What, Jaws overreact? No way. And I especially like how he MADE UP that I said Tyson is a fraud and he would lose to any solid heavyweight. The poor kid doesn't realize that his endless lies rob him of any credibility he might have. And I actually kinda feel bad because he fancies himself as a writer, but he doesn't have the objectivity and attention to detail that a good writer needs. His passion for the sport is commendable, but his willingness to make things up and disregard the facts to "prove" a point is not. I don't mind when folks disagree with me, but I prefer when they come at me with FACTS rather than anger, misquotes and lies.
Tyson has claimed many things. What evidence is there to support he wasn't 100% against anyone other than those guys?
If you don't believe every word Tyson says you are nothing but a biased hater.:warning: Evidence?? We don't need no stinkin' evidence!!
I'm a little confused with where you are going with this. And what are you saying "perhaps" to? That I find the Tyson Tiny Prime theory amusing? I'm not sure how to respond because I am not sure what you are coming up with a counter point to from my post. I'm not saying that Tyson had a short prime, so saying Bowe had a shorter one isn't really disagreeing with me. Or are you just disagreeing with me for the fun of it?
I simply restated his only contributions to this thread. I see that after my response, there have been 12 posts aimed at some kind of objectivity after the fact. The fact that Tyson matches up favorably against Ali is simply a fact. Ali is a terrible infighter, when guys brought pressure he consistently sat on the ropes and allowed smaller lesser guys like Frazier and Norton and Cooper and Doug jones and the euroscrubs and etc... to wail on him round after round. That is suicide against Tyson. And I know, none of you agree. And I know I'm in for 12 back and forths nitpicking everything in this post. I'm simply pointing out that there has been no substantive reasons posted in this thread about the matchup from either one of you.
No, as usual, you LIED and tried to make it sound like I said things like "Tyson was a fraud" and he would lose to "any solid heavy" and he "scraped by Tillis" and of course...I said none of this. And as usual, you don't let anything (like say...the truth) get in the way of your blind Tyson devotion. Do you work hard at telling lies or is it simply a pathological thing for you? To sum up... At no point in this discussion did I say Tyson was "a fraud". At no point in this discussion did I say "Tyson would lose to any solid fighter". At no point in this discussion did I say Tyson "scraped by" Tillis. And the Douglas thing was obviously a joke directed at the folks who like to claim that Douglas became Superman for one night when he fought Tyson in an attempt to lessen the sting of the loss. And the worst part is that you know this, but choose to present it as if I think Douglas is better than Tyson...which of course is total bullshit. But that's no big surprise because bullshit and bluster are pretty much all you bring to the table in any discussion. As far as I am concerned, you are nothing more than another Kid Dynamite. Congratulations.
But of course Kid Dynamite II is correct. I mean, Ali was no better than Tyrell Biggs, right? Which means he would suffer the same fate as Biggs, right? Oh, wait...Kid Dynamite II didn't want it to be too obvious that he was basing his Ali-Tyson prediction on Tyson-Biggs so he added an extra round to disguise it.
He never said the things you claimed he said, so you didnt state his contributions, you made up your own versions of them. There has been objectivity from the very beginning of this thread, it didnt JUST appear,
