Who is greater P4P?

Disagreed with all. So I guess this argument is a tie.

Duran got clearly beaten by one and embarrassed by the other so Pac couldn't do much worse.

Matter of taste. Evander Holyfield was more "complete" than Muhammad Ali. Does that mean he was better?

Compared to someone who has shitload of losses and an excuse to all of them, actually beating guys doesn't sound THAT bad

Sure. Even if that happened, it would not change the fact that Pac is one of the best ever

 

Special fighter, yes. Most special fighter of his generation? No.

 

::

Tell me about it.... somebody on THIS SITE said the first person that came to mind when he saw Pac with the long hair and beard was Justin Beiber. JUSTIN BEIBER!

That's like getting a picture of Tits in a Rorsarch test and saying you see a big throbbing johnson. ::

 

LMAO. Sad business, aint it.

 

Pacquiao doesn't remind me of Bieber. Bieber is less of a diva than he is.

 

:: :: :bears:

 

Hearns, Hagler, Leonard, and Benitez would ALL embarrass Pacquiao. Not that he'd ever fight any of them. He might've tried to fight Duran after the Kirkland Laing fight.

I disagree that Holyfield was a more complete fighter than Ali. Ali could do everything he could do, and did most of it better, with the exception of maybe fighting on the inside.

Yeah, beating up a bunch of bums is better than losing to all-time greats outside of your prime, way above your natural weight class.

It would add the qualifier to "of this generation" to "one of the best ever."

 

You might add that qualifier, I certainy wouldnt.

 

It's hard to rank acomplishments, the greater argument is always subjective. I would say Pac probably outranks Hops by a little bit. Now, head to head I would give the edge to Bernard.

 

Thoughts of Agapito Sanchez, perhaps?