RJJ vs. anyone ranked by a prominent sanctioning body

The answer is no.

 

?

 

Is your answer the bottle?

 

Double L versus a bottle of Vodka sanctioned by Absolut

Vodka by crushing KO

 

Roy fought nothing but guys ranked by the prominent sanctioning bodies for years.

 

::

 

I thought the same thing

Trouble Mel puts his foot in his mouth yet again

 

Not just the sanctioning bodies. His HBO contract stated his opponents had to be ranked in the top 10 by Ring Magazine.

 

Wow. This is pretty much the most lame topic I've seen around here in a while.

 

This is really the ONE thing competition wise that you can't attack Roy for. ::

 

i mean now!!! in the year 2009.

 

LOL, oh

well in that case, you are probably right

he is a very shot fighter

 

Isn't "prominent-sanctioning body" a contradiction of terms?

 

Roy is only five months removed from fighting Joe Calzaghe.

 

meaning what?

 

not if you know the meaning of the word, "prominent."

 

Please give us an example of a prominent sanctioning body

 

Are you serious?

 

::

 

I think it means: "Holds too much and should be disqualified".

 

::

 

look up the word, "prominent." it has nothing to do with honesty or integrity. it simply means well known. don't try to tell me there aren't prominent sanctioning bodies. examples are: WBC and WBA.

 

Dude...folks know what the word means, stop trying to pretend you're the only one with a dictionary when it's obvious you are just getting your chain yanked. ::

 

someone here obviously didn't know the meaning when they claimed that a prominent sanctioning body was a contradiction in terms.

and nobody's yanking my chain. they're just acting like children as per usual.

i swear, it's like discussing boxing with kindergartners in this place sometimes.

disagreements and debates are what it's all about but some of you can't seem to tolerate it when it comes to me - you immediately resort to insulting me or making idiotic jokes that you'd have to be a moron to find funny.

this isn't TAA. take your immature crap over there.

 

::

This is why folks crack on you. You post things looking to ruffle folks' feathers (knowing full well what kind of reaction you are likely to get) and then you act like a :crying: when the expected result occurs.

 

:crying:

bull-shit. i posts things for the same reason others do. to initiate a discussion. in this case, it's to point out that RJJ is done as a legitimate contender.

if you're reaction to that is going to be emotional then you're just a baby.

what are you suggesting? that i bite my tongue when a topic occurs to me because it might hurt some posters' feelings? that's exactly what it sounds like you're proposing.

 

Did you even bother to look to see who is rated by your prominent organizations and think about how Jones would do against them or is this another one of your "pull something out of your ass without thinking because you hate a particular fighter" posts?

 

so make your case. see if you can do it without getting personal.

 

Is this the best you can do for a response? In a nutshell, what you've said is...

"I'm not a baby...YOU'RE a baby!!"::

I'm not saying that you should not post things, but when you post things that you are most likely gonna get ragged on for, then don't :crying: about it when it happens.

For example, when I post things that I know the Tyson huggers aren't going to like...I know they will be attacking me...but I don't get all bent out of shape and :crying: about it. I refute whatever they say with facts and eventually they give up and leave me alone.

 

No, you are the one who claims Jones would lose to each and every rated fighter. Before I even go to the trouble of thinking of this topic, I want to know if you bothered to even look at the rankings or if you are just making some sweeping statement based on your dislike for Jones. It's not right for you to expect folks to provide well thought out answers if you haven't done your homework before starting this topic.