay elements but transformed into 3D. The story is completely original so I would say it's completely separated (except by style) from the first two games. Get it if you have a high powered PC (or Xbox 360).

 

Shove it with that Bradley shit. He is only slightly better than Holt. I am so sick of this motherfucker. He deserves no hype. He barely, barely beat Junior Witter who was terrified of him. If Bradley were good, he'd have dominated or stopped Witter. He barely won the fight. Honestly, Witter easily could havbe gotten the decision. It would have been bad, but not a robbery.

 

:atu the thread title

 

glad Holt won....just so we can see Holt-Torres 3.....besides, Hopkins would be one of the most boring champions in boxing....this is good

btw....Holt is the weakest of the belt holders at 140

 

:atu::atu: Shits & Giggles Strikes AGAIN!!!....

There's NOfuckingWAY N Hell that Witter Could've Gotten that Verdict, which is PRECISELY Why Bradley Got the Knod IN Witter's Country...

"Barely", REED's Ass...That was a CLEAR-CUT Victory for Bradley...Try WATCHING the Fight, Homegirl...



REED:hammert:

 

Witter would likely knock Holt out.

I like Holt though, and no Tam.. he's far from being a bum. He's a live underdog against Bradley, but I think Tim will beat him.

 

holt's better than that shot to shit version of vivian harris. he's also better than the version of corley that shared a break-dance contest w/ witter.

witter towards the end was clearly on the downside. not sure if he would've beaten holt, but he certainly doesn't knock him out.

holt vs. bradley is an even fight imo. holt's chinny, but bradley isn't a hard puncher. it will be a tactical 12 round fight.

 

Why is Bradley better than Hlatschwayo?
Sure, you may think he is better, and maybe he is, but Hlatschwayo's resume is superior by a pretty good margin, I'd say.

 

hlatshwayo is rangy and difficult to fight. however, he hasn't beaten any quality opponents at 140 or 147. he's also not a fun guy to watch. watching him fight is akin to watching malik scott except isaac fights are usually scheduled for 12 rounds opposed to 8.

holt beat his ass soundly.

 

Hlathswayo should have lost to Rodriguez in South Africa, which means he´s done.

 

Isaac isn't much good at all. It's not even worth arguing.

 

Do you not think his resume is better?
I've quite a few fights from both and the best Hlatschwayo is better than the best Bradley.
Witter choked.

 

No, honestly, I don't. Isaac has beaten a few washed up names and an overrated clown called "Nate Campbell". I don't see anything else on there. He struggled out here against one of our own shitty prospects, enough that he had to come out here and fight him again. He's just averaged.

:: @ Witter choked. If he did, it was because Bradley's fists were stuck down his throat.

 

i dont get it. holt's a 'bum' and campbell is a 'clown', yet bradley doesn't get criticized what so ever? haha

 

When Bradley gets beat by a scrub or two, he'll earn a name himself.

 

Just watched this last night. What a shitty fight? I hope I never see Hopkins again...............Holt didn't look much better. :shit:

 

THIS is probably the reason why this is even up for debate. But beating Nate isnt that big of an accomplishment when you factor that Pedan did it TWICE.

Bradley is a better fighter than Campbell also.