Benitez-Duran, or Kalambay-McCallum 1? IMO, these are the two most beautiful boxing exhibitions over the distance. Both El Radar, and Kalambay put on absolutely FLAWLESS performances.... which was better? I was thinking of adding McGirt-Brown to the discussion, since thats also a flawless boxing clinic, but its not AS impressive considering that Simon Brown isnt in the same class as Duran, and McCallum.
You're missing out. I would imagine that both are on youtube. Trust me, both are worth viewing multiple times. Two beautiful virtuoso boxing displays. I'd say Benitez's performance was slightly more electrifying though. Duran(despite what his groupies might say) was in shape, and "up" for the fight.... but he simply had NO answers at all for Will.
Wilfredo is definitely a guy I need to check out more. I've only seen his fight with Ray Leonard, which, I feel, was stopped early. Apart from that, not much. Too bad what happened to him in the end. Arum was indeed a worm. Anyfight where Duran loses or where the "Valero" is brought out of him is worth watching.
Disagree big time! The Duran fight was Benitez at his TRUE best. He beat Duran alot more clearly than he did Palomino, and it goes without saying that Duran was better than Palomino. The Palomino fight IMO his 3rd best performance. The Cervantes fight was his 2nd best performance.
the Cervantes fight was close the Palomino fight wasn't Duran at 154 is a sometimes good fighter, it's less impressive to me... if you make that fight in 1979, Benitez is not winning
Benitez over Duran was more impressive to me. The Duran, at 154, who fought Benetiz was the soft, flabby, almost disinterested version. It was impressive that Benitez was able to beat a guy that normal ate counter punchers for lunch with his swarming style and amazingly underrated footwork. But I was disgusted by the Duran that fought Wilfred. But on the other hand, Kalambay benefited from home town judging in a fight I thought McCallum narrowly but clearly deserved to win. Who's ever heard of 4 or 5 rounds scored EVEN in a title fight? And this isn't up for debate. :) On the other hand, Kalambay was able to out
BALDERDASH!!!... When Roberto Duran was 'Right', he was Impossible to Defeat, IMPOSSIBLE!!!...The Mere Fact that Benitez BEAT him is MORE than Enough Reason to SULLY that Win... REED:egypt:
I'm not taking anything away from it, I just don't think that Roberto Duran by that stage of his career was anywhere near the fighter he was even three years earlier Make it 1977 at 140 or 1979 at 147 and I think Duran definitely comes out on top either way
So What U're Saying is, Esteban DeJesus was BETTER than Wilfred Benitez, Since he Managed to CONVINCINGLY Beat Duran Around that Same Timeframe, CLOSER to Duran's BEST Weight???... REED:dunno:
CONVENIENT, BUILT-IN Excuse for the DECISIVE Loss to DeJesus Coming in 5.......4.......3.....2..... REED:shit:
Does ANY Fighter Get the BENEFIT of "Glitches", "Lack of Focus", "Lack of Motivation" or Being "Out of Shape" MORE than Duran Does???...There's a Segment of Posters who Conjure Up EXCUSES for Every One of his Losses... REED:shit:
It's not an excuse, it is his own fault. But it's well-documented that Ray Arcel yelled at Duran in the dressing room while Duran was in tears, telling him "you lost that fight in the gym!" Duran proved that to be true and that he was fully capable of beating DeJesus when they rematched. And yes, DeJesus was an excellent lightweight.
What's FUNNY about All of this is that it was Usually Duran Fans that CHASTISED REED for "Idol Worshipping" Roy Jones Back in the Day, yet Ya'll Do the Same Shit EVERY BIT as MUCH, if Not More...When the Topic was Roy, Guys Said "NO Fighter is Invincible, ANYBODY Can B Beaten, There's ALWAYS a Guy that Has your #, etc.".... MANY of those Same Posters R VEHEMENT Supporters of Roberto Duran & they Do the Same Shit U're Doing Here...IDOL WORSHIPPING him... So NO Fighter (Except for Duran) is Invincible???...ANYBODY (Except for Duran) Can B Beaten????...Duran Basically MADE HIMSELF Lose the Fights he Did???...There's ALWAYS a Guy that Has your # (Except for Duran)???... Sorry, but there's Absolutely NATHAN that Suggests Duran would've EVER Beaten Wilfred Benitez OR Tommy Hearns...He was Beaten Sooooo THOROUGHLY that it was MORE than "Motivation", "Focus", "Not Being Right" (or Whatever Other CRUTCH U Choose to Use) that Lead to him LOSING... Dude was a Great, GREAT Fighter...Top 3-5 All Time EASILY...But he WASN'T this Impervious Fighting Machine that YOU & Many Others Make him Out to B.... REED:dancingBaby:
DeJesus did very well in both rematches...even though he was beaten brutally he held his own. And he had real excuses in those fights (strung-out) unlike durans excuse (blew up between fights)
The Duran from Duran-Leonard 1 would've beaten Benitez. I agree Duran never beats Hearns. But there's really no shame in that.
I don't know what the beef here is. Duran is a legend. He is also one of the very very very few lightweights who have both dominated their own division and offered something significant outside of it.
Dejesus got one out of three off Duran Benitez arguably lost to Bruce curry and Harold Weston, if you want to get into semantics