you think otherwise? the queer was on the deck vs pedestrians there. for the record i was referring to a fight at super feather
I assumed you were joking. Ive clearly under-estimated your coloured vision of the man. I dont know what he did to you, but as a Mosley apologist, you should be more grateful. True, Mosley couldnt attract flies if he were a piece of shit, but De La Hoya effectively made his career. Just sayin...LOL.
no joke, i got valero over delahoya at super featherweight. you realize delahoya was a corpse at that weight?
valero was far more impressive at super feather than delahoya. beat better guys, etc. bums like giorgio campanella had the queer on the floor
Ramonza will shit on ANY other fighter to defend his Golden cross dresser. Thats the TRUE definition of a groupie.
not sure who wins at lightweight, i'd pick valero over everyone de la hoya has beaten at 135. if valero was around then, oscar wouldn't have fought him.
Pretty brave appearance from a Tyson fan. We're talking competition levels here, its not your boys strong suite, you should sit this one out. Although I do have a question for you --- if you were forced to choose to live with one reputation or the other, would you choose cross-dresser or rapist and thug with clear homosexual complexities (and a voice Donald Duck would make fun of)?
There's more evidence that De La Hoya is a rapist than there is that Tyson is a rapist. As far as homosexual proclivities go, DLH is a crossdresser .. he sounds gay as hell, too. Above all of that, Tyson is about the realest and most honest guy there is associated with the sport of boxing. DLH is about the phoniest and fakest, and that's saying a LOT.
oh & I would probably also take Valero over DLH at 130.. DLH was a dead man walking at that weight, if he couldn't blast Valero out early he'd wind up getting KO'd himself
