Spinks vs. Holyfield (190)...

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by Ramonza Soliloquies, Jan 10, 2012.

  1. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Weight-wise, its Holyfield's turf, but I doubt Spinks would lose anywhere near as much here as he did moving upto Heavy, and he would carry a clear edge in big-fight experience.
     
  2. Holyfield would destroy Leon Spinks.

    He'd decision Michael Spinks in a close one.
     
  3. Ugotabe Kidding

    Ugotabe Kidding WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ


    Also, I see the extra weight being too much for Cory
     
  4. word.
     
  5. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Great fight. Don't know on this one.
     
  6. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Don't think the weight is much of a factor - Spinks was still very comfortable & wiry at 200lb, 190 would be no problem at all. Holyfield's speed might present more problems than his size, IMO
     
  7. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Spinks SD 15
     
  8. Spinks beat Holyfield? Not in this life or the life to come...
     
  9. Ugotabe Kidding

    Ugotabe Kidding WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Yep. After all that pondering HutHut should have at least got the winner right
     
  10. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    An inexperienced 15 odd fight Holyfield at 190? You overestimate Evander & underestimate Spinks.
     
  11. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Agreed.

    If Spinks has no chance, Im a one-legged Korean rice farmer.

    This is a fight all the way.
     
  12. loadedgloves

    loadedgloves "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    I'm with Hut on this.
     
  13. When are you sending me that rice, ya damned Korean!
     
  14. Evander's bigger, stronger, faster and throws more punches. He also has the better chin. Y'all please tell the Sly how Spinks wins?
     
  15. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    This ain't Gridiron, brah
     
  16. word...that's why i added throws more punches and has better chin. :lol:
     
  17. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Im not sure he throws more punches at all and a 190 Holy aint a 220 Tyson anyway, Spinks chin would be fine. This'd be a contest of skills and brains not a fight night round 3 contest settled by each guys physical attributes!
     
  18. Ramonza Soliloquies

    Ramonza Soliloquies "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    And Spinks had WAY more brains than Holyfield.
     
  19. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Nonsense

    Spinks was a better fighter "p4p" than Holyfield... this fight isn't at heavyweight (where I agree Holy wins big) ... it's at cruiserweight... I don;t see Spinks losing much coming up from 175 and you seem to forget that Holyfield was still a raw guy at that weight, he had to fight hard nonstop against Qawi (whom Spinks easily outboxed and frankly, embarrassed) just to get a close decision win. Mike presents a lot of serious issues for Evander, particularly his versatility, his legs and his jab... and he had the punch to get his respect. It's a good fight, but Spinks is a clear favorite at this weight, he was a better fighter
     

Share This Page