Who ranks higher, Mayweather or Leonard?

Just to check, this applies across the board right, McDogg? We wouldn't want a lack of consistency here...

 

The twisting of the "former lightweight" and "weak knees and weak will" comments to somehow appear as if they were objective descriptors and not loaded bullshit was also pretty impressive

Christ, at least I admitted "desperation" was a bit of a stretch for the Curry fight

 

No, you still don't comprehend. I'll type it again slowly. Azazel saying McCallum wasn't really hurt is far less ridiculous than your moronic claim that McCallum was getting his ass kicked and scored a desperation knockout.

And there is absolutely no debate on this.

 

uhh.. what did he change at 175? he was still just speed & power, he just switched to more of a pot-shotting style (which he had always been capable of)

 

sure, to guys who dominate their opponents and who score their knockout victories legitimately

Doesn't apply to your boy and his shoeshining faggotry and friendly officiating

 

Azazel saying he wasn't hurt is fucking retarded and you attempting to glom on to it (in DESPERATION) with your "no one can really say for sure..." BULLSHIT is way, way, way more retarded than pointing out that McCallum was clearly losing that fight and needed to do something (which, credit to him, he did) ... I conceded pages and pages ago that desperation was a bit of a wind-up and exaggeration, yet you arre still harping on it because it is all you have

I'd tell you to re-read the thread, but there'd be no point. No e-thrashing has ever been sufficient to get you to say "yeah, you're right"

 

I thought I did a pretty good job of spelling this out yesterday, but I'll do it again since retention seems to b nowhere issue for you.

Duran was a former lightweight and beat Leonard. That is simply a fact. It's not speculative and it has no hidden meaning.

Hearns legs gave out and Leonard showed more desire to win at the end of their fight. That is my take on the end of their fight and you can disagree.

You don't need to cut certain parts of what I said to fit your context. It's written above in plain English. Absorb it. Try your best to comprehend it. If you disagree with either, fine. But do not paraphrase or change what I've said.

 

Floyd's competition shits all over Calslappy's, unfortunately.

 

I didn't mention Calzaghe. As it is I agree with you on the Floyd comparison.

 

Azazel statement looks like a scientific fact compared to your moronic claim that McCallum was getting his ass kicked.

E-thrashing? Please. The minute someone is forced to change their stance ( desperation, ass kicked), the debate is pretty much over.

I'm only continuing to see how many times I can make you admit that it wasn't a desperation knockout. Curious about the count so for?

:atu:

 

It's like discussing something with Rydellalm:

 

Duplicate

 

If Buddy makes you recant comments and adjust your position during these e-debates, then yes. It's exactly like that.

But if playing the " just like Rydell" card is the best you got then so be it. :wack:

 

good talk

 

::

Trpl... stop sucking so much.

 

NOW it's just like a Rydell conversation.:hump:

 

I disagree with cdogg on that one. I like Hitler more than Rydell.

 

Damn.

 

That was a low blow, I admit... Trpl is funny, genuine... Arguing with him is infuriating, though

There's a cookie jar and everybody is only allowed to have one cookie... A guy, we'll call him Jack, sees Trpl take a handful of cookies and calls him on it...

Jack: Hey! You took 5 cookies!

Trpl: WRONG, I took four

Jack: Well, the point stands, you took more than one

Trpl: You said I took five, you were wrong

Jack: Yes, I know, I already acknowledged that... Still, you took more than you were supposed to

Trpl: You said I took five... And now you are backtracking

Jack: Wait a minute, that's beside the point...

Trpl: Did you or did you not just lie about how many cookies I took?

Jack: Hold on a sec, the point is you broke the rules, you took more than what is allowed

Trpl: The point is that you lied

:red:

 

Seriosuly though, I apologize

I shouldn't have compared you to Rydell... That's awful and you deserve better

 

The SPIRIT of this Thread was FUN & the Actual Debate was LIVELY...Somebody Come Up w/Some More "Who Ranks Higher All Time" Type of Shit...

NOW!!!



REED:eye:

 

:bears:

 

:rock1:

 

agreed, i enjoyed this thread quite a bit. always fun to shit on leonard!

 

I made another one per your request.