Examples of when the better fighter lost simply due to size disadvantage...

Discussion in 'General Boxing Discussion' started by Double L, Oct 29, 2010.

  1. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,585
    Likes Received:
    1,809
    PBF most certainly benefited from his size advantage against Hatton and JMM. PBF out-muscled Hatton to combat the success of Hatton's pressure. Had he not been able to stand in with Hatton, for example when he couldn't against Castillo or ODH, he would not have had the success he did.

    And JMM? Give me a break. Anyone who thinks that fight's complexion would not have changed drastically had JMM been the same size is just fucking crazy and/or stupid.
     
  2. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,585
    Likes Received:
    1,809
    More proof that his size disadvantage was significant in the out-come of the fight.
     
  3. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    70,344
    Likes Received:
    5,868
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    That pattern of the Marquez fight, rather than the result was determined by the weight. I don't think Marquez could have beaten Floyd at 130lb but it's an entirely different and more relevant fight there.
     
  4. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2002
    Messages:
    30,692
    Likes Received:
    4
    Where did you find these averages for stamina?
     
  5. Ugotabe Kidding

    Ugotabe Kidding WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2002
    Messages:
    17,162
    Likes Received:
    1,714
    Home Page:
    Watching their punch output. The difference is there although there are exceptional fighters in all classes
     

Share This Page