In 25 years, who will boxing remember in a brighter light: Pacquiao or Mayweather Jr?

I guess he's referring to the pot shot style that PBF has:dunno:








:laughing:

 

30 punches a round?:dunno:

 

I honestly think you have me mistaken for another poster, my friend:nono: The only time I have ever said Floyd should fight Hatton was when they all were at 140. Floyd chose to move up. Since the DLH fight I have been saying that the only fight I am interested in seeing Floyd fight in is Mosely. After Williams beat Margarito I said that Floyd will never fight Williams because he doesn't want to lose that zero in the loss collumn. When Floyd called Hatton out after the Castillo fight I said the only reason he is calling out Hatton is to avoid Mosely.

 

do you guys have the same sentiments as far as who will be remember in a brighter light since 2 years ago or did you change your minds now?::

 

ah ::
if Pac was leading in the poll 2 years ago...




but i'd still vote for Mayweather just to piss Alabamaman off :cheer:

 

Floyd for sure..

 

NO....

 

i said Mayweather easily...but then Pacquiao did what he did..&....:hammert:

 

::

 

::::

 

You are right RJJ was p4p#1 because he had not lost, but it was obvious he was shot after the first Tarver fight. Floyd was #1 after Roy was KO'd.

 

Jesus. ::

It still might happen!!!!

 

Boxing forums are a motherfucker, man. People can dig all kinds of stupid shit up that you dont even remember saying and make you look silly, simply because it's such a tough sport to get right consistently.

How could any of us know that Manny wasn't human? Evne back then, if someone told you he'd knock out a 135, 140 and 147 pound champ, along with Oscar De La Hoya all in the space of two years? Well, you'd have tem commited for sure.

 

:: Yep.

I couldn't believe what I was reading when I clicked the thread. Amazing how things can change in two and a half short years.

The idea of Pacquiao being a legit fight for Mayweather is insane when you sit down and think about it.

 

Revise history much? It was a clear win for Morales and Morales was not in any danger in the 12th. Manny lost, get over it.

 

::

 

Hector "Macho" Camacho did it first. I think it was when he fought De La Hoya.

 

And he fought just as bravely.

 

If you don't think Morales was in danger in the 12th round, you're blind as a bat, mate.

 

Manny Pacquiao represents all that is good in boxing. Valor, heart, strength, power and aggression.

Floyd represents everything that is wrong, cowardliness, crying in the ring, beating women, fiscal irresponsibility , fakeness, homosexual entourages, running in the face of battle, retiring rather than face Antonio Margarito.


Floyd might beat Manny in this godless world, but he will never have the adoration of a country or the love his family. Manny is a good person. Floyd is a criminal, a savage by anther name.

 

Sorry guys, I had to create my own poll option.::

BTW, just remember, only 23 years remaining! ::::

 

He was still bad ass enough to switch southpaw and trade with Manny.

Remember Tam, first fights are the most meaningfull, you said it, not me.

Morales > Pacquiao.
:hammert:

 

:bears:

 

Morales, greater than Pacquiao? ::

Just because you beat a guy doesn't mean you're better than him. Morales didn't beat shit else and while exciting, is easily one of the most overrated fighters in years.

 

I thought it was clear it was a joke. Relax.

 

I dont know if the question can be answered without first giving some attention to the global dynamic- economically, culturally, politically.

In 25 years, there may be a renaissance in all things American, and Mayweather, along with the performing artists of his era, will be exhumed and celebrated more.

Or, it may well truly be the Asian Century , with all things Oriental celebrated ad infinitum.

It is unlikely that Slapsy Maxy Kellerman will be wielding a bigger stick in 2035 than he is now.