The problem is the movie is anticlimactic. It's a sudden ending and some feel that it wasnt worth all the buildup. They might be right in that sense. But i didnt care. No different than most hitchcock films out there.
I know right? I don't get that, it was like an 7.5/10 for me, totally enjoyed it, although I agree the ending could have been better, it wasn't a bad ending just a mediocre one.
people expect too much from movies this is a top movie...of course not a great movie or anything (those only come out every 5 years these days) but defenitely worth watching
Nope I actually don't. There are very few (if any) actresses who I have a crush on to the point that they'd make me enjoy a movie. As eye candy they can be a plus to a movie but they'd never make me enjoy a shit movie. Also Saldana is merely an okay looking chic to me, nothing special. Don't get me wrong she is hot, but she's not make a thread or put her on a list of hot actresses hot. I think she's about a 7/10.
um Columbiana was a piece of shit. Zoe Saldana's hotness gives it a few extra points, but it was still a shit movie.
Yep I totally agree with that. As much as I enjoyed Hanna it had no replay value. Can't really defend Columbiana from all the people dissing it because try as I might I can't remember hardly anything about the movie other than Saldanas screwing scene.
Colombian people in Colombia talking to each other in ENglish with every 5th sentence said in Spanish, then father and mother leaving their kid by the kicthen table while trying to fight off a drug cartel then the little girl turns into james bond jumping off buildings and shit. This movie is awful so far lb, it better start getting good soon. issed: